Discussion BBL|09 SuperCoach BBL In Game Discussion

Woosie

Woosie

#14,004
Joined
29 Nov 2019
Messages
5,671
Likes
20,334
AFL Club
Brisbane
#14,004
Beej12 said:
I just love how Siddle is guaranteed to bowl at least 1 if not 2 overs at the death
Click to expand...
Yes, tough choice those. I chose Boyce over Finch myself, if Finch bowls 1-2 overs, wow, but why should he with 4 other spinners in the team. So Finch would have to score big.

... Last time I said that the player had to score 165 for a price rise, they scored 164! Now who was that again ?
 
Presto

Presto

#14,005
Joined
1 Feb 2014
Messages
2,023
Likes
7,147
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#14,005
Woosie said:
Agree. I don't like this either.

Ive thought 3-4 rounds should be a minimum entrance to win except the first 1-2 rounds. But then I realised people would just start their teams 3-4 earlier banking solely on top prize for the round they want to win. It's probably easier to do this closer to the end of the season too when the majority of people give up. Poor form I say. But unless rules are changed then it'll continue to happen. Don't ask me about what/how those rules could be changed though, there seems to be always loop holes that people flaunt.
Click to expand...
+1 I agree 100%
 
S

squid

#14,013
Joined
21 Dec 2019
Messages
156
Likes
663
AFL Club
Essendon
#14,013
Darkie said:
I think you could close this one by requiring the player to play the whole season to be eligible (start at round 1 and maybe only have one round where they don't change their side at all). I agree that people always look for loopholes though.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't change much, you could still make as many teams as you wanted prior to R1. The people that are better at doing it start from round 1 anyway as it allows cash generation to get a better team. They just have each team set up specifically targeting the weekly prize of a certain round, for example the person who wins this round could of not played and have been targeting this round but you wouldn't know as the total points would still be acceptable.

Such as 17th place for this round just gone has played all 12 rounds, scored 5203 pts, and is ranked 60,207 overall. Somehow Miraculously had 11 DGW players scoring 1350, like 1/3 of his total season points, I imagine whoever has that account would have another one set up for this DGW round too.
 
Darkie

Darkie

Leadership Group
#14,019
Joined
12 Apr 2014
Messages
26,039
Likes
67,447
AFL Club
Collingwood
#14,019
squid said:
Wouldn't change much, you could still make as many teams as you wanted prior to R1. The people that are better at doing it start from round 1 anyway as it allows cash generation to get a better team. They just have each team set up specifically targeting the weekly prize of a certain round, for example the person who wins this round could of not played and have been targeting this round but you wouldn't know as the total points would still be acceptable.

Such as 17th place for this round just gone has played all 12 rounds, scored 5203 pts, and is ranked 60,207 overall. Somehow Miraculously had 11 DGW players scoring 1350, like 1/3 of his total season points, I imagine whoever has that account would have another one set up for this DGW round too.
Click to expand...
I thought there was a rule that prevented anyone with multiple teams from receiving a prize.

Personally it feels like starting and managing c. 14 teams (one per round) is a lot of effort for an improved, but by no means certain, chance of winning a weekly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top