Landed on this. Im going for players i rate as underpriced. I could probably afford a few extra true guns if i changed structure but im happy with this, mostly.
Am i correct in saying that players who play 3 games in round 1 will have a price change whereas those that play less than 3 wont? If so that adds even more incentive to get the best players who start with 3 games in round 1. That said, there is still reason to pick players with less than 3 games for sure!
I like the balance of my team but i will need several players to perform well above their price point to be competitive. I figure ill have a look at all my players and work out who is going to step up and who i can cut and ill probably use a boost or 2 straight out of the gates if - as im expecting - some of these mid-pricers dont come on.
I like the challenge of giving it a go though instead of picking household names and rookies. With so many trades i can always adjust but i may start slow if the strategy doesnt pay dividends.
Just over 1 Mil in the bank
View attachment 63039