Definitely. A good coach will play the players to the players strengths. Not expect the player to try to adapt to what the coach wants, especially if it is not there natural game.
Yep. I think there are (at least) three types of coaches.
The best who can adapt their game plan to their players' strengths rather than make the players adapt to the game plan.
Their ego doesn't get in the way.
Bellichick did it: won with a passing games, with a running game and with a strong defence.
Andy Reid seems to be another. Sure he's got Mahomes but last year it was the defence that got them through.
So does La Fleur. His whole game plan has changed with Malik at QB.
The next best who make the players adapt to their game plan but still try to play to their players' strengths. And they add/drop players whose strengths fit.
I think Ross Lyon is a prime example. In NFL? Maybe Payton, maybe McCarthy.
Then there are the coaches who, as I see it, want to be known to be good coaches: the ones who seem determined to win in such a way that they get the obvious credit: use odd-ball schemes, don't use the best players for their most suitable plays, play players out of position etc etc
I think Arthur Smith is one of these: note his use of Bijan last year - very few red zone carries and only 2 inside the 5 while the likes of Edwards, Mixon/Mostert had 20.
In the AFL I think Luke Beveridge is another.