Opinion Injury/Suspension Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
14 May 2015
Messages
2,048
Likes
1,281
AFL Club
Hawthorn
How good's the mail? lol

Last week I had good mail on KK from Raymagoo on Twitter.
The mail is usually pretty solid. It might not be enough to keep him out of the team but it's enough to stop me slapping the VC on him Friday night personally. Having said that, it wouldn't be the first time someone has played sore and dominated. Sometimes ignorance is bliss!
 

Goodie's Guns

Leadership Group
Joined
21 May 2012
Messages
22,312
Likes
31,158
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Brisbane Lions defender Justin Clarke has announced his retirement from AFL.

The 22-year-old backman made the decision after experiencing ongoing symptoms from a concussion suffered two months ago.

Clarke suffered a head knock at training on January 18, falling to the ground heavily after a pack mark contest and was ruled out of football indefinitely.

Lions medical staff have worked closely with concussion specialists in Melbourne to run a series of tests as Clarke's symptoms continued and he remained away from training.

Clarke travelled to Melbourne late last week for a final meeting with his specialist, before informing the playing group in person this morning of his decision to retire after 56 Senior games for the Lions.

http://www.lions.com.au/news/2016-03-31/clarkes-future
 
Joined
10 Feb 2014
Messages
11,375
Likes
21,228
AFL Club
Essendon
Brisbane Lions defender Justin Clarke has announced his retirement from AFL.

The 22-year-old backman made the decision after experiencing ongoing symptoms from a concussion suffered two months ago.

Clarke suffered a head knock at training on January 18, falling to the ground heavily after a pack mark contest and was ruled out of football indefinitely.

Lions medical staff have worked closely with concussion specialists in Melbourne to run a series of tests as Clarke's symptoms continued and he remained away from training.

Clarke travelled to Melbourne late last week for a final meeting with his specialist, before informing the playing group in person this morning of his decision to retire after 56 Senior games for the Lions.

http://www.lions.com.au/news/2016-03-31/clarkes-future
Poor bloke. Good luck to him.
 
Joined
31 Dec 2014
Messages
544
Likes
304
AFL Club
Collingwood
Shame about Justin Clarke. He was a pretty handy player in my opinion (the real thing, not SC). Apparently he's a smart young chap though academically with a bright future ahead of him. Good luck to him.
 

IDIG

Leadership Group
Joined
8 Mar 2012
Messages
35,325
Likes
20,502
AFL Club
Essendon
Joined
4 Mar 2015
Messages
675
Likes
375
AFL Club
Bulldogs
That makes it an awfully difficult decision.

1 week is usually a no trade, change in role and tagging is usually the end of his scoring potential.

Thankfully i'm not an owner as i have no idea what i'd do!
Yeah I'm 50/50 on this, not sure I believe that it will only be 1 week as well! Leaning towards trading though, I have all the right rookies except Papley so might only have to do 1 trade next week.
 
Joined
24 Apr 2013
Messages
11,173
Likes
13,044
AFL Club
Carlton
RICHMOND coach Damien Hardwick has ruled out important pair Brett Deledio and Ivan Maric for Friday night's clash against Collingwood at the MCG.
And both could be looking at VFL returns in the coming weeks after extended periods out of full training.
Deledio was sidelined through the pre-season with a quadricep injury, while Maric was restricted going into round one by a back problem.
Hardwick also confirmed Shane Edwards would miss round two with a fractured hand.
 

The Phoenix

Rising Star Nominee
Joined
26 Mar 2013
Messages
195
Likes
8
AFL Club
Richmond
Joined
18 Sep 2014
Messages
848
Likes
493
AFL Club
Fremantle
RICHMOND coach Damien Hardwick has ruled out important pair Brett Deledio and Ivan Maric for Friday night's clash against Collingwood at the MCG.
And both could be looking at VFL returns in the coming weeks after extended periods out of full training.
Deledio was sidelined through the pre-season with a quadricep injury, while Maric was restricted going into round one by a back problem.
Hardwick also confirmed Shane Edwards would miss round two with a fractured hand.
As a Collingwood supporter I am happy about this. We need everything to go our way to turn around what happened last weekend. I'm expecting multiple changes.
 

THCLT

BBL|05 Winner
Joined
13 Sep 2014
Messages
18,596
Likes
118,260
AFL Club
North Melb.
RICHMOND coach Damien Hardwick has ruled out important pair Brett Deledio and Ivan Maric for Friday night's clash against Collingwood at the MCG.
And both could be looking at VFL returns in the coming weeks after extended periods out of full training.
Deledio was sidelined through the pre-season with a quadricep injury, while Maric was restricted going into round one by a back problem.
Hardwick also confirmed Shane Edwards would miss round two with a fractured hand.
Downside to this is that it doesn't give us anything conclusive about how the likes of C Ellis, C Menadue or D Rioli fit in and whether they have cemented a spot in the 22.
 
Joined
9 Feb 2015
Messages
492
Likes
357
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Wouldn't look into much re: Robinson tagging. I remember when Rockliff tagged Mitchell round 1, got suspended for a week, causing people to jump off. Then went on to average 130+? Besides, Robinson was on track for a team high score whilst "tagging" Priddis. If he's due back in Round 3, I can't understand why people would trade him. If one thing I've learned over the years, it's unnecessary sideways trading. You gain 1, possibly 2 weeks of difference in scores between Robinson's replacement and one of your bench forward rookies. I understand that Robinson is an ultra POD, and people are worried about him being a negative POD. But think ahead to round 16, when you're out of trades, and you have loophole rookies and others missing through LTIs. You'll be wishing you had the extra trade then #CaptainHindsight :p
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,137
Likes
64,919
AFL Club
Melbourne
Posted this in trades but should post here as well...Robinson looks like he will be back round 3 but may go back to tagging.
https://mobile.twitter.com/MitchRobinson05/status/714756188047585280
That makes it an awfully difficult decision.

1 week is usually a no trade, change in role and tagging is usually the end of his scoring potential.

Thankfully i'm not an owner as i have no idea what i'd do!
Yeah I'm 50/50 on this, not sure I believe that it will only be 1 week as well! Leaning towards trading though, I have all the right rookies except Papley so might only have to do 1 trade next week.
Hopefully he's poor tagging job on Priddis has proven he's better used elsewhere...like running free with the mids but a calf is a calf so he may end up just taking it easy in the forward pocket doing nothing...tagging Danger well :rolleyes:.
Wouldn't look into much re: Robinson tagging. I remember when Rockliff tagged Mitchell round 1, got suspended for a week, causing people to jump off. Then went on to average 130+? Besides, Robinson was on track for a team high score whilst "tagging" Priddis. If he's due back in Round 3, I can't understand why people would trade him. If one thing I've learned over the years, it's unnecessary sideways trading. You gain 1, possibly 2 weeks of difference in scores between Robinson's replacement and one of your bench forward rookies. I understand that Robinson is an ultra POD, and people are worried about him being a negative POD. But think ahead to round 16, when you're out of trades, and you have loophole rookies and others missing through LTIs. You'll be wishing you had the extra trade then #CaptainHindsight :p
People need to understand the difference between "tagging" and "running with", mainly because in SC terms, there is a huge world of difference!
Robbo wasn't tagging Priddis, he running with him, hence Robbo collected quite a few possessions for the amount of time he spent on the field, and was on track to be one of Brisbanes highest scorers in the game.

Tagging is a completely negative role. You sacrifice your own game, and even position in a contest, to stop the tagged player getting to the ball. You've all seen Crowley do it. For 90% of the time he had no interest in getting the ball himself, he was just interested in his opponent not getting it. Standing between him, and where he wants to be. Bumping him, scragging him, retarding him at every opportunity. He has only one goal. My opponent will not get the ball!

Run With is a completely competitive role. The Run With player has the attitude "you and me buddy, let's see who gets the ball this time!" 90% of the time he won't play himself out of position at a contest, just to stop his opponent getting the ball, he will strive for the best position possible, to get the ball himself. If and when the opportunity presents itself, he will run off that player and be creative, where as a hard tag is far less likely to do that. The Run With players first goal is "I want to win the ball in this contest, his second goal is "if I can't win it, I'm really going to give my opponent a hard time, and put him under pressure if he does get it". The Run With player can be negating, and sacrifice his own game, some of the time , the Tagger does it all of the time.

Being a run with player might, depending on the opponent and circumstances, restrict his SC score by 5 to 15 points/game. Being a tagger means you rarely score above 60 or 70.

I wouldn't be trading Robbo, if you are scared Run With roles will make his SC drop too much. He was on track to score something in the 90's and be Brisbane's leading possession getter, in what was probably not his best game, when he injured his calf. He had 23 possessions in 66% TOG, and at the end of the game, Bell was Brisbane's leading possession gatherer with 24. Taggers are never, EVER, leading possession getters, or anywhere near it. Further proof he wasn't tagging Priddis, but running with him.
I would, however, be considering trading Robbo, if Rockliff's claim earlier in the week, that Beams might be back in Round 4 or 5 is believed to be true. That will have a far greater affect on Robbo's SC than a run with role will.
 

Bomber18

Leadership Group
Joined
11 Nov 2012
Messages
27,409
Likes
65,138
AFL Club
Essendon
Seems like Hallahan is on the LTI list.
https://t.co/RawM4Z7ZN9

Darcy Mac downgrade hopefully !

I think Swan out makes J.Smith a likely elevation prospect. Hopefully, he's also another downgrade target for the likes of Oliver, Davis, Hewett, Gresham, Dunkley.
 
Joined
4 Mar 2015
Messages
675
Likes
375
AFL Club
Bulldogs
People need to understand the difference between "tagging" and "running with", mainly because in SC terms, there is a huge world of difference!
Robbo wasn't tagging Priddis, he running with him, hence Robbo collected quite a few possessions for the amount of time he spent on the field, and was on track to be one of Brisbanes highest scorers in the game.

Tagging is a completely negative role. You sacrifice your own game, and even position in a contest, to stop the tagged player getting to the ball. You've all seen Crowley do it. For 90% of the time he had no interest in getting the ball himself, he was just interested in his opponent not getting it. Standing between him, and where he wants to be. Bumping him, scragging him, retarding him at every opportunity. He has only one goal. My opponent will not get the ball!

Run With is a completely competitive role. The Run With player has the attitude "you and me buddy, let's see who gets the ball this time!" 90% of the time he won't play himself out of position at a contest, just to stop his opponent getting the ball, he will strive for the best position possible, to get the ball himself. If and when the opportunity presents itself, he will run off that player and be creative, where as a hard tag is far less likely to do that. The Run With players first goal is "I want to win the ball in this contest, his second goal is "if I can't win it, I'm really going to give my opponent a hard time, and put him under pressure if he does get it". The Run With player can be negating, and sacrifice his own game, some of the time , the Tagger does it all of the time.

Being a run with player might, depending on the opponent and circumstances, restrict his SC score by 5 to 15 points/game. Being a tagger means you rarely score above 60 or 70.

I wouldn't be trading Robbo, if you are scared Run With roles will make his SC drop too much. He was on track to score something in the 90's and be Brisbane's leading possession getter, in what was probably not his best game, when he injured his calf. He had 23 possessions in 66% TOG, and at the end of the game, Bell was Brisbane's leading possession gatherer with 24. Taggers are never, EVER, leading possession getters, or anywhere near it. Further proof he wasn't tagging Priddis, but running with him.
I would, however, be considering trading Robbo, if Rockliff's claim earlier in the week, that Beams might be back in Round 4 or 5 is believed to be true. That will have a far greater affect on Robbo's SC than a run with role will.
Thanks Rowsus, another very informative post. I wasn't watching the game, but heard on Twitter that Robbo was tagging Priddis. I may have just misread that and they could have been saying he was running with Priddis, my mistake if it was that. He did still go quite well though I guess. Like you said, Beams could be coming back in round 4-5 which could drop his score down a bit. I am still completely 50/50 on him. If I do trade, I think it would be to a Wingard/S Gray type. Do you think it is worth a trade? I have all the right rookies except maybe Papley, but I'll see how he goes this week.
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,137
Likes
64,919
AFL Club
Melbourne
Thanks Rowsus, another very informative post. I wasn't watching the game, but heard on Twitter that Robbo was tagging Priddis. I may have just misread that and they could have been saying he was running with Priddis, my mistake if it was that. He did still go quite well though I guess. Like you said, Beams could be coming back in round 4-5 which could drop his score down a bit. I am still completely 50/50 on him. If I do trade, I think it would be to a Wingard/S Gray type. Do you think it is worth a trade? I have all the right rookies except maybe Papley, but I'll see how he goes this week.
You probably didn't misread it, they probably said "tagging" but were wrong. It's a little bit like the difference between "possession" and "disposal". So many people say "Priddis had 40 possessions today, 15 kicks and 25 handballs!". We know what they mean, but chances are they are technically wrong! Priddis might have had 45 possessions, we don't know, but we do know from that statement he had 40 (legal) disposals! Just like people use possession, when they are really meaning disposal, people use tagging, when they really mean running with. Of course, there are sometimes they just don't know the difference! ;)

As to trading Robbo, the whole lynch-pin of me picking him was Beams was out for a long period. As that is probably not the case now, I will trade him. If you are in a similar position, either of Wingard or S Gray sound like good replacements.
 
Joined
31 Mar 2014
Messages
2,909
Likes
2,122
AFL Club
Brisbane
Brisbane Lions defender Justin Clarke has announced his retirement from AFL.

The 22-year-old backman made the decision after experiencing ongoing symptoms from a concussion suffered two months ago.

Clarke suffered a head knock at training on January 18, falling to the ground heavily after a pack mark contest and was ruled out of football indefinitely.

Lions medical staff have worked closely with concussion specialists in Melbourne to run a series of tests as Clarke's symptoms continued and he remained away from training.

Clarke travelled to Melbourne late last week for a final meeting with his specialist, before informing the playing group in person this morning of his decision to retire after 56 Senior games for the Lions.

http://www.lions.com.au/news/2016-03-31/clarkes-future
Very sad, he was a great prospect.
 
Joined
25 Jan 2013
Messages
1,570
Likes
1,373
AFL Club
Essendon
Brisbane Lions defender Justin Clarke has announced his retirement from AFL.

The 22-year-old backman made the decision after experiencing ongoing symptoms from a concussion suffered two months ago.

Clarke suffered a head knock at training on January 18, falling to the ground heavily after a pack mark contest and was ruled out of football indefinitely.

Lions medical staff have worked closely with concussion specialists in Melbourne to run a series of tests as Clarke's symptoms continued and he remained away from training.

Clarke travelled to Melbourne late last week for a final meeting with his specialist, before informing the playing group in person this morning of his decision to retire after 56 Senior games for the Lions.

http://www.lions.com.au/news/2016-03-31/clarkes-future
Poor bloke. Good luck to him.
Shame about Justin Clarke. He was a pretty handy player in my opinion (the real thing, not SC). Apparently he's a smart young chap though academically with a bright future ahead of him. Good luck to him.
Very sad, he was a great prospect.
Agree with all of you, he had 200 gamer written all over him. Hopefully he recovers and can continue with his life. Hoping to do a PhD in supersonic research so he must be a very intelligent man.

Coincidentally, just watched 'Concussion' last night. Gives you perspective on how easy it is to overlook the damage that contact sport can cause to the human body - especially the brain - while we sit enthralled by the beauty of sport. We just weren't built to keep taking hits to the head. Clarke seems to have escaped from the clutches of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy aka Boxer's Dementia but I wonder how many past and present players are secretly struggling with CTE. Quite scary to imagine. Great movie, by the way!

Remember my mum not letting me play footy when I was younger coz she was scared I'd get smashed. I always say if she had let me play then, I'd be running around for Essendon with number 5 on my back with a Brownlow and Norm smith medal around my neck and a premiership cup to boot. Maybe I should be more thankful she didn't let me play hahaha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top