Discussion 2023: Round 1 Teams & In Game Discussion - See page 1 for Teams and Final Subs

Rowsus

Statistician
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
29,130
Likes
64,893
AFL Club
Melbourne
What's par looking like?
Tough round in terms of injuries and underperforming pressure.
Hard to gauge but if you Dodged everything 2200 plus wouldn't be out of the equation.
Agree, there will be some 2,200+ scores, but the number of things that need dodging, means par (say weekly 8,000th?) might be 2150? Really depends on the popular players in these last 2 games.
Davies, Mackenzie, Marshall, Greene F all over 50% ownership + Fyfe and Phillipou over 40% will all have a bearing on par.
 
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
2,295
Likes
6,291
Suppose it depends how happy you are with the rest of your team. Or perhaps how prepared you are to bet that he won't be top 8 at all. End of the day, that game is gone, and if I think he'll still be top 8 I don't really want to be missing out on his points in the meantime.
Well I've had one obvious miss in Cogs who looks fit and ready to fire as a full time member of a trimmed down midfield group at GWS, so with a bit of cash ITB already I could potentially shuffle the tiles a little to get Cogs in and then look back to Laird when upgrade season begins.

I'll be keen to see if he has had any issues with illness during the week, because he looked so far off the pace from early on in the game even when Adelaide were well on top that it rang the alarm bells almost straight away. He just didn't look right at any point in the game today and the normal defensive intensity we see from him when he isn't getting his hands on the ball was also completely absent, which is where the insurance policy with his fantasy scoring really comes from.
 
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
290
Likes
1,362
AFL Club
St Kilda
What's par looking like?
Tough round in terms of injuries and underperforming pressure.
Hard to gauge but if you Dodged everything 2200 plus wouldn't be out of the equation.
There will still be some big scores for those that avoided the injuries and sub-par premos. Many popular picks scored well.
I guess in terms of average though you’re probably about right, my team will certainly help bring the average down :p
 
Joined
28 Dec 2013
Messages
781
Likes
3,100
AFL Club
West Coast
Will see how he scores next week.
If this was just 1 poor game, then this score will quickly rotate out.
Not sure that's an option this year, in a year where the sub has been introduced back upgrading to the top prems 'should' be more difficult, every $$$ counts. How can an elite mid score sub 50, i didn't watch the game but was Green that much better today? Talk about carnage, Stewart, Jones, Lard(C) and Bruhn would be in a fair few sides, everyone with Laird (C) myself included is behind the 8 ball. Every non owner is licking their lips, to claw back some rank need to go against the grain, time for something creative me thinks..... As soon as it opens he is gone, cannot wait to Turf him
 
Last edited:
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
2,295
Likes
6,291
Flick him to Green, and get $160k+. It's very tempting!
Already have Green, Gulden, DeGoey and Callaghan, so overall it's been not a bad week with the speculative picks and it's just fallen over with Jones, the Flanders/Sheezel split at F6 (although that was in lucky dip territory really) and now Laird.
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,958
Likes
126,610
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
What's par looking like?
Tough round in terms of injuries and underperforming pressure.
Hard to gauge but if you Dodged everything 2200 plus wouldn't be out of the equation.
Depends what rankings position we are referring to or whether it is overall between every single competitor given the term "par" is used very loosely and usually a lack of methodology to back up predictions thus not beneficial.

Seems a pointless exercise to be concerned with as all will be revealed later tonight and still plenty of twists and turns in store to vary a "par" score.
 
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
2,295
Likes
6,291
Will see how he scores next week.
If this was just 1 poor game, then this score will quickly rotate out.
Yes it will rotate out quickly, but off the top of my head I'm guessing he's still probably looking at a 200-ish BE next week against Richmond, maybe 170 BE the following week against Port and back down to a normal BE for him against Freo the following week (that is assuming he tons up against both), so he's probably looking at losing a solid chunk of cash over rounds 3-4.

I wouldn't be making a move on Laird until we see him go around again next week, but the strategy around any trades this week will probably be centred around the potential "what-if" for the following week.
 
Joined
9 Mar 2012
Messages
10,810
Likes
16,193
AFL Club
Adelaide
Yeah, I got an itchie trade finger yesterday and this morning. Wondering if I should turn him into Caminiti, to fund corrections in the next 2 Rounds. Glad I held him. Good ratio, but I thought he could have been given a few more points than he was. When he crashed that pack, drew the free but kept playing and gave the ball off, he seemed to gain not as much as he might have.
13 possessions for 8 score involvements is gold.
Yeah he’s a third year player and looks like he’s primed to have a breakout year, exactly what we love in SC.
 
Joined
18 Jul 2016
Messages
3,769
Likes
26,253
AFL Club
Sydney
Giants vs Crows

General - One of the very worst games of football I've ever watched. The first half had less intensity than an Auskick game, the second half looked like a bad preseason game. Honestly, there was some bad football this weekend but this game was on a different tier. Somehow it was possibly even worst from a fantasy perspective. Honestly, watch the 5 highlights and save yourself the misery of this game.

Giants - They got 4 points. That's about all they can take out of this. Their first half was as bad as you could play, their 2nd half was about 5% better, the old saying of dragging someone down to your level and then beating them with experience. Honestly, if you're the coach you just say we're throwing this one out and starting again.

Green - Amazing ratio for him and can't fault his workrate or effort, he kept bobbing up all over the ground. It felt like all his touches went to opponents early but he had the CD scorer on his side obviously! Seriously, was really solid and looks a must have after backing up the preseason in the real stuff.

Greene - Was phenomenal, sometimes I just don't understand how SC works, honestly, it's like they mixed up the two T. Green(e) when scoring, he was the best on the ground and should have had a huge ratio, he dominated and was the only reason they were in this game and then the primary reason why they won. Role was **** though.

Coniglio - Role was great, he was the other player who really kept them in it and dragged them home, I'd have said his ratio was spot on and Greene should have had similar. He managed to match Gulden for a week as that was the head to head for most.

Ward - Ended up in a pure midfield role thanks to the Perryman injury.

Kelly - Concussed by a nasty (clumsy not intentional) headbutt from ROB early in Q4, it's a shame because he was lifting and starting to scrape back his ratio. His game felt almost identical to Green and his ratio is what I'd have expected, it's actually funny that basically the same statline and eye test can produce such varying results in SC! Will miss a week and becomes a complete disaster as a result with midfield depth looking awful.

Callaghan - He was great, kept working all game and used the ball well as expected, his missed set shot aside. Now in a fantastic position as a cash cow option.

Cumming - He was actually pretty good, just not enough quantity and so little pressure up field meant most of the Crows forward forays weren't going to be intercepted or turned over. Whitfield took a lot of his kickins early as well and Ash also stole some. Standard too many chefs playing out.

Daniels - Was really solid, looked good and scored very well.

Buckley - Late in but Haynes injured among with the carnage can't hurt his cause. Played well and beat Walker on the day pretty convincingly.

Ash - The defensive small primarily as expected, did have a few nice runs but with the Crows group of small forwards was always going to be defensive today.

Himmel - Forward until the injuries forced them to put an injured Haynes on the field where he basically sat in the goal square. If he didn't take mark of the year/decade today then I eagerly await whatever can get remotely near it, one of the best marks I've ever seen. He's a trash forward still.

Whitfield - Terrible in the first half, was actually starting to get into it when he got concussed. With his history of concussions you have to ask some serious questions at this point, definitely misses one but probably should miss more. No one should have picked him anyway.

Perryman - Did his hamstring in basically his first contest on the field.

Crows - What a disaster for them. They were bad but not as bad as the Giants in the first half but their awful finishing made it a chance instead of ending it and then they just switched off entirely in the 2nd half and let the Giants win. The fact they brought zero intensity or effort is the real concern, they let the Giants remove that from the game in the first half and then couldn't turn it back on when ROB started to get destroyed in the middle and the field changed.

Rachele - He was really solid, role decent and finished well when forward. Would want to see another week of it before going for him but could be some cash to be made here.

Dawson - Role as expected, never really got into this game, pretty solid score considering that.

ROB - A big reason they lost, he tried hard but his ruckwork basically resulted in Giants clearances in the 2nd half, when he won it he put it down their throat and when he lost it was non-competitive meaning Flynn put it down their throats. Coniglio, Kelly, Ward and Green must have all had 2 clean CB clearances each, probably more, Coniglio felt like about 5.

Keays - Forward role primarily, worked hard.

Rankine - Forward primarily, was solid but so wasteful, he really should have kicked all 7 shots.

Pedlar - Forward but roaming role, better than his preseason role. Looked good. Not sure he's worth it in SC but he played very well and was one of the few on the field who seemed to realise what team he played for when kicking it.

Laird - It's not so much the score as the way he played. That was absolutely pathetic. No workrate, no effort, no trying. He basically set the tone for their collapse. He wasn't good in Q1 but at least he was scoring when it was easy but the second it got remotely hard he gave up. He wasn't tagged, he didn't even get any attention outside the one stoppage that Perryman was at for the entire game. He missed a bunch of tackles, he missed two goals he should kick. This was an everything that could, did kind of game but the effort is the takeaway. Resisting a rage trade here is going to take some serious self control, especially with how many bargains went bang, will do very well to not lose 70k by round 5. That he ended my RDT, AFLF and SC seasons all at once was just an extra bonus. On a positive, I can stop caring about it for another year and can start to work on my golf game on the weekends again...

Milera - Played really well off half back, was calm and actually good defensively as well.

Michalanney - He was also really solid, held his own against both bigs and smalls which is a strong effort. Injury to Murray and potentially Butts as well would only sure him up, albeit probably better to have those two so he's not in the KP role.

McAdam - Laid an absolute ripper of a bump, shame it's not 2005 anymore because he's going to have a nice little holiday for it. For those who admire and remember the physical side of the sport though, do watch :LOL: Was definitely one of about 3 moments from this entire game that I'd actually want to watch again (Himmelberg and Haynes marks the other two).
 
Joined
21 Mar 2019
Messages
2,295
Likes
6,291
Depends what rankings position we are referring to or whether it is overall between every single competitor given the term "par" is used very loosely and usually a lack of methodology to back up predictions thus not beneficial.

Seems a pointless exercise to be concerned with as all will be revealed later tonight and still plenty of twists and turns in store to vary a "par" score.
Yeah I always thought "par" was something you started thinking about once you'd made it through the first 5-6 rounds and your possible fortunes for the season started becoming a bit more apparent - ie. if you're off to a fast start inside the top 1k then "par" will mean something different entirely compared to another team which is languishing in the 50k's due to bad luck on the 50/50 selections and with injury, for example.
 
Top