Discussion BBL|09 SuperCoach BBL In Game Discussion

[toxic]

Well let me put it this way, it cost me 109 points...

Ferg....

 

[Beg2Differ]

I’ll start the bidding; 732 with Stoinis (C).

Only high score I missed was Larkin and assume I won’t be alone there.

783...

Edit: Make that first underbidder.

 

[Connoisseur]

N Maddinson= 33
VS
G Maxwell+ A Hales+ D Sams= 30

 

[Grundogging]

All out for 698 - Morris (C).

Missed on NCN (Jono Cook was a great choice in hindsight) but can't argue with switching him out for Larkin.

The other decent scorer in Ross was a real POD so congrats to anyone who brought him in.

 

[OnTopBar]

475 This is golf yeah?

 

[Sideshow Bob]

614 Morris c
did realistically consider Larkin but to be honest it would have been for ncn so it’s limited

 

[toxic]

737

Solid enough

 

[Professor]

717 Morris

 

[IDIG]

591 with Sams C

 

[ScoringFreely]

671 mainly due to C Haris. Missed Larkin, Ross and Nair.

Hopefully weather changes for the final

 

[OnTopBar]

Ferg....

I'm interested to hear how you went Tox....I know you had the C on the Hulk and Larkin

 

[mike89]

Ferg....

Maxwell! Have just seen Rauf's score updated to add another three.

667 regardless - hit most of the big fish (minus Ross) but hoo boy does that sting...

 

[Ben's Beasts]

641 (Rauf)

6/11 of the top scorers.

 

[50 shades of Wade]

787

 

[Danseels1985]

649,could have been a whole lot worse if I captained Zampa like I was going to initially

 

[Ben's Beasts]

981 will be the perfect number for this round and there will not be a single team that scores it.

 

[Pookus McFly]

695, feels about par
Not moving out Ross was probably my ticket to a ranking slide
Still, gotta be happy with that for a side that had 5 players combine for 44 points

 

[The Myth]

833 C Stoinis. Only 50+ score I missed was Ross.

Swapped Khawaja for Larkin 2 minutes before the deadline. Stoked to see that come off.

 

[Ironhawk]

543. Missed lock out, was planning on making changes after work and got caught up elsewhere. Probably would have made my team worse anyway.

 

[Herbie66]

I went with Larkin based on concerns with the weather shortening the Thunder's innings (which looks unfounded) and Larkin's last start against them - he's also gotten a start the last couple of games, so I felt he was worth the punt over another bowler (which would have been NCN).

kicking myself I didn't select Larkin

0 , 95 , 0 , 19 , 41 , 10 , 43 , 3 , 10 , 35 , 34 , 5 certainly screams out pick me ?

was probably expecting a normal 140-150 MCG pitch that assisted the spinners , so definitely misread that as well

need to learn to analyse players a lot better