Discussion Re-Signings, Retirements, Delistings, Trade & Drafting

Joined
13 Mar 2016
Messages
1,949
Likes
6,562
AFL Club
West Coast
I think Kelly picked WC because they were the stronger of the 2 WA clubs, closer in terms of premiership glory and maybe he didn't like Ross Lyons coaching?
You would expect so... for the same reason you don't see anyone requesting to be traded to the weaker VIC clubs either, they need to rely on Free Agency and even then with heaps of cash to splash around cant attract quality players...

It could also be that he has a particular dislike for someone at Freo.. who knows and who cares, it doesnt matter
 
Joined
13 Apr 2012
Messages
6,029
Likes
15,788
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
I think Kelly picked WC because they were the stronger of the 2 WA clubs, closer in terms of premiership glory and maybe he didn't like Ross Lyons coaching?
And that’s what most people have a problem with, you can’t say I need to go home in one breath, but I’ll only play for the more successful side in the state with the next.

You need to get home you pick your state and be bloody thankful if your current club can get you there.
 
Joined
7 Jul 2012
Messages
11,793
Likes
34,955
AFL Club
West Coast
Well, I guess we can agree to disagree. If you can't see the difference between a player that will absolutely require more than a top 4 or 5 pick to get traded, and a player that might be lucky to attract something in the 20’s or 30’s as a trade, then whole conversation is moot. I really think the “anti WC” card is being overplayed. Maybe if you lived over here, you’d see that the large majority of us are anti every club up to a certain point, except the club we support.
Absolutely we can have different opinions. No problem with that at all.

Not questioning Kelly's worth, (Have never said we should get him for anything other than a fair price for that matter) Just how the outrage definitely seems more when West Coast is involved at times. What was the difference when a contracted Dramafield wanted a trade home to Geelong to be near family... No outrage at all when he noninated just 1 club out of 10 Victorian clubs. He was an even bigger name than Kelly yet no outrage like there has been in Kelly's case.
 

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,692
Likes
68,042
AFL Club
Melbourne
I suggest we just put it to bed.
Everyone seems to think the other side of the conversation is discounting their point of view. Maybe it’s right, maybe it’s not, but I definitely can’t see one side of the discussion getting the other side of the discussion to concede anything, so ......... at least from my point of view, I’m out.
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
39,519
Likes
128,646
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
I suggest we just put it to bed.
Everyone seems to think the other side of the conversation is discounting their point of view. Maybe it’s right, maybe it’s not, but I definitely can’t see one side of the discussion getting the other side of the discussion to concede anything, so ......... at least from my point of view, I’m out.
Hear, Hear. With the emergence of social media, etc the "Everyone seems to think the other side of the conversation is discounting their point of view " has featured very prominently but everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I don't see the need to have everyone constantly in agreeance or the need to try and sway others.

Would be interesting to hear the thoughts on a hypothetical situation regarding a QLD player at another state (Vic, Sa, etc) utilising the same situation with T Kelly except replacing WC with Brisbane and Fremantle with Gold Coast.
 
Joined
7 Jul 2012
Messages
11,793
Likes
34,955
AFL Club
West Coast
I think Kelly picked WC because they were the stronger of the 2 WA clubs, closer in terms of premiership glory and maybe he didn't like Ross Lyons coaching?
His situation is pretty unique. Being that he got drafted alot later than most players do, His window to achieve success is a lot shorter.

West Coast are in a Premiership window right now also having won the Premiership last year. Freo are very much rebuilding and losing even more quality players like B.Hill & Langdon this off-season. Also have no coach at the moment nor a CEO and their direction at this point in time is not clear. Not to say they won't turn it around because they definitely will (but how long that takes compared to walking straight into West Coast is unclear), West Coast is definitely the more attractive club at the moment.

Have no doubt Freo could offer more money than West Coast, and will likely have better picks to offer, But as I outlined earlier, Kelly has a closer connection to West Coast considering the work we put into him.

He had a few options last year, Ask for a trade (which he did) or sign a longer deal. Once he decided he wanted a trade... He chose to ask to go to West Coast. We tried to do a deal and offered what looked like a fair deal, but like I said before, I think Geelong would have refused any deal, trying to keep a gun player on their list at a bargain basement price.

The situation is different this year as he is now out of contract and can leave via the draft if Geelong want to continue playing silly buggers. I do think a deal will get done though but I wouldn't be surprised if the AFL have to get involved via mediation.

West Coast is a very fair club to deal with trade wise historically, and Geelong up until this case has generally been as well.
 
Joined
16 Jun 2013
Messages
5,509
Likes
11,437
AFL Club
Adelaide
And that’s what most people have a problem with, you can’t say I need to go home in one breath, but I’ll only play for the more successful side in the state with the next.

You need to get home you pick your state and be bloody thankful if your current club can get you there.
Agree - you get drafted, you play your best for that club and if you want out, the club that drafted you can dispose of you how they want on their terms. Players have too many rights and expect everything these days. Go home when you retire in your 30s and be happy you played AFL at all.
 
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
785
Likes
1,660
AFL Club
Geelong
No I didn't miss the point. I do get that Victorian point of view. But I (and many other over here) reckon the outrage was due to him nominating West Coast. People just did not want Kelly coming to West Coast.

As Spots said... It's well known now that West Coast had put a fair bit of work into him in 2017 and was going to pick him up in the second round. Through a few different unforseen circumstances (Brander still unbelievably available at 13, Oscar Allen still at 21), We thought he'd still be available at 26 due to his family situation and him telling clubs he did not want to go East for that reason. Geelong took the risk, knowing his situation and preferences, and can't be upset at his request to come home.

We had been in constant contact with him for a few years and that is one reason why he wanted to come to West Coast last year. Freo did not show much interest in him until he had played his rookie season and starred... so that helps explain why he nominated us. He (or his manager) did make a mistake by completely ruling out Freo last year, had he publicly still had Freo in the conversation he might have got to West Coast. But the belief over here is Geelong where playing games last year, and would not have traded him under any circumstances.

If he wanted to come home (regardless of the reasons)... Why should he have to accept playing at a club that showed no interest in him previously and where he would not be happy. When there was another club in his home state that was a more attractive destination in a premiership window.

The family reason is not secondary... Never was... It was the sole reason. He said he loves the Geelong club and if the Geelong cats where in Perth he'd play for them here. But they aren't and he just simply didn't want to go to Freo under any circumstances.

The outrage was over the top. And my post this morning was just pointing out the very same thing (Players nominating a destination in a different state) yet those instances don't get any outrage at all.

Nick Riewoldt just a few weeks ago had a tantrum on TV saying Kelly should just go to which of our two clubs had the best picks.... I was pointing out there is no sign of him when Non-Victorian clubs players like Keath nominate just his club... Why no outrage that if Keath wants to move home that there are 9 other Victorian clubs, many with better picks than St.Kilda. Just eerie silence from him and the press.

Geelong have done very well lately paying unders for Dramafield, Unders for Ablett... No outrage when both of them only nominated Geelong was there? Both should have just accepted any Victorian club if they wanted to really get home to Victoria... Regardless of where they preferred to go. But no they got to choose where they wanted to go and got to Geelong without the outrage that has been directed at Kelly and West Coast.
No offence mate but this is just some state vs state mentality rubbish. Personally, my only thoughts about the Tim Kelly saga are...

Geelong poached him from under the Eagles nose, so Geelong must have known that there was a possibility he'd return home at some point.
Geelong still gave Kelly the chance to shine and although I don't think he owes the club the world lol, it would have been nice if he had agreed to play up the Freo angle to give the cats some ground on which to bargain.

So sick of supporters on both sides talking up his family situation as if they actually care, if he was a dud player no one would be screaming FAMILY SUPPORT! from rafters in every sentence where his name is mentioned.

He is a good player, he will get back home, no dramas. W.A people always playing the victim card is getting rather tiresome across many issues.
 
Last edited:
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
49,510
Likes
113,006
AFL Club
Collingwood
Where’s the facepalm emoji? Oh there it is ?‍♀️ ?‍♂️
What is going on Drew ? I thought getting rid of Pyke would have solved most things , I might have to listen to Crowey again.

Do you even have enough picks in the Draft to cover all theses exits ?
 
Joined
13 Mar 2016
Messages
1,949
Likes
6,562
AFL Club
West Coast
So sick of supporters on both sides talking up his family situation as if they actually care, if he was a dud player no one would be screaming FAMILY SUPPORT! from rafters in every sentence where his name is mentioned.
if he was a dud player no-one on either side would care either way so that point of view isn’t relevant
 
Joined
13 Mar 2016
Messages
1,949
Likes
6,562
AFL Club
West Coast
Agree - you get drafted, you play your best for that club and if you want out, the club that drafted you can dispose of you how they want on their terms. Players have too many rights and expect everything these days. Go home when you retire in your 30s and be happy you played AFL at all.
In a perfect world this works but the players are real people, they get drafted by teams in different states, different regions and most don’t get the luxury of retiring at 30... the general population gets to pick their employer, but because they’re a footballer they have to simply accept what they get for their whole career?
 
Joined
9 Mar 2012
Messages
10,825
Likes
16,278
AFL Club
Adelaide
What is going on Drew ? I thought getting rid of Pyke would have solved most things , I might have to listen to Crowey again.

Do you even have enough picks in the Draft to cover all theses exits ?
Well David Mackay has resigned Herbie..........
 
Top