Discussion EPL Dream Team Discussion - Season 2022/23

[vsberlina]

Enciso is one I really like. 7 goal involvements in 800 minutes when BRI's fixtures were congested and there was rotation where he got a chance. Now with MacAllister gone, should see lots more time. Got his goals against the big sides, so just wondering if he needs space on the counter to score. But at 5.5, is a decent risk if those funds saved can upgrade you elsewhere. Unfortunately, for now, Salah and Kane are just way out of reach if you also get Haaland.

Martinelli is one to stay away from IMO. Was the one to get subbed when Trossard came into the team and Jesus was fit. Now we can add Havertz to the mix. Minutes will be managed, so no need to risk him.

Simms one to watch. Might be the 4.5 FOR who might get time, especially if the fragile DCL breaks down again.

Ferguson too expensive now given his injury history. One I will stay away from. I think he cost me 100k in the rankings last season as he blocked me getting another of Mitoma or MacAllister. Best keep that BRI spot for March, Mitoma and Estupinan.

Wondering why Mings is still 4.5. Pau Torres comes in, then Mings is at risk of missing out. FPL know something?

I wonder if that's why Botman is also 4.5. Do they know of an imminent NEW signing that will jeopardise his starting status?

 

[The Banker]

Enciso is one I really like. 7 goal involvements in 800 minutes when BRI's fixtures were congested and there was rotation where he got a chance. Now with MacAllister gone, should see lots more time. Got his goals against the big sides, so just wondering if he needs space on the counter to score. But at 5.5, is a decent risk if those funds saved can upgrade you elsewhere. Unfortunately, for now, Salah and Kane are just way out of reach if you also get Haaland.

Martinelli is one to stay away from IMO. Was the one to get subbed when Trossard came into the team and Jesus was fit. Now we can add Havertz to the mix. Minutes will be managed, so no need to risk him.

Simms one to watch. Might be the 4.5 FOR who might get time, especially if the fragile DCL breaks down again.

Ferguson too expensive now given his injury history. One I will stay away from. I think he cost me 100k in the rankings last season as he blocked me getting another of Mitoma or MacAllister. Best keep that BRI spot for March, Mitoma and Estupinan.

Wondering why Mings is still 4.5. Pau Torres comes in, then Mings is at risk of missing out. FPL know something?

I wonder if that's why Botman is also 4.5. Do they know of an imminent NEW signing that will jeopardise his starting status?

I think Enciso is the pathway to those taking Salah. But imo even that's cutting it a bit fine, he might be just as good allowing funds across the squad. Haven't played around with him too much, but he's the only one I'd pick under Gibbs-White (my clear best 6.0 but punty with average fixtures to begin).

I'd rather pay the 0.5 for Saka and Odegaard over Martinelli due to rotation risk.

Don't know anything about Simms, but DCL is made of glass. Heard Balogun may go to Palace? Archer more opportunity than last season? Could be a few 4.5 options.

Problem I see with Ferguson is there's nothing around the 6.0 range if it goes wrong. Same could be said for Enciso at 5.5 in mid but there seems to be closer openings in midfield than forward.

I think they just got Botman's price wrong to be honest. The fixtures are average, and CL could be a downside. Everything I have seen though say's he should have been 5.0. Mings on the other hand is risky with Torres coming in.

 

[vsberlina]

I think Enciso is the pathway to those taking Salah. But imo even that's cutting it a bit fine, he might be just as good allowing funds across the squad. Haven't played around with him too much, but he's the only one I'd pick under Gibbs-White (my clear best 6.0 but punty with average fixtures to begin).

I'd rather pay the 0.5 for Saka and Odegaard over Martinelli due to rotation risk.

Don't know anything about Simms, but DCL is made of glass. Heard Balogun may go to Palace? Archer more opportunity than last season? Could be a few 4.5 options.

Problem I see with Ferguson is there's nothing around the 6.0 range if it goes wrong. Same could be said for Enciso at 5.5 in mid but there seems to be closer openings in midfield than forward.

I think they just got Botman's price wrong to be honest. The fixtures are average, and CL could be a downside. Everything I have seen though say's he should have been 5.0. Mings on the other hand is risky with Torres coming in.

Enciso + Salah = 5.5 + 12.5 = 18
Bruno + Odegaard = 8.5 + 8.5 = 17
Still not enough. If you punt on Enciso, the only other option is MGW (who might be on PKs). But one week and even that option might be blocked if there’s a price movement in the wrong direction and you’ve kept only 0.5 ITB.

IMO, the equation is really TAA or Salah. That’s where the extra 1.0 has gone. Will TAA continue with his form of 60pts in the last 10 games @ an avg of 6.0 PPM? If so, then that’s around 228 for the year. Not impossible. Salah would then have to get 340 to be the same value. If he’s on par for that, then peeps will be dumping Haaland for him and grabbing Kane with the spare 1.5 units.

I think FPL have thought about this very cunningly. VVD cheaper too. TAA or VVD, then with the extra 2.0, Salah & MGW? Trippier or Botman? 2.0 difference there too.

There’s definitely no right or wrong. It will come down to luck. But balance seems to be the key. If things go wrong, how easily can you get to the 2nd best option?

Don’t get me starting on James and Chilwell. Both enticing at 5.5 and no UCL. As glassy as DCL though.

 

[Burly]

Enciso is one I really like. 7 goal involvements in 800 minutes when BRI's fixtures were congested and there was rotation where he got a chance. Now with MacAllister gone, should see lots more time. Got his goals against the big sides, so just wondering if he needs space on the counter to score. But at 5.5, is a decent risk if those funds saved can upgrade you elsewhere. Unfortunately, for now, Salah and Kane are just way out of reach if you also get Haaland.

Martinelli is one to stay away from IMO. Was the one to get subbed when Trossard came into the team and Jesus was fit. Now we can add Havertz to the mix. Minutes will be managed, so no need to risk him.

Simms one to watch. Might be the 4.5 FOR who might get time, especially if the fragile DCL breaks down again.

Ferguson too expensive now given his injury history. One I will stay away from. I think he cost me 100k in the rankings last season as he blocked me getting another of Mitoma or MacAllister. Best keep that BRI spot for March, Mitoma and Estupinan.

Wondering why Mings is still 4.5. Pau Torres comes in, then Mings is at risk of missing out. FPL know something?

I wonder if that's why Botman is also 4.5. Do they know of an imminent NEW signing that will jeopardise his starting status?

-Simms is actually transferring to a championship team - place holder for me atm
- Mings also competing with the CB who was injured all last year (is his name Diogo Costa?) Him and Pau Torres ahead of Mings
- Ferguson might be good to start with... but he and Enciso lose their appeal when Europe starts up for Brighton (GW5-6?). Brighton clearly setting up for rotation up forward
- i saw a stat recently that on a points per minute basis, Martinelli outscored all of the other Arsenal attackers comfortably. Having said that, Saka seems like the nailed on option, or Odegaard if you are inclined (I had both for the last 12 GW last year... Odegaard was great!)
Lots to consider!

 

[Burly]

Enciso + Salah = 5.5 + 12.5 = 18
Bruno + Odegaard = 8.5 + 8.5 = 17
Still not enough. If you punt on Enciso, the only other option is MGW (who might be on PKs). But one week and even that option might be blocked if there’s a price movement in the wrong direction and you’ve kept only 0.5 ITB.

IMO, the equation is really TAA or Salah. That’s where the extra 1.0 has gone. Will TAA continue with his form of 60pts in the last 10 games @ an avg of 6.0 PPM? If so, then that’s around 228 for the year. Not impossible. Salah would then have to get 340 to be the same value. If he’s on par for that, then peeps will be dumping Haaland for him and grabbing Kane with the spare 1.5 units.

I think FPL have thought about this very cunningly. VVD cheaper too. TAA or VVD, then with the extra 2.0, Salah & MGW? Trippier or Botman? 2.0 difference there too.

There’s definitely no right or wrong. It will come down to luck. But balance seems to be the key. If things go wrong, how easily can you get to the 2nd best option?

Don’t get me starting on James and Chilwell. Both enticing at 5.5 and no UCL. As glassy as DCL though.

One school of thought I've seen regarding TAA is that his midfield role may be a thing of the past, due to Liverpool's 2 strong midfield signings - MacAllister and Szoboszlai. Perhaps his scoring may suffer?

 

[The Banker]

FPL has become quite big on the social media stage these days. Heaps of broadcasters out there.

I'm a podcast and numbers nerd and I really like what FPL Fran does because of the graphics and presentation. One of many of the YouTube guys that are good at the game.

Here's his initial thoughts on MID & FWD players...price and fixtures.

View attachment 59386
View attachment 59385
View attachment 59384

DEF & GK thoughts...

 

[Dazza]

Going to give FPL a go this season, a newbie so I’Ii have to read up how it all works

 

[vsberlina]

Hope Pep

One school of thought I've seen regarding TAA is that his midfield role may be a thing of the past, due to Liverpool's 2 strong midfield signings - MacAllister and Szoboszlai. Perhaps his scoring may suffer?

He was taking a lot of the set pieces towards the end, and I don't think that will change.
I've seen a lot of teams with 5 x 5.0-5.5 at the back. There's so many good DEF with chances for CS & attacking returns, it makes sense to get them all, then dump the two fake ones, and decide which 4.0 to get and if you need to upgrade a MID.
Most will hold the free transfer, then do 3 for a -4 hit in GW3 in a mini WC.

Anyway, pre-season will hopefully tell us something. Early games will experiment, but later games will hopefully show the hand.

 

[vsberlina]

DEF & GK thoughts...

I think a 4.5 + 4.0 GK is the consensus. Pickford, & Flekken seem the most popular. Areola could be a starting 4.0.

TAA has the proven record and potential to be a 200 pt DEF. If you start without him and spread the funds, it'll be hard to get him if you need to.
Easier to start with him and downgrade if it doesn't work out.

Lots of good 5.0s. Porro, Estupinan, ARS DEF. Then there's the 5.5s. Shaw, Chilwell, James.

I think starting status is safer at the start. When Europe starts, there will be rotation.
I think many wait until the first international break to WC.
By then, the must have players are known and risky starters can then get dumped.

 

[Connoisseur]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676173292367904769

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678709120982220801

 

[The Banker]

Spent a bit of time working on a draft the past couple of days.

Things of note:
- Have never owned Salah and can't see that changing
- Have come around to plugging in 3 forwards. I can see Nkunku catching fire at some stage. Think he's a decent own to begin if you have the funds. He's a bit easier to hide away on the first couple of fixtures (if you choose) when distributing the funds more evenly.
- Wissa a nice 3rd forward on fixtures in case someone gets off to a hot start at or below his price. Basically the price doesn't rule anyone out. Most will go 4.5 ruling out these options and spending up elsewhere. Hard to argue doing that either.
- Newcastle and Villa are 2 teams that the fixtures turn for at GW5/6. Just think Villa's are better on the whole. Happy to start with Pau and watch Newcastle. Difficult to double up Botman and Trippier, and think the double up is a bit farfetched.
- Talk that Poch wants to run just 4 CB's in the Chelsea squad. See the 4.5 price tag as a cheap way into their defence. Could be Fofana or Colwill.
- No Trent. Can get to him through Bruno or Martinelli. Midfielders at 5.0-5.5 need sorting out over the defensive options imo.
- Emi Martinez placeholder for Onana if he comes in at 5.0

See how much of this stands up after preseason. Would like to see a few playing 6.0 or cheaper forwards to persist with distributing the funds this way.

 

[Under The Dome]

I'll give PL fantasy a run this year.

4 Units left

 

[Dazza]

Luton v Burnley game on 19th of August ( game week 2 ) has been postponed ( something to do with there home pitch )

 

[KLo30]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679898986075893776

View: https://twitter.com/***cout/status/1679898986075893776?s=20

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679906651271299072

View: https://twitter.com/***cout/status/1679906651271299072?s=20

 

[Old Big 'Ead]

Luton v Burnley game on 19th of August ( game week 2 ) has been postponed ( something to do with there home pitch )

This is because it ain't up to PL standards, and won't be by that date. If you get a chance have a look at their stadium. One of the most unique stadiums in the world.

Away entrance goes through backyards to get into the ground

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIlFXkEeZ5o

 

[Ironhawk]

This is because it ain't up to PL standards, and won't be by that date. If you get a chance have a look at their stadium. One of the most unique stadiums in the world.

Away entrance goes through backyards to get into the ground

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIlFXkEeZ5o

I dunno that it's unique. Many of the lower league stadiums are as bad or worse than that, and Luton were a 5th division club a decade ago.

It's a big jump to get the ground to PL standard for any of those clubs, especially financially, a year or two of cash at PL level will help.

 

[Under The Dome]

On 10 Bold tonight is Perth Glory vs West Ham, if you want some preseason watch.

 

[The Banker]

I dunno that it's unique. Many of the lower league stadiums are as bad or worse than that, and Luton were a 5th division club a decade ago.

It's a big jump to get the ground to PL standard for any of those clubs, especially financially, a year or two of cash at PL level will help.

I wouldn't have the faintest if this is correct or not, but a mate at work (English) has mentioned to me in the past that a PL promotion is worth $30mil to the clubs. (might also be pounds too)

 

[tso]

I wouldn't have the faintest if this is correct or not, but a mate at work (English) has mentioned to me in the past that a PL promotion is worth $30mil to the clubs. (might also be pounds too)

From Metro.co.uk

According to Deloitte, promotion to the Premier League can see an increase in revenue of between £135 million and £265 million depending on if the team can avoid an immediate return to the Championship.

 

[Lenny Guildersleeve]

From Metro.co.uk

According to Deloitte, promotion to the Premier League can see an increase in revenue of between £135 million and £265 million depending on if the team can avoid an immediate return to the Championship.

The playoff final is known as the £160 million game.