So you’re saying they are both great picks?
What about Sloane vs M.Crouch then?
M Crouch:
Adelaide Oval: 107.05 from 22 (7/22 below 100, 8/22 120+)
2017: 108.58 from 12
2018: 105.2 from 10
Adelaide Oval Wins: 109 from 16 (4/16 below 100, 7/16 120+)
2017: 111.33 from 9
2018: 106 from 7
Adelaide Oval Losses: 101.83 from 6 (3/6 below 100, 1/6 120+)
2017: 100.33 from 3
2018: 103.33 from 3
Wins: 108.63 from 24 (7/24 below 100, 10/24 120+)
2017: 111 from 15
2018: 104.67 from 9
Losses
: 102.33 from 15 (6/15 below 100, 2/15 120+)
2017: 108.17 from 6
2018: 98.44 from 9
2018:
Disposals: 32.22
SC Avg when disposals equal/exceed 33: 111.71 from 7 (low of 100 and a high of 131, 2/7 120+)
SC Avg when disposals below 33: 95.09 from 11 (low of 51 and a high of 126, 6/11 below 100, 2/11 120+)
Contested Possessions: 12.72
SC Avg when contested possessions equal/exceed 13: 113.56 from 9 (low of 100 and a high of 131, 0/9 below 100, 2/9 120+)
SC Avg when contested possessions below 13: 89.56 from 9 (low of 51 and a high of 122, 6/9 below 100, 1/9 120+)
Tackles: 3.89
SC Avg when tackles equal/exceed 4: 113.67 from 9 (low of 92 and a high of 131, 2/9 below 100, 4/9 120+)
SC Avg when tackles below 4: 89.44 from 9 (low of 51 and a high of 107, 4/9 below 100)
Time on Ground%: 75.8%
SC Avg when time on ground equals/exceeds 76%: 105.67 from 15 (low of 68 and a high of 131, 4/15 below 100, 4/15 120+)
SC Avg when time on ground below 76%: 81 from 3 (low of 51 and a high of 100, 2/3 below 100)
Crouch's difference to Sloane is that his scoring is dependent on his game (ability to gather 30+) whereas Sloane is dependent on the team's success and both should be great selections but my preference would be R Sloane.