Discussion SC BBL|11: Diabolical wins $25k major prize...!!!
- Thread starter Ben's Beasts
- Start date
2/322 (Russell)
I've just figured out how I can get Bazley's score here (not yet counted): trade loophole Garton back in! Then I an still get Marsh and the equation becomes 104 + Garton vs Tye x3... I think I'm more inclined to take the bird in the hand when it's put like that!
EDIT: just confirming that the loophole remains in place so nobody asks Herbie about it again
I've just figured out how I can get Bazley's score here (not yet counted): trade loophole Garton back in! Then I an still get Marsh and the equation becomes 104 + Garton vs Tye x3... I think I'm more inclined to take the bird in the hand when it's put like that!
EDIT: just confirming that the loophole remains in place so nobody asks Herbie about it again
Last edited:
- Joined
- 4 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 839
- Likes
- 2,748
- AFL Club
- North Melb.
Just wondering if anyone knows the answer to the below
I've made 2 trades for the round
Garton -> Maxwell
Khan -> Stoinis
Was saving my 3rd trade to go Vince to M.Marsh tomorrow but have Bazley's 104 on the pine so was thinking of going Vince -> Garton and then swapping him and Curran to take Bazleys score
Does BBL SC work like AFL SC where the trade wont register as Garton was in my team pre trades so i will still have 1 trade left after getting him back in? Or will Vince to Garton count as a trade. Any help would be appreciated heaps
I've made 2 trades for the round
Garton -> Maxwell
Khan -> Stoinis
Was saving my 3rd trade to go Vince to M.Marsh tomorrow but have Bazley's 104 on the pine so was thinking of going Vince -> Garton and then swapping him and Curran to take Bazleys score
Does BBL SC work like AFL SC where the trade wont register as Garton was in my team pre trades so i will still have 1 trade left after getting him back in? Or will Vince to Garton count as a trade. Any help would be appreciated heaps
2/322 (Russell)
I've just figured out how I can get Bazley's score here (not yet counted): trade loophole Garton back in! Then I an still get Marsh and the equation becomes 104 + Garton vs Tye x3... I think I'm more inclined to take the bird in the hand when it's put like that!
EDIT: just confirming that the loophole remains in place so nobody asks Herbie about it again
I've just figured out how I can get Bazley's score here (not yet counted): trade loophole Garton back in! Then I an still get Marsh and the equation becomes 104 + Garton vs Tye x3... I think I'm more inclined to take the bird in the hand when it's put like that!
EDIT: just confirming that the loophole remains in place so nobody asks Herbie about it again
- Joined
- 4 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 839
- Likes
- 2,748
- AFL Club
- North Melb.
Wife's team
3/338 - Maxwell
Finished: Richo (37), Bartlett (34), Duckett (11)
To come: Maxwell (c), Russell, Larkin, Marsh, Munro, Philippe, Curran, Vince
Projected 739
Rowsus team
3/292 - Maxwell
Finished: Sams (41), Richo (37), Bartlett (34)
To come: Maxwell (c), Larkin, Marsh, Tye, A Agar, Philippe, Curran, Hughes
Projected 721
3/338 - Maxwell
Finished: Richo (37), Bartlett (34), Duckett (11)
To come: Maxwell (c), Russell, Larkin, Marsh, Munro, Philippe, Curran, Vince
Projected 739
Rowsus team
3/292 - Maxwell
Finished: Sams (41), Richo (37), Bartlett (34)
To come: Maxwell (c), Larkin, Marsh, Tye, A Agar, Philippe, Curran, Hughes
Projected 721
2/322 (Russell)
I've just figured out how I can get Bazley's score here (not yet counted): trade loophole Garton back in! Then I an still get Marsh and the equation becomes 104 + Garton vs Tye x3... I think I'm more inclined to take the bird in the hand when it's put like that!
EDIT: just confirming that the loophole remains in place so nobody asks Herbie about it again
I've just figured out how I can get Bazley's score here (not yet counted): trade loophole Garton back in! Then I an still get Marsh and the equation becomes 104 + Garton vs Tye x3... I think I'm more inclined to take the bird in the hand when it's put like that!
EDIT: just confirming that the loophole remains in place so nobody asks Herbie about it again
Interesting , had a quick think for the Round 4-6 block last night.
9 Trades to use
Renshaw + 3 Heat (minimum) + 3 Hurricanes (minimum) leaves 2
Actually only have 5 players that I want to trade out though.
Was hoping to upgrade 2-3 bench positions during this period but with Faridoun & Hughes that certainly won't be happening.
Fun and games finding the 4 players to trade out that I don't want too.
Might mean getting 6 Scorchers next round for extra trade out options.
Could mean missing out on a couple of gifts that could be soon appearing though.
Wonder if others are going to have concerns with the players they need to trade out.
9 Trades to use
Renshaw + 3 Heat (minimum) + 3 Hurricanes (minimum) leaves 2
Actually only have 5 players that I want to trade out though.
Was hoping to upgrade 2-3 bench positions during this period but with Faridoun & Hughes that certainly won't be happening.
Fun and games finding the 4 players to trade out that I don't want too.
Might mean getting 6 Scorchers next round for extra trade out options.
Could mean missing out on a couple of gifts that could be soon appearing though.
Wonder if others are going to have concerns with the players they need to trade out.
@Professor
What's happening with the Pakistani involvement in the BBL ?
Any more stories over the last few days ?
What's happening with the Pakistani involvement in the BBL ?
Any more stories over the last few days ?
I think the key is not to get too attached to players in your team
BBL is much different to normal AFL SC the ability to 'upgrade' bench players is much more difficult unless you really get a bolter like MShort or may be Couch more so MShort due to such high and quick price increase.
I think if you identify a player on a DGR that you 'must have' it is often a case of get them in no matter who you need to trade out, at least that is how I approach BBL SC, which is different to AFL SC.
The problems are really going to come when you are trying to get both Wade and DShort for the hurricanes DGR as both players are likely to be 190k plus, so it might be worth ditching a MMarsh this week and getting one now at 162k for Wade, MMarsh is not likely to have a significant price movement this week (not going to go up beyond 150k) whereas Wade could well be $180k plus after this week.
The other problem of course is that several Stars palyers whom have post significant $ losses and will continue to loose $. It may be a case that one needs to trade a Curran to one of DShort/Wade at their DGR, but unless you have a significant $ bank you are not going to be able to do a DreRuss/Maxy/Stoinis to Wade/DShort.
I was going to get MMarsh in this week for Kerr, but may do Garton to Wade this week. I know it is a big call to commit to Wade 3-4 rounds out, but if you want him for the DGR might be better to pay 162k now rather than 190k+ in 2 weeks.
BBL is much different to normal AFL SC the ability to 'upgrade' bench players is much more difficult unless you really get a bolter like MShort or may be Couch more so MShort due to such high and quick price increase.
I think if you identify a player on a DGR that you 'must have' it is often a case of get them in no matter who you need to trade out, at least that is how I approach BBL SC, which is different to AFL SC.
The problems are really going to come when you are trying to get both Wade and DShort for the hurricanes DGR as both players are likely to be 190k plus, so it might be worth ditching a MMarsh this week and getting one now at 162k for Wade, MMarsh is not likely to have a significant price movement this week (not going to go up beyond 150k) whereas Wade could well be $180k plus after this week.
The other problem of course is that several Stars palyers whom have post significant $ losses and will continue to loose $. It may be a case that one needs to trade a Curran to one of DShort/Wade at their DGR, but unless you have a significant $ bank you are not going to be able to do a DreRuss/Maxy/Stoinis to Wade/DShort.
I was going to get MMarsh in this week for Kerr, but may do Garton to Wade this week. I know it is a big call to commit to Wade 3-4 rounds out, but if you want him for the DGR might be better to pay 162k now rather than 190k+ in 2 weeks.
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 19,077
- Likes
- 80,356
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Finch may not be available for the Rengades next match on 22 December.
https://www.cricket.com.au/news/aar...scorchers-marvel-stadium-kfc-bbl11/2021-12-14
https://www.cricket.com.au/news/aar...scorchers-marvel-stadium-kfc-bbl11/2021-12-14