It's complicated for me. Firstly, I do think it's way too much to be spending over $600k on a defender; Stewart is about $50k cheaper and probably averages within a couple of points of Dawson; but Dawson probably easily clears Stewart on aggregate; but I own Dawson and don't have Stewart because I don't pick anyone who is or will be 30 or above during the H&A season; but Stewart would probably be the first exception to that rule if I were to choose. For me it's really close, but if you didn't like what you saw from Stewart I can understand avoiding him, but he does have massive ceiling potential and that $50k could really come in handy down the line. At the same price, I'd put Dawson ahead but I'm not sure he's worth $50k more.