Discussion Round 4: Teams & In Game Discussion

[IDIG]

Oliver and Lloyd with 230 DT for 194 SC is sick.

 

[Shaahorn]

Well done Hore (C)

Very happy with that considering my stuff up.

 

[Rumbler]

Dam it, not a good decision to put the VC on Lloyd tonight!!

 

[Professor]

1/112

 

[Courtesans]

Damn glad I kept Hore.

 

[quite ironic]

Lloyd continues to underwhelm whilst still scoring well, i don't get it.

Has always been the case for defenders who don’t have a heap of impact though. Effective forward kicks are still going to be worth the same which he gets a lot of.

34 touches and 122/108 is about right for 26 kicks, most metres gained on the ground, 6 score involvements and 7 rebound 50’s

 

[Nathan]

Scoring system isn’t based entirely on impact..he has a lot effective disposals every week.

 

[pizza safety]

Has always been the case for defenders who don’t have a heap of impact though.

34 touches and 122/108 is about right for 26 kicks, most metres gained on the ground, 6 score involvements and 7 rebound 50’s

Didn't lose any points for some turnovers at the end if we're being honest though hahaha

 

[IDIG]

Well done Hore (C)

Very happy with that considering my stuff up.

Oh what. I thought you were joking lol

Gotta be happy/relieved with that score.

 

[pizza safety]

Lloyd cost himself 120 with those 2 clanger kicks. Why couldn't he do that the last 3 weeks when I didn't have him?

Watched the scores after that because I'm naturally conspiracy minded when it comes to him, they did not go down after the kicks.

 

[quite ironic]

Didn't lose any points for some turnovers at the end if we're being honest though hahaha

I think it was more he took a mark and then a clanger so got a 6/0 ratio and then got a contested hard ball get booted it 50 metres forward for a clanger which was 3/0 which is right also.

9/0 is a bad result as an owner for those plays when it could’ve been 9/12 with 2 effective kicks.

 

[Rowsus]

Just about to say this. He’s had a very fumbly start to the qtr.

I think we need to bring the old rev up from last year. @Rowsus?

Didn't see this in time.
I seriously thought about trading Oliver this week.

 

[Kingkongbunndys]

I just got him in...no loyd and don’t know how he tonned up...Gawn deserved 130

 

[Beijing_Sting]

I guess I keep Heeney as vc. So long as Greene isn't a late in. So 3/460? Before scaling?

 

[pizza safety]

I think it was more he took a mark and then a clanger so got a 6/0 ratio and then got a contested hard ball get booted it 50 metres forward for a clanger which was 3/0 which is right also.

9/0 is a bad result as an owner for those plays when it could’ve been 9/12.

thought that a mark was just worth 2 and didn't realise it was a hardball get before he booted it 50 for the clanger, might be the case though. A bit too happy to whinge about him when he's not in my side even though I desperately want him. It just annoys me how he scores so well with such little impact.

 

[Ben's Beasts]

Just checked the SC scores for the first time since 3QT as I was purely watching the game in that last quarter for obvious reasons. Thought Gawn would be at least 140 SC but he’s just 113?? What the hell??

Anyway, don’t really care about SC right now. Finally a win for my boys!

 

[Pieman17]

Just checked the scores and Gawn has 113.

I thought I had picked a 140+ VC....

 

[AngryAnt]

Hore BE -74

 

[IDIG]

Don’t think I’ve seen many 20 contested possession games score 80 odd before. Hopefully that’s his bad scores behind him. 3 less than 100 now I think.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1116312843819917314

 

[Ben's Beasts]

Nah, sorry, but how the hell does a team win a game by 22 points and dominate the game when it was there to be won yet score 1586 SC to 1712 SC.

That’s actually ridiculous.