Discussion 2024 Round 5: Teams & In Game Discussion

[Russty_]

Clohesy has to be 100% owned next week.

I had him traded in this week for D'Ambrosio but reversed it, and am ok with that, lost some points but D'Ambrosio scored well so now it'll be Pink to Clohesy next week. Someone said a few pages back, whoever doesn't have Clohesy after next week must be a ghost ship, that's a pretty good indicator, I'll be interested to see how owned he is.

 

[Monya Meow Meow]

All I can say is that these GC rookies are a godsent during upgrade season.
Thanks Dimma!

 

[Plan B]

18/1953 Gawn C
Is that a good score so far?

 

[jobeywatto]

Touk 134, Clohesy 124, Flanders 113, D'Ambrosio 94, Young 115, Rozee 118, Jackson 78. Good night.

 

[Maccas marvels]

Clohesy has to be 100% owned next week.

Except for the one guy who traded him out lol

 

[Plan B]

Clohesy ended up on 124
Next week will be monster $$

If he scores 110 today, his BE next week will be around -158.
The minute he steps on the field, he'd be +$69,700.

 

[Connoisseur]

10/1048
Three involved from each match tonight. Will be interesting to see how the GC rookies go as I went early on both but will only be fielding Clohesy over Howes as I did not loop Sanders with Graham. Big watch on the role of Georgiades tonight.

And what a result from the GC duo. McKercher benched to bank Graham and Clohesy was fielded over Howes. Seemed like Georgiades was not as high up the ground this round so may pass.

18/1862
Played: M Gawn (C), N Martin, S Darcy, R Sanders,M Bontempelli, T Green, J Steele, H Thomas, A Cadman, D Wilson, Z Williams, T Miller, S Clohesy (new recruit), M D’Ambrosio, Z Butters, H Young and N Fyfe

Yet to play:
Sunday: T Stewart, H Sheezel, O Dempsey

McKercher and Reid unlucky to be sitting on the bench this round but will be banking Graham and Thomas instead. With Stewart, Sheezel and Dempsey left, the expectation would be that all the sub 70 scores (Cadman, Wilson and Sanders) drop out. This will leave Green and Bontempelli as my two lowest scores for a total of 1691 from 15.

 

[Tamuhawk]

13/1439 (Serong)

With Sheezel, Powell, McKercher, Reid & Campbell left to play. Despite a great night of scoring... Looks OK at first but there's 3 rookies and an MP yet to play. Damage was done with English yday.

 

[Rowsus]

Rowsus - 17/1,702 - Steele - Sheezel, McKercher, Comben, Dempsey, Reid to come
4 low scores to drop out: 46, 61, 62, 66 - hopefully 13/1,467 - aiming for around 1,860 with a little luck (projected 1,845)

Wife - 17/1,698 - Steele - Sheezel, McKercher, Dempsey, Brown, Reid to come
4 low scores to drop out: 46, 59, 61, 64 - hopefully 13/1,468 - aiming for 1,860 with a little luck (projected 1,853)

Rowsus has Comben v Wife has Brown, hoping both can go 66+!
There's nothing in it!!!!

 

[Rowsus]

Clohesy ended up on 124
Next week will be monster $$

Roughly +$74k for stepping on the field, and needs to score around 60 to be +$100,000.

 

[Maccas marvels]

17/1765 with Gawn VC…
expecting from that score Sanders 46, Sharp 54, Khamis 64 to drop out,
Steele 143, Ryan 145, Butters 124, Clohesy 124, Flanders 112, Serong 111, Dambrosio 94, Williams 92, Jackson 77 and Fyfe 76…
Stewart, Sheezel, Xerri, Mckercher and Dempsey to come…
Projected 2,068…
not sure if that’s above PAR or not this round?
feels okay considering the carnage?

 

[jobeywatto]

Rozee +7 in scaling, Jackson -6...

 

[Connoisseur]

18/1953 Gawn C
Is that a good score so far?

Two matches left to play in a best 18 round, so hard to tell and doesn’t really matter yet. Depends on your definition of good given the variation between posters as to what “good is”. Are you talking in regards to competition wide, site wide, top 1%, your current ranking position, etc?

 

[Tamuhawk]

Rozee +7 in scaling, Jackson -6...

Yessss... needed every point I could get. 🤣

 

[Zim^zuM]

Clohesy ended up on 124
Next week will be monster $$

If he doesn't drop off his price rises will be irrelevant lol. Locked as a Def starter.

 

[Connoisseur]

17/1765 with Gawn VC…
expecting from that score Sanders 46, Sharp 54, Khamis 64 to drop out,
Steele 143, Ryan 145, Butters 124, Clohesy 124, Flanders 112, Serong 111, Dambrosio 94, Williams 92, Jackson 77 and Fyfe 76…
Stewart, Sheezel, Xerri, Mckercher and Dempsey to come…
Projected 2,068…
not sure if that’s above PAR or not this round?
feels okay considering the carnage?

What do you mean by PAR and why is it of any importance yet?

 

[Creeker]

I had him traded in this week for D'Ambrosio but reversed it, and am ok with that, lost some points but D'Ambrosio scored well so now it'll be Pink to Clohesy next week. Someone said a few pages back, whoever doesn't have Clohesy after next week must be a ghost ship, that's a pretty good indicator, I'll be interested to see how owned he is.

I grabbed him this week as I watched him last week and it looked like he had played at a senior level for years. (very composed.)
I also knew there would be a few others that would have to be traded in this week.
Was a easy decision though, Coffield to Clohesy. Not to much to lose with that trade.

 

[Bombers2win]

15/1612 Proj 1931 4 lowest 46 54 61 62, have Carrol’s 26 sitting on the pine still debating whether to take it or hope the Clark clears it with a full game! Feel like I’m on par with the crowd maybe a bit behind.

 

[Plan B]

Two matches left to play in a best 18 round, so hard to tell and doesn’t really matter yet. Depends on your definition of good given the variation between posters as to what “good is”. Are you talking in regards to competition wide, site wide, top 1%, your current ranking position, etc?

Competition wide. It feels like a good score in the leagues I’m playing.

 

[Ben's Beasts]

14/1617 (Gawn)

Sheezel, Powell, McKercher and Reid to come.

 

[Under The Dome]

Butters also went +6 and Houston +4