Discussion Re-Signings, Retirements, Delistings, Trade & Drafting

Spots

Spots

#2,005
Joined
13 Mar 2016
Messages
1,810
Likes
5,993
AFL Club
West Coast
#2,005
PC said:
Listening to trade radio - gee they are scratching for stuff to talk about...
Click to expand...
I'm a bit annoyed with Sam MacLure saying the Swans are going to wind up looking bad if they can't get the Daniher deal done... sure they convinced Daniher to want the trade but Bombers wanting considerable overs surely doesnt make the Swans look bad...
 
Spots

Spots

#2,010
Joined
13 Mar 2016
Messages
1,810
Likes
5,993
AFL Club
West Coast
#2,010
Bomber18 said:
Seeing the comments, most Don supporters seem happy for us to keep Joe and reject the hypothetical 5 and 9 that’s not even on the table.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184240247380439040
Click to expand...
Yes its interesting, I did see that...

If I was Swans though I'd be really reluctant to put those trades up for a bloke with his history but you have to look at it from both sides... Swans already have a KPF so arent desperate (yet) for a new one, whereas Bombers don't really have a replacement option so don't really want the trade
 
Bomber18

Bomber18

Leadership Group
#2,015
Joined
11 Nov 2012
Messages
27,409
Likes
65,138
AFL Club
Essendon
#2,015
Spots said:
Yes its interesting, I did see that...

If I was Swans though I'd be really reluctant to put those trades up for a bloke with his history but you have to look at it from both sides... Swans already have a KPF so arent desperate (yet) for a new one, whereas Bombers don't really have a replacement option so don't really want the trade
Click to expand...
Yeah that’s really what it boils down to. Given their respective lists, there is real no middle point on this trade.
 
Professor

Professor

#2,019
Joined
9 Aug 2012
Messages
40,129
Likes
151,435
AFL Club
Carlton
#2,019
Trade radio via Sam Edmund, that Bonar unlikely to Essendon due to deal for Cutler, puts North in box seat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top