Competitions 2020 SCS AFL SuperCoach Quartets Competition
- Thread starter Connoisseur
- Start date
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 36,714
- Likes
- 118,878
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
RD5:
Highest scoring quartet: Team 17: @Goodie's Guns , @nicohigh , @Tranterpants and @pizza safety =8222
Lowest scoring quartet: Team 14: @Bomber18 , @Ntay4 , @Monya Meow Meow and @Dimmawit =7552
Highest winning margin: Team 16: @PC , @Hawk41 , @Beg2Differ and @BIGB0Y defeated Team 20 by 522 points.
Lowest winning margin: Team 19: @Connoisseur , @minidee , @toxic and @Bermi defeated Team 18 by 69 points.
Highest scoring quartet: Team 17: @Goodie's Guns , @nicohigh , @Tranterpants and @pizza safety =8222
Lowest scoring quartet: Team 14: @Bomber18 , @Ntay4 , @Monya Meow Meow and @Dimmawit =7552
Highest winning margin: Team 16: @PC , @Hawk41 , @Beg2Differ and @BIGB0Y defeated Team 20 by 522 points.
Lowest winning margin: Team 19: @Connoisseur , @minidee , @toxic and @Bermi defeated Team 18 by 69 points.
Thanks again @Connoisseur! Appreciate the stat gathering as this is probably the only format (besides league overall ranking) where there is some solid form of camaraderie between teams/quartets!
Got through this round unscathed @jiimmyy @stephen @Philzsay - need to hope for a better round to keep the unbeaten start to the season alive! #team15
Got through this round unscathed @jiimmyy @stephen @Philzsay - need to hope for a better round to keep the unbeaten start to the season alive! #team15
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 36,714
- Likes
- 118,878
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Highest total points per quartet=
1st: Team 3: @Professor , @Stephen247 , @Rumbler and @lappinitup = 42342 (Ladder Position= 10th)
2nd: Team 5: @Ben's Beasts , @Juzzo , @Beijing_Sting and @All is Wells = 42279 (Ladder Position= 2nd)
3rd: Team 17: @Goodie's Guns , @nicohigh , @Tranterpants and @pizza safety = 42096 (Ladder Position= 3rd)
4th: Team 13: @doc ron , @Seymour Skinner , @Blaze and @Foxy's Fe-Lions = 42070 (Ladder Position= 4th)
5th: Team 15: @Philzsay , @stephen , @jiimmyy and @kennychao = 41904 (Ladder Position= 1st)
6th: Team 20: @Impromptu , @Creeker , @TopBillings and @7/11 = 41710 (Ladder Position= 5th)
7th: Team 16: @PC , @Hawk41 , @Beg2Differ and @BIGB0Y = 41473 (Ladder Position= 6th)
8th: Team 10: @Tex , @Ironhawk , @Slammer and @hunterpunter = 41342 (Ladder Position= 11th)
9th: Team 14: @Bomber18 , @Ntay4 , @Monya Meow Meow and @Dimmawit = 41316 (Ladder Position= 7th)
10th: Team 6: @Diabolical , @Eagling , @Snowman and @Damion23 =41305 (Ladder Position= 12th)
11th: Team 9: @KLo30 , @Santoz , @teatai and @BigRuss = 41260 (Ladder Position= 13th)
12th: Team 18: @jaca , @Lost In The Sky , @Drew and @The Experiment = 41212 (Ladder Position= 14th)
13th: Team 19: @Connoisseur , @minidee , @toxic and @Bermi = 41199 (Ladder Position= 15th)
14th: Team 1: @THCLT , @Zimmer , @50 shades of Wade and @Ricky Bobby = 41197 (Ladder Position= 16th)
15th: Team 12: @Herbie66 , @FirstTimer , @Leroy and @Deeman1 = 41152 (Ladder Position= 8th)
16th: Team 2: @Tamuhawk , @kadog , @kakarot and @Crabby Skills = 41068 (Ladder Position= 17th)
17th: Team 8: @Tails , @lipsunited , @Spots and @Presto = 40995 (Ladder Position= 9th)
18th: Team 11: @IDIG , @Hot Shame , @BomberSam and @Grundogging = 40689 (Ladder Position= 18th)
19th: Team 4: @Darkie , @SxMphxS , @randomcliche and @quite ironic = 40374 (Ladder Position= 20th)
20th: Team 7: @Rowsus , @NT.Thunder , @bomberboy and @Stormzy = 40290 (Ladder Position= 19th)
1st: Team 3: @Professor , @Stephen247 , @Rumbler and @lappinitup = 42342 (Ladder Position= 10th)
2nd: Team 5: @Ben's Beasts , @Juzzo , @Beijing_Sting and @All is Wells = 42279 (Ladder Position= 2nd)
3rd: Team 17: @Goodie's Guns , @nicohigh , @Tranterpants and @pizza safety = 42096 (Ladder Position= 3rd)
4th: Team 13: @doc ron , @Seymour Skinner , @Blaze and @Foxy's Fe-Lions = 42070 (Ladder Position= 4th)
5th: Team 15: @Philzsay , @stephen , @jiimmyy and @kennychao = 41904 (Ladder Position= 1st)
6th: Team 20: @Impromptu , @Creeker , @TopBillings and @7/11 = 41710 (Ladder Position= 5th)
7th: Team 16: @PC , @Hawk41 , @Beg2Differ and @BIGB0Y = 41473 (Ladder Position= 6th)
8th: Team 10: @Tex , @Ironhawk , @Slammer and @hunterpunter = 41342 (Ladder Position= 11th)
9th: Team 14: @Bomber18 , @Ntay4 , @Monya Meow Meow and @Dimmawit = 41316 (Ladder Position= 7th)
10th: Team 6: @Diabolical , @Eagling , @Snowman and @Damion23 =41305 (Ladder Position= 12th)
11th: Team 9: @KLo30 , @Santoz , @teatai and @BigRuss = 41260 (Ladder Position= 13th)
12th: Team 18: @jaca , @Lost In The Sky , @Drew and @The Experiment = 41212 (Ladder Position= 14th)
13th: Team 19: @Connoisseur , @minidee , @toxic and @Bermi = 41199 (Ladder Position= 15th)
14th: Team 1: @THCLT , @Zimmer , @50 shades of Wade and @Ricky Bobby = 41197 (Ladder Position= 16th)
15th: Team 12: @Herbie66 , @FirstTimer , @Leroy and @Deeman1 = 41152 (Ladder Position= 8th)
16th: Team 2: @Tamuhawk , @kadog , @kakarot and @Crabby Skills = 41068 (Ladder Position= 17th)
17th: Team 8: @Tails , @lipsunited , @Spots and @Presto = 40995 (Ladder Position= 9th)
18th: Team 11: @IDIG , @Hot Shame , @BomberSam and @Grundogging = 40689 (Ladder Position= 18th)
19th: Team 4: @Darkie , @SxMphxS , @randomcliche and @quite ironic = 40374 (Ladder Position= 20th)
20th: Team 7: @Rowsus , @NT.Thunder , @bomberboy and @Stormzy = 40290 (Ladder Position= 19th)
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 36,714
- Likes
- 118,878
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
RD6 Fixture:
18th- Team 11 VS 14th- Team 18
Team 11: @IDIG , @Hot Shame , @BomberSam and @Grundogging
Team 18: @jaca , @Drew , @Lost In The Sky and @The Experiment
5th- Team 20 VS 15th- Team 19
Team 20: @Impromptu , @Creeker , @TopBillings and @7/11
Team 19: @Connoisseur , @minidee , @toxic and @Bermi
11th- Team 10 VS 17th- Team 2
Team 10: @Tex , @Ironhawk , @Slammer and @hunterpunter
Team 2: @Tamuhawk , @kadog , @kakarot and @Crabby Skills
7th- Team 14 VS 6th- Team 16
Team 14: @Bomber18 , @Ntay4 , @Monya Meow Meow and @Dimmawit
Team 16: @PC , @Hawk41 , @Beg2Differ and @BIGB0Y
2nd- Team 5 VS 1st- Team 15
Team 5: @Ben's Beasts , @Juzzo , @Beijing_Sting and @All is Wells
Team 15: @Philzsay , @stephen , @jiimmyy and @kennychao
3rd- Team 17 VS 8th- Team 12
Team 17: @Goodie's Guns , @nicohigh , @Tranterpants and @pizza safety
Team 12: @Herbie66 , @FirstTimer , @Leroy and @Deeman1
19th- Team 7 VS 16th- Team 1
Team 7: @Rowsus , @NT.Thunder , @bomberboy and @Stormzy
Team 1: @THCLT , @Zimmer , @50 shades of Wade and @Ricky Bobby
20th- Team 4 VS 10th- Team 3
Team 4: @Darkie , @SxMphxS , @randomcliche , @quite ironic
Team 3: @Professor , @Stephen247 , @Rumbler and @lappinitup
9th- Team 8 VS 4th- Team 13
Team 8: @Tails , @lipsunited , @Spots and @Presto
Team 13: @doc ron , @Seymour Skinner , @Blaze and @Foxy's Fe-Lions
13th- Team 9 VS 12th- Team 6
Team 9: @KLo30 , @Santoz , @teatai and @BigRuss
Team 6: @Diabolical , @Eagling , @Snowman and @Damion23
18th- Team 11 VS 14th- Team 18
Team 11: @IDIG , @Hot Shame , @BomberSam and @Grundogging
Team 18: @jaca , @Drew , @Lost In The Sky and @The Experiment
5th- Team 20 VS 15th- Team 19
Team 20: @Impromptu , @Creeker , @TopBillings and @7/11
Team 19: @Connoisseur , @minidee , @toxic and @Bermi
11th- Team 10 VS 17th- Team 2
Team 10: @Tex , @Ironhawk , @Slammer and @hunterpunter
Team 2: @Tamuhawk , @kadog , @kakarot and @Crabby Skills
7th- Team 14 VS 6th- Team 16
Team 14: @Bomber18 , @Ntay4 , @Monya Meow Meow and @Dimmawit
Team 16: @PC , @Hawk41 , @Beg2Differ and @BIGB0Y
2nd- Team 5 VS 1st- Team 15
Team 5: @Ben's Beasts , @Juzzo , @Beijing_Sting and @All is Wells
Team 15: @Philzsay , @stephen , @jiimmyy and @kennychao
3rd- Team 17 VS 8th- Team 12
Team 17: @Goodie's Guns , @nicohigh , @Tranterpants and @pizza safety
Team 12: @Herbie66 , @FirstTimer , @Leroy and @Deeman1
19th- Team 7 VS 16th- Team 1
Team 7: @Rowsus , @NT.Thunder , @bomberboy and @Stormzy
Team 1: @THCLT , @Zimmer , @50 shades of Wade and @Ricky Bobby
20th- Team 4 VS 10th- Team 3
Team 4: @Darkie , @SxMphxS , @randomcliche , @quite ironic
Team 3: @Professor , @Stephen247 , @Rumbler and @lappinitup
9th- Team 8 VS 4th- Team 13
Team 8: @Tails , @lipsunited , @Spots and @Presto
Team 13: @doc ron , @Seymour Skinner , @Blaze and @Foxy's Fe-Lions
13th- Team 9 VS 12th- Team 6
Team 9: @KLo30 , @Santoz , @teatai and @BigRuss
Team 6: @Diabolical , @Eagling , @Snowman and @Damion23
@Connoisseur, any chance we can switch to the first poll option for scoring in this competition (best 3 scores in a team only count each round)? Guessing it is probably too late to change now. My team would have won quite easily this round with that scoring system in place, instead we lost due to needing to include my score. I understand this is not going to happen every week, I know it is the first time across 5 rounds a result would have changed for my team for example, but one thing is happening every week - I am the lowest scorer on my team, and quite significantly so this week. Once again, I apologise to my team for this.
I don't mind that I wouldn't have had a single score count in this competition yet if we do implement this change. I am almost sure that I am the only person in the whole comp with the 5 lowest weekly scores for their team, so it is likely just me who would have no score contribution at all to this point.
Believe it or not, I am trying to turn things around, but I imagine it's got to be a bit frustrating for the rest of a team to have the same person dragging them down every single week, and I think this form of scoring (top 3 scores) would give a more even competition for all teams, not just for my team. Everyone has down weeks, and this helps o***et that.
This is not intended for personal gain, even if my team would have an extra win with this scoring method. I wasn't sure what the best scoring method would be prior to the season starting and thought I would wait a few weeks to see how things played out. Personally, I now much prefer using this top 3 team scores method, as it seems a lot fairer, but if it is too much hassle to change, I understand. I would be happy to help you out with any changes to scoring, data collation etc if you do decide to change things now, but I am guessing it won't happen.
Thanks for considering. If you decide not to change things, keep up the good work anyway. I am enjoying this concept, but I would be enjoying this a lot more if my scoring wasn't negatively affecting my team every single week.
I don't mind that I wouldn't have had a single score count in this competition yet if we do implement this change. I am almost sure that I am the only person in the whole comp with the 5 lowest weekly scores for their team, so it is likely just me who would have no score contribution at all to this point.
Believe it or not, I am trying to turn things around, but I imagine it's got to be a bit frustrating for the rest of a team to have the same person dragging them down every single week, and I think this form of scoring (top 3 scores) would give a more even competition for all teams, not just for my team. Everyone has down weeks, and this helps o***et that.
This is not intended for personal gain, even if my team would have an extra win with this scoring method. I wasn't sure what the best scoring method would be prior to the season starting and thought I would wait a few weeks to see how things played out. Personally, I now much prefer using this top 3 team scores method, as it seems a lot fairer, but if it is too much hassle to change, I understand. I would be happy to help you out with any changes to scoring, data collation etc if you do decide to change things now, but I am guessing it won't happen.
Thanks for considering. If you decide not to change things, keep up the good work anyway. I am enjoying this concept, but I would be enjoying this a lot more if my scoring wasn't negatively affecting my team every single week.
@Connoisseur, any chance we can switch to the first poll option for scoring in this competition (best 3 scores in a team only count each round)? Guessing it is probably too late to change now. My team would have won quite easily this round with that scoring system in place, instead we lost due to needing to include my score. I understand this is not going to happen every week, I know it is the first time across 5 rounds a result would have changed for my team for example, but one thing is happening every week - I am the lowest scorer on my team, and quite significantly so this week. Once again, I apologise to my team for this.
I don't mind that I wouldn't have had a single score count in this competition yet if we do implement this change. I am almost sure that I am the only person in the whole comp with the 5 lowest weekly scores for their team, so it is likely just me who would have no score contribution at all to this point.
Believe it or not, I am trying to turn things around, but I imagine it's got to be a bit frustrating for the rest of a team to have the same person dragging them down every single week, and I think this form of scoring (top 3 scores) would give a more even competition for all teams, not just for my team. Everyone has down weeks, and this helps o***et that.
This is not intended for personal gain, even if my team would have an extra win with this scoring method. I wasn't sure what the best scoring method would be prior to the season starting and thought I would wait a few weeks to see how things played out. Personally, I now much prefer using this top 3 team scores method, as it seems a lot fairer, but if it is too much hassle to change, I understand. I would be happy to help you out with any changes to scoring, data collation etc if you do decide to change things now, but I am guessing it won't happen.
Thanks for considering. If you decide not to change things, keep up the good work anyway. I am enjoying this concept, but I would be enjoying this a lot more if my scoring wasn't negatively affecting my team every single week.
I don't mind that I wouldn't have had a single score count in this competition yet if we do implement this change. I am almost sure that I am the only person in the whole comp with the 5 lowest weekly scores for their team, so it is likely just me who would have no score contribution at all to this point.
Believe it or not, I am trying to turn things around, but I imagine it's got to be a bit frustrating for the rest of a team to have the same person dragging them down every single week, and I think this form of scoring (top 3 scores) would give a more even competition for all teams, not just for my team. Everyone has down weeks, and this helps o***et that.
This is not intended for personal gain, even if my team would have an extra win with this scoring method. I wasn't sure what the best scoring method would be prior to the season starting and thought I would wait a few weeks to see how things played out. Personally, I now much prefer using this top 3 team scores method, as it seems a lot fairer, but if it is too much hassle to change, I understand. I would be happy to help you out with any changes to scoring, data collation etc if you do decide to change things now, but I am guessing it won't happen.
Thanks for considering. If you decide not to change things, keep up the good work anyway. I am enjoying this concept, but I would be enjoying this a lot more if my scoring wasn't negatively affecting my team every single week.
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 36,714
- Likes
- 118,878
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Update:
Team 5: @Ben's Beasts = 1588 + @Juzzo = 1390 + @Beijing_Sting = 1737 + @All is Wells = 1419
= 6134
VS
Team 15: @Philzsay = 1561 + @stephen = 1170 + @jiimmyy = 1638 + @kennychao = 1437
=5806
Played:
Team 5: 6+8+5+8= 27
Team 15: 7+9+4+7=27
Left to play:
Team 5: J Lloyd- 2, D Martin- 3, M Bontempelli- 2, M Pittonet- 4, J Aarts- 3, M Pickett- 3, S Docherty- 4, P Cripps- 4, T Lynch and B Williams
Team 15: M Bontempelli- 2 (1 as C), M Pittonet- 4, S Docherty- 4, P Cripps- 4, D Martin- 2, T Lynch, M Pickett, C Daniel, J Macrae- 3, T Williamson- 2, J Aarts- 2 and J Lloyd
Team 5 PODS: B Williams, 1 extra J Lloyd, 1 extra D Martin, 2 extra M Pickett
Team 15 PODS: C Daniel, 3 of J Macrae, Captain Bont (?), 2 of T Williamson
Team 5 currently ahead by 328 points with 2 matches left.
Team 5: @Ben's Beasts = 1588 + @Juzzo = 1390 + @Beijing_Sting = 1737 + @All is Wells = 1419
= 6134
VS
Team 15: @Philzsay = 1561 + @stephen = 1170 + @jiimmyy = 1638 + @kennychao = 1437
=5806
Played:
Team 5: 6+8+5+8= 27
Team 15: 7+9+4+7=27
Left to play:
Team 5: J Lloyd- 2, D Martin- 3, M Bontempelli- 2, M Pittonet- 4, J Aarts- 3, M Pickett- 3, S Docherty- 4, P Cripps- 4, T Lynch and B Williams
Team 15: M Bontempelli- 2 (1 as C), M Pittonet- 4, S Docherty- 4, P Cripps- 4, D Martin- 2, T Lynch, M Pickett, C Daniel, J Macrae- 3, T Williamson- 2, J Aarts- 2 and J Lloyd
Team 5 PODS: B Williams, 1 extra J Lloyd, 1 extra D Martin, 2 extra M Pickett
Team 15 PODS: C Daniel, 3 of J Macrae, Captain Bont (?), 2 of T Williamson
Team 5 currently ahead by 328 points with 2 matches left.
