Isn't the Score Involvement (SI) metric best used to compare scores in progress during DGR rounds, but not averaging total SI's once the DGR players have played twice?
In this round for example, the SI metric allows us to compare the average SI across the players in our teams against each other before the Melbourne Stars played twice, but as soon as they've played their second game it becomes much less relevant.
At the end of the round everyone will have varying numbers of players having been involved in the score due to different numbers of DGR players, so the average SI metric becomes skewed and not comparable.
Is this how everyone else reads it?