Discussion Round 1: Teams & In Game Discussion

Darkie

Leadership Group
Joined
12 Apr 2014
Messages
25,410
Likes
65,497
AFL Club
Collingwood
People don’t seem to be getting their heads around how the scoring is impacted.

What’s changing is the variance of scores. Low scores get worse, and high scores get inflated. Because the implication is that what the players are doing in the shortened game, will be extrapolated identically as if they are playing a full quarter. This is the only way for the 3300 to be catered for, which is why we are seeing extreme scores.

You can look at at Heeney having 8 touches, and say that’s not worth 89 points under the old scoring (ie Full length quarters). Because it’s not. The 89 is a (full game) inference based on what he’s done in the limited time.
I agree. There's no new scoring - the existing system just gets extrapolated (which is what leads to more high scores, and more low scores).

Whether there is a sustained change in game style to account for the shorter games is a different question, but it's still very early.
 
Top