Discussion 2023 Round 7: Teams & In Game Discussion

What was your final score?

  • Less than 2100

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • 2100 - 2149

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • 2150 - 2199

    Votes: 8 9.1%
  • 2200 - 2249

    Votes: 9 10.2%
  • 2250 - 2299

    Votes: 19 21.6%
  • 2300 - 2349

    Votes: 27 30.7%
  • 2350 - 2399

    Votes: 13 14.8%
  • 2400 - 2449

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • 2450 - 2499

    Votes: 6 6.8%
  • More than 2500

    Votes: 1 1.1%

  • Total voters
    88
Joined
13 Jun 2022
Messages
5,228
Likes
17,245
AFL Club
St Kilda
Great game that one. Crows sub being an inside mid forced them to move Dawson out of the middle, then they got smashed in the clearances. Not sure was best sub choice but I guess with Laird under a cloud there was some logic.

2477 looks a good score in my leagues.

Setterfield 51 dissapointing but he's popular in the top 1000.

More dissapointing was me playing a key forward (even if it was vs North) in JVR for 33, when I could've taken Cincotta (88!)

Also if I hadn't have gotten tricky with my midfield loop (put Ashcroft on the bench for the loop) - I may have taken McKenna's 70 in defence over JVR too. Oh well loops been handy for me this year!
Great score! glad I wasn't up against you this week (y)
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,958
Likes
126,611
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Yeah, I'm sorry. We've seen figures like that before, with 7 Clangers and a low DE score less than 120.
Not too many with a similar kick to handball ratio (not privy to kicking efficiency stats from the game yet). With the 3300 rule, similar stat lines will vary dependant on result, relative to the performances of the other 45 players, etc. Double figure disposals in the final quarter with only three other Crows registering more than 4 in a losing effort could have contributed as well for a boost in the last.

ROB historically boasts a low hitout to advantage rate, handballs too much with a poor kicking efficiency which limits his ceiling and does not contribute as much around the ground comparative to other rucks.
 
Joined
23 Mar 2019
Messages
2,131
Likes
7,021
Great game that one. Crows sub being an inside mid forced them to move Dawson out of the middle, then they got smashed in the clearances. Not sure was best sub choice but I guess with Laird under a cloud there was some logic.

2477 looks a good score in my leagues.

Setterfield 51 dissapointing but he's popular in the top 1000.

More dissapointing was me playing a key forward (even if it was vs North) in JVR for 33, when I could've taken Cincotta (88!)

Also if I hadn't have gotten tricky with my midfield loop (put Ashcroft on the bench for the loop) - I may have taken McKenna's 70 in defence over JVR too. Oh well loops been handy for me this year!
Essendon used an inside mid as a sub last week, and Collingwood just ran all over them in the last. Maybe should have learned?
 
Joined
3 Dec 2014
Messages
4,358
Likes
7,050
AFL Club
Essendon
2280 Taranto

Very disappointed, expect to fall well outside of the top 1000. Decision to take Taranto over Daicos was clutch. Fergus over Samson the one that really stings. I had Samson on field all week but the consensus among some of the SC groups I'm in was unanimously to go Fergus and I went against my own gut. Got what was deserved, 43 points down the drain.
 
Top