BBL|12: Combined SCS Team

[bunlit]

Just a quick one with the loop scenario, there is a possibility of looping one of Renshaw/Bazley with Sams instead, it’s basically a decision of whether we want to lock in Short or Sams score. I’d back Short over Sams but open to discussion

 

[Darkie]

Just a quick one with the loop scenario, there is a possibility of looping one of Renshaw/Bazley with Sams instead, it’s basically a decision of whether we want to lock in Short or Sams score. I’d back Short over Sams but open to discussion

I like this suggestion. I hadn’t spotted it (maybe because I don’t have Sams!), but I’d much rather lock in Short’s score than Sams’.

I reckon we do it.

Fortunately Abbott went big, so we can C Hardie, and have a clean BAT loop (not linked to the VC loop).

 

[Ironhawk]

So Short on field, one of Renshaw/Bazley as E, Sams benched with no E (fielded if Renshaw/Bazley fails)? Done. Can confirm the E later tonight.

 

[Darkie]

So Short on field, one of Renshaw/Bazley as E, Sams benched with no E (fielded if Renshaw/Bazley fails)? Done. Can confirm the E later tonight.

View attachment 52003

Looks good to me - Short being on field seems to be the key for now.

I would normally have Bazley as the E given a (perceived?) higher ceiling, but with Renshaw in good form and bowling, I think there’s a decent case his ceiling is also high, and maybe more probably right now. I’d consider casing that one on the toss (whoever does their main discipline first). Neser still seems the best on field pick.

 

[Ironhawk]

Looks good to me - Short being on field seems to be the key for now.

I would normally have Bazley as the E given a (perceived?) higher ceiling, but with Renshaw in good form and bowling, I think there’s a decent case his ceiling is also high, and maybe more probably right now. I’d consider casing that one on the toss (whoever does their main discipline first). Neser still seems the best on field pick.

I think we should have kept Short as E myself...

 

[Darkie]

I think we should have kept Short as E myself...

Ugh! At least he should be bowling - they’ve only named four frontline options.

 

[Ironhawk]

2/532.

We will be all done by this time tomorrow.

 

[Ironhawk]

Renshaw or Bazley as BAT E? Need to decide by lunch time.

 

[Chumpion]

Renshaw or Bazley as BAT E? Need to decide by lunch time.

+1 Renshaw - he bats higher, is in decent form, and has been bowling overs (and getting wickets).

 

[mike89]

+1 Renshaw - he bats higher, is in decent form, and has been bowling overs (and getting wickets).

Assuming the other one is off field altogether, I'm happy with this.

 

[Ironhawk]

Assuming the other one is off field altogether, I'm happy with this.

Yes they will be, as shown in post 1463 above. If they post a below par score, we field Sams.

 

[Shaunpro1]

Id be tempted to go the more unique loop and look to zag and try make up some points, expect every man and their dog to loop Renshaw.

 

[Chumpion]

Id be tempted to go the more unique loop and look to zag and try make up some points, expect every man and their dog to loop Renshaw.

Bazley is owned by 90.3% (535 teams) of the top 1% and is on field 72%, so is on the bench for ~134 teams.

Renshaw is owned by 56.4% (334 teams) of the top 1% and is on field for 80%, so is on the bench for ~67 teams.

Given we have to choose between these 2, what is your thinking behind Renshaw being the more popular loop option? The numbers seem to suggest he is less popular and has less opportunity to be looped given the lower bench number.

 

[Shaunpro1]

View attachment 52028

Bazley is owned by 90.3% (535 teams) of the top 1% and is on field 72%, so is on the bench for ~134 teams.

Renshaw is owned by 56.4% (334 teams) of the top 1% and is on field for 80%, so is on the bench for ~67 teams.

Given we have to choose between these 2, what is your thinking behind Renshaw being the more popular loop option? The numbers seem to suggest he is less popular and has less opportunity to be looped given the lower bench number.

Would have thought far more coaches would have traded Bazley but appears not, at work so havent got the time to look deeply into it, my mistake.

 

[Herbie66]

Wasted (hindsight) one of my loops on Philippe , so need to field 3 of the 4 Heat DPP's myself (the other is traded).

Wonder if Labuschagne has a decent bat score in him today 🤔

 

[Shaunpro1]

Wasted (hindsight) one of my loops on Philippe , so need to field 3 of the 4 Heat DPP's myself (the other is traded).

Wonder if Labuschagne has a decent bat score in him today 🤔

Id just trade Labuschagne, think we all got stooged expecting him to bowl, as a batsman only think hes really a 20-30 guy.

Renshaw,Bazley and Neser only need one decent ball and theyll beat that.

 

[Ironhawk]

Renshaw locked in as E.

The only decisions left now will be whether we take his score, or bring on Sams post match. If David has a shocker, we might want to put the C on Sams too. Hopefully there's no decision to make and both Renshaw and David score well.

 

[Ironhawk]

Renshaw 22 as E. Think we field Sams instead. Thoughts?

David 87 as VC. Lock it in or Sams as C? Leaning to taking it.

 

[Herbie66]

Renshaw 22 as E. Think we field Sams instead. Thoughts?

David 87 as VC. Lock it in or Sams as C? Leaning to taking it.

Field Sams

Lock in David as VC

 

[Ironhawk]

891 + Sams (assuming we lock in David VC and don't take Renshaw).