lots of blogs rating hill high this coming week I just don’t understand lol
Interesting that.
FantasyPros has Hill ranked #24 WR this week on their ECR (Expert Concensus Rankings) but some other sites has him top-10.
I don't agree with them but it is fairly typical: most pundits don't seem prepared to give up on a proven premium until they have to, i.e. the evidence is overwhelming.
e.g. FantasyPros has C D Lamb as the #1WR this week even though he is the 19th best scorer so far.
Last year he led the league in targets, this year he is 15th.
And it's not just less targets. He has only 13 catches on 24 targets. That's a very poor ration. Rice, for example, has 24/29; Godwin 21/25; Diggs 20/24.
I think the pundits are using the term "positive regression".
Fair enough, it is only three games and Lamb's targets should increase but to rank him above other WRs who have started the season a fair bit better and also have the pedigree?