If Hibberd doesn't get up this week it'll be very interested how many sideways to Lloyd out of those at the top end.
Currently sitting 1,847 myself and tempted to roll the dice on going early on Max for Nank and throwing the VC on him. Nothing ventured nothing gained.
41% of the top 1000 have Scott Selwood. I can't imagine many will hang on to him and Zach Merrett appears to be the most talked about trade on this forum. He's already at 15%. Where do people think he will end up at?
I'm not in any cash leagues and although I would like to improve my overall ranking it would be nice to have a better chance at the weekly prize. Ebert and Cotchin look like the best POD's at a reasonable price. Port's draw makes Ebert tempting.
41% of the top 1000 have Scott Selwood. I can't imagine many will hang on to him and Zach Merrett appears to be the most talked about trade on this forum. He's already at 15%. Where do people think he will end up at?
I'm not in any cash leagues and although I would like to improve my overall ranking it would be nice to have a better chance at the weekly prize. Ebert and Cotchin look like the best POD's at a reasonable price. Port's draw makes Ebert tempting.
Jeez a lot of my players have very high ownership!
To jump up I need the following to fire:
D: Rance and Shaw
M: JPK, Fyfe and Selwood
R: Goldy and Gawn (though I expect his numbers change this week)
F: Buddy, Lynch
Those with Kreuzer at such an advantage at the moment. He is now overpriced and clearly the number 1 ruck. It's hard to justify trading Witts, Nank or Ryder to anyone else. I think the depleted Melbourne midfield will affect Gawn.
In my humble opinion Witts and Docherty were the biggest seperators in the first half of the year, Danger and Kreuzer have been the biggest seperators in the middle of the year and Kreuzer will be the biggest seperator in the run home as everyone in the top 100 has Danger.
There are 4 teams in the top 1000 with Tom McDonald.
I've put a minimum of 1% ownership on the lists otherwise they more than double in size. It's just a choice to make the information more readable so that the majority of the list aren't players that have very low ownership.
There are 4 teams in the top 1000 with Tom McDonald.
I've put a minimum of 1% ownership on the lists otherwise they more than double in size. It's just a choice to make the information more readable so that the majority of the list aren't players that have very low ownership.