Translation: He wasn't ready the first time they brought him in, but he's regained his stride at VFL level so they'll consider him if another opportunity presents itself - eg. via injury or if one of the other young kids looks like they need a rest (and we have a lot of them now).
Don't expect a rookie revolving door ala Geelong or GWS.
Hey all I'm having a crazy dream where I'm mulling over silly trades to make this week and I think I found a mistake in the SC website because there is a green tick next to this guy named Highmore or someone?! I mean it's probably a glitch as all websites experience some from time to time right....????!!
p.s. @Goodie's Guns YOU called it! What a champ! 🏆 Love the intel you provide! 👏
So what’s the JS if the Saints rookie Byrnes like? I need a cheap downgrade to cash out Warner and it would be handy to be able to move Scott forward too.
Wanted Highmore back in a couple of weeks! Becomes a massive negative POD now as a cash cow and I'm not going to trade him in, surely? Still blows my mind he stayed in 94% or whatever it was of teams!
I think Mansell's place is dependent on how Baker goes as Lambert's replacement because he's essentially covering Baker. Didn't look good when Baker was moved back to defence in the 2nd half last week but from a structure perspective Baker has looked good playing that high half forward role.
Hard to disagree, Bakes might of been sent back to try attempt stem the bleeding. Have also liked him up the ground, other smalls just not working at the moment. Aarts has been on my ****list most of the season, but he actually had a dip for the first half last week.
I've like what Mansell has offered in regards to actual footy, his SC output, not so much.