Discussion 2023 Round 5: Team & In Game Discussion

What did you score?

  • Less than 2100

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2100 - 2149

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • 2150 - 2199

    Votes: 3 3.0%
  • 2200 - 2249

    Votes: 9 9.1%
  • 2250 - 2299

    Votes: 11 11.1%
  • 2300 - 2349

    Votes: 35 35.4%
  • 2350 - 2399

    Votes: 29 29.3%
  • 2400 - 2449

    Votes: 9 9.1%
  • 2450 - 2499

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • More than 2500

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    99
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
As a current non Oliver owner I've watched his score closely in this game (want to get him in of course when possible)

Possessions versus score increase/decrease

I think he's missed the target 12-15 times (both handball and kick) either gone to ground or opposition and he's gone +3 or +5 for the majority of Ineffective Possessions

I'll need to rematch the game, but the Oliver score to the "eye test" is farcical
100%, has been absolutely average.
 
Joined
29 Jan 2016
Messages
353
Likes
813
AFL Club
Carlton
As a current non Oliver owner I've watched his score closely in this game (want to get him in of course when possible)

Possessions versus score increase/decrease

I think he's missed the target 12-15 times (both handball and kick) either gone to ground or opposition and he's gone +3 or +5 for the majority of Ineffective Possessions

I'll need to rematch the game, but the Oliver score to the "eye test" is farcical
The 18 CPs maybe helping him. I think SC treats missing the target as less relevant if it was a hard ball get.
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,960
Likes
126,626
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
As a current non Oliver owner I've watched his score closely in this game (want to get him in of course when possible)

Possessions versus score increase/decrease

I think he's missed the target 12-15 times (both handball and kick) either gone to ground or opposition and he's gone +3 or +5 for the majority of Ineffective Possessions

I'll need to rematch the game, but the Oliver score to the "eye test" is farcical
C Oliver= 18 Contested Possessions (66.67% CPR)
Petracca the only other demon above 10
Only two bombers above 7

Second half= C Oliver= 14/17 Contested Possessions
Petracca the only other dee above 5 in the second half.
Parish and Shiel the only bombers above 5
 
Joined
6 Jun 2013
Messages
4,211
Likes
14,058
The 18 CPs maybe helping him. I think SC treats missing the target as less relevant if it was a hard ball get.

Effective kick = 4 Points
Ineffective kick = 0 Points
Clanger = -4 Points
Effective Handball = 1.5 Points
Ineffective handball = 0 Points
Handball clanger = -4 Points
Handball receive = 1.5 Point
Hardball get = 4.5 Points
Looseball get = 4.5 Points
Goal = 8 Points
Behind = 1 Point
Score assist = 3 points
Mark uncontested (maintaining possession) = 2 Points
Mark contested (maintaining possession) = 6 Points
Mark uncontested (from opposition) - otherwise known as an intercept mark = 4 Points
Mark contested (from opposition) - otherwise known as contested intercept mark = 8 Points
Tackles = 4 Points
Free kick for = 4 Points
Free kick against = -4 Points
Hitout = 0 points
Hitout to Advantage = 5 Points
Hitout sharked by opposition = -1 point
Gather from Hitout = 2 Points
50m penalty against = -8.5 points

More specifically:
MARK
from teammate, uncontested: 1
from teammate, contested: 3
from teammate, on lead: 3
from teammate, uncontested inside 50: 2
from teammate, contested inside 50: 5
from teammate, on lead inside 50: 4
from opp, uncontested: 3
from opp, contested: 6

KICK
Ineffective: 0
Backwards: 1
Long (40m+) to opp: 0
Long (40m+) to contest: 2
Effective short or long: 3
Long to advantage: 5

HANDBALL
Ineffective: 0
Effective: 1
 
Joined
23 Mar 2014
Messages
6,389
Likes
17,516
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Umpire 38 you clearly missed seeing the fend off with the forearm by Hinds in that viney tackle…clearly holding the ball and you choose to have a ball up …
 
Top