Forwards Discussion
- Thread starter Impromptu
- Start date
- Joined
- 13 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 757
- Likes
- 45
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
I think if other forward rookies like Garlett, Honeychurch, Broomhead and Nankervis if R/F will start ahead of him for me. Melbourne talls just aren't convincing and if Dawes/Clark go down, Hogan could get one of the better defenders. I haven't thought about my structure too much and I am still very open about who to include, and i may include Hogan too
- Joined
- 13 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 757
- Likes
- 45
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Definitely. Another thing with Hogan is that the Demons have Spencer, Gawn and Fitzpatrick all vying for the number 1 ruck spot, i'm unsure who's leading the race there, but occasionally one of the may play forward, meaning Hogan will get less of it or less games. But yeah, if he can play the first 10 or so games and have a reasonable outfit, seems a good selection, depending on pricing.
Spot on Nk29, it means a higher MN or they have shifted systems to "opinion pricing" or "multi years average pricing". Either way, that combined with higher priced Rookies spells a HUGE change to SC. Unless the salary cap is increased, we all have to rethink our strategies!
It's kind of unbelievable, after near the end of last season Ablett was leaked as a confirmed $630k for 2014, which meant a 10% lowering of the MN.
I think we're in for a frantic and confusing few hours, when SC finally opens.
It's kind of unbelievable, after near the end of last season Ablett was leaked as a confirmed $630k for 2014, which meant a 10% lowering of the MN.
I think we're in for a frantic and confusing few hours, when SC finally opens.
Mitchell v Parker v Chappy? All around the same price and all M/F.
Mitchell (20 years old)
2013 - 12 games @ 86 ave
Parker (21 years old)
2013 - 22 games @ 87 ave
2012 - 16 games @ 70 ave
2011 - 11 games @ 52 ave
Chapman (32 years old)
2013 - 6 games @ 96 ave
2012 - 20 games @ 100 ave
2011 - 20 games @ 101 ave
Chappy has been given a 10% discount but less upside of the other 2. In order, which would everyone choose?
Mitchell (20 years old)
2013 - 12 games @ 86 ave
Parker (21 years old)
2013 - 22 games @ 87 ave
2012 - 16 games @ 70 ave
2011 - 11 games @ 52 ave
Chapman (32 years old)
2013 - 6 games @ 96 ave
2012 - 20 games @ 100 ave
2011 - 20 games @ 101 ave
Chappy has been given a 10% discount but less upside of the other 2. In order, which would everyone choose?
if we had 44 trades - chappy! but as we don't it is a no for me. of the other 2....
safe - parker for natural progression, will be a solid scorer and best 22 - those stats you posted look pretty good
x factor - mitchell has the game to break out like danger or beams but will it be this year? or will he flatten out for a year, head back to the 2's and/or get injured. risk/reward option
for me it depends on the type of player you are looking for to compliment your fwd line when choosing between them
safe - parker for natural progression, will be a solid scorer and best 22 - those stats you posted look pretty good
x factor - mitchell has the game to break out like danger or beams but will it be this year? or will he flatten out for a year, head back to the 2's and/or get injured. risk/reward option
for me it depends on the type of player you are looking for to compliment your fwd line when choosing between them