Discussion BBL|12: Teams & In Game Discussion: Congrats Diabolical B2B Champion

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,963
Likes
126,636
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
I think I’ve just been run down in a keeper league by @Connoisseur, who was too good for my side. Maybe I shouldn’t have traded Sutherland to him last season!
Pleasure doing business with you. For our next deal would you entertain trading away J Richardson in exchange for someone like P Hatzoglou? :ROFLMAO:

Perfect timing for Naveed to return, to ensure I avoided a donut and narrowly got me over the line. Thoroughly enjoyed the involvement in the keeper league and very well run. The added bonus is being able to cheer on other players outside of our classic sides and more interest in matches in which we have little exposure in classic.
 

Darkie

Leadership Group
Joined
12 Apr 2014
Messages
25,411
Likes
65,501
AFL Club
Collingwood
Pleasure doing business with you. For our next deal would you entertain trading away J Richardson in exchange for someone like P Hatzoglou? :ROFLMAO:

Perfect timing for Naveed to return, to ensure I avoided a donut and narrowly got me over the line. Thoroughly enjoyed the involvement in the keeper league and very well run. The added bonus is being able to cheer on other players outside of our classic sides and more interest in matches in which we have little exposure in classic.
Hehe - my attack is a bit unbalanced: a lot of quicks, so maybe a spinner would add some balance? We may have some AFL trading opportunities first though 😉

Following the lesser-known, often younger, players is one of the best things about a keeper league. The satisfaction of picking a young prospect and them turning into, say, Will Sutherland is hard to beat!
 
Joined
13 Jan 2019
Messages
9,422
Likes
42,029
AFL Club
Sydney
8 entries so far (including myself). Will close entries at first ball. In alphabetical order so I come first at some point tonight.

7/11 - Qadir (2) and Khawaja (129) = 131
Beg2Differ - Pawson (0) and Peirson (1) = 1
Connoisseur - Sams (24) and Bazley (24) = 48
Diabolical - Sams (24) and Renshaw (49) = 73
Mike - Davies (0) and Renshaw (49) = 49
Miller is a Steele - Green (61) and Neser (6) = 67
Professor - McAndrew (24) and Hain (1) = 25
Shaunpro - Sangha (9) and Neser (6) = 15
Final standings
7/11 - Qadir (2) and Khawaja (129) = 131
Diabolical - Sams (24) and Renshaw (49) = 73
Miller is a Steele - Green (61) and Neser (6) = 67
Mike - Davies (0) and Renshaw (49) = 49
Connoisseur - Sams (24) and Bazley (24) = 48
Professor - McAndrew (24) and Hain (1) = 25
Shaunpro - Sangha (9) and Neser (6) = 15
Beg2Differ - Pawson (0) and Peirson (1) = 1

Well the rain ruined that game enough to make sure Khawaja was the most impactful.

Are we keen to have another crack tomorrow? Happy to wait until teams are out to start taking submissions. New people interested can also submit teams as today’s results don’t really count towards anything.
 
Joined
22 Oct 2014
Messages
7,882
Likes
41,731
AFL Club
North Melb.
Final standings
7/11 - Qadir (2) and Khawaja (129) = 131
Diabolical - Sams (24) and Renshaw (49) = 73
Miller is a Steele - Green (61) and Neser (6) = 67
Mike - Davies (0) and Renshaw (49) = 49
Connoisseur - Sams (24) and Bazley (24) = 48
Professor - McAndrew (24) and Hain (1) = 25
Shaunpro - Sangha (9) and Neser (6) = 15
Beg2Differ - Pawson (0) and Peirson (1) = 1

Well the rain ruined that game enough to make sure Khawaja was the most impactful.

Are we keen to have another crack tomorrow? Happy to wait until teams are out to start taking submissions. New people interested can also submit teams as today’s results don’t really count towards anything.
Can‘t see why not. A suggestion to add a few more variables which you can take or leave. Nominate a high scorer and a low scorer for each team and your score is the 2 nominated high scorers less the 2 nominated low scorers. Only suggesting this because I am pretty adept at the latter and not so much the former.
 
Joined
13 Jan 2019
Messages
9,422
Likes
42,029
AFL Club
Sydney
Can‘t see why not. A suggestion to add a few more variables which you can take or leave. Nominate a high scorer and a low scorer for each team and your score is the 2 nominated high scorers less the 2 nominated low scorers. Only suggesting this because I am pretty adept at the latter and not so much the former.
An alternative could be to just nominate 4 players (2 from each team) and then take the best score from each team? Sort of the same effect, but less working out on my end I guess.
 
Top