Opinion Questions For Rowsus
- Thread starter Rowsus
- Start date
- Status
Your observations would seem correct. Quote on superfooty:
'Tagger Ryan Crowley was one of the main reasons why the Dockers were so feared last season but he has struggled to stop the oppositions prime movers this season. In 2013, Crowley kept his opponent to fewer than 20 touches in eight of 23 matches but in 2014, his opponent has won more than 20 touches every game'.
Stat isn't that remarkable as 8/23 is only 35% of games but it does go to show he might not be has damaging has he has been in the past. Having said that, Rowsus stat on Selwood against Freo is a lot more impressive and I think I will be waiting a week.
'Tagger Ryan Crowley was one of the main reasons why the Dockers were so feared last season but he has struggled to stop the oppositions prime movers this season. In 2013, Crowley kept his opponent to fewer than 20 touches in eight of 23 matches but in 2014, his opponent has won more than 20 touches every game'.
Stat isn't that remarkable as 8/23 is only 35% of games but it does go to show he might not be has damaging has he has been in the past. Having said that, Rowsus stat on Selwood against Freo is a lot more impressive and I think I will be waiting a week.
Hey BigL,
I think he is playing to his shown potential this season, but I will be avoiding him.
Firstly, he is priced to what he is scoring. Ideally we want to trade in players that are under-priced, not correctly priced or over-priced.
Secondly his game count puts me off. From 2010 it reads: 11, 22, 2, 18. I think he's a risk of needing trading out if/when injury hits again. Which is all the more reason to want value when grabbing him.
Those that grabbed him early at $442,600 have done well, but I think you are inviting trouble if you pay $500k for him now.
I think he is playing to his shown potential this season, but I will be avoiding him.
Firstly, he is priced to what he is scoring. Ideally we want to trade in players that are under-priced, not correctly priced or over-priced.
Secondly his game count puts me off. From 2010 it reads: 11, 22, 2, 18. I think he's a risk of needing trading out if/when injury hits again. Which is all the more reason to want value when grabbing him.
Those that grabbed him early at $442,600 have done well, but I think you are inviting trouble if you pay $500k for him now.
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2014
- Messages
- 114
- Likes
- 3
- AFL Club
- Essendon
I've been a long time lurkerer and damn I love your work Rowsus! Never ceases to amaze me with how much effort you go through with all the analysis you go do!
Anyways my question to you is who do you think will score more after their bye out of Brent Harvey, Drew Petrie and Dusty? Planning to get one of these guys for Higgins with money not being an issue. Thanks in advance Rowsus!
Anyways my question to you is who do you think will score more after their bye out of Brent Harvey, Drew Petrie and Dusty? Planning to get one of these guys for Higgins with money not being an issue. Thanks in advance Rowsus!
Thanks for the kind words, OMW.
Looking at the players histories, and what I have them projected to score for the season:
Petrie, last 4 seasons: 56 (only 2 games), 94, 95, 103 - projection 89
Harvey, last 4 seasons: 100, 101, 96, 104 - projection 101
Martin, last 4 seasons: 78, 99, 89, 102 - projection 95
The projections are just my own adjusted figures from my preseason "guesstimates". Partly adjusted on a formula, partly adjusted on gut feel. All 3 are reasonably reliable as far as not missing games is concerned, so if the projections turn out to be in the ballpark, we end up with:
Petrie averaging around 100 from here.
Harvey averaging around 101 from here.
Martin averaging around 98 from here.
As you can see, there isn't much in it. Harvey just on points, Petrie easily on value.
Good luck
Looking at the players histories, and what I have them projected to score for the season:
Petrie, last 4 seasons: 56 (only 2 games), 94, 95, 103 - projection 89
Harvey, last 4 seasons: 100, 101, 96, 104 - projection 101
Martin, last 4 seasons: 78, 99, 89, 102 - projection 95
The projections are just my own adjusted figures from my preseason "guesstimates". Partly adjusted on a formula, partly adjusted on gut feel. All 3 are reasonably reliable as far as not missing games is concerned, so if the projections turn out to be in the ballpark, we end up with:
Petrie averaging around 100 from here.
Harvey averaging around 101 from here.
Martin averaging around 98 from here.
As you can see, there isn't much in it. Harvey just on points, Petrie easily on value.
Good luck
Last edited:
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2014
- Messages
- 114
- Likes
- 3
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Thanks for the kind words, OMW.
Looking at the players histories, and what I have them projected to score for the season:
Petrie, last 4 seasons: 56 (only 2 games), 94, 95, 103 - projection 89
Harvey, last 4 seasons: 100, 101, 96, 104 - projection 101
Martin, last 4 seasons: 78, 99, 89, 102 - projection 95
The projections are just my own adjusted figures from my preseason "guesstimates". Partly adjusted on a formula, partly adjusted on gut feel. All 3 are reasonably reliable as far as missing games is concerned, so if the projections turn out to be in the ballpark, we end up with:
Petrie averaging around 100 from here.
Harvey averaging around 101 from here.
Martin averaging around 98 from here.
As you can see, there isn't much in it. Harvey just on points, Petrie easily on value.
Good luck
Looking at the players histories, and what I have them projected to score for the season:
Petrie, last 4 seasons: 56 (only 2 games), 94, 95, 103 - projection 89
Harvey, last 4 seasons: 100, 101, 96, 104 - projection 101
Martin, last 4 seasons: 78, 99, 89, 102 - projection 95
The projections are just my own adjusted figures from my preseason "guesstimates". Partly adjusted on a formula, partly adjusted on gut feel. All 3 are reasonably reliable as far as missing games is concerned, so if the projections turn out to be in the ballpark, we end up with:
Petrie averaging around 100 from here.
Harvey averaging around 101 from here.
Martin averaging around 98 from here.
As you can see, there isn't much in it. Harvey just on points, Petrie easily on value.
Good luck
Thanks for the kind words, OMW.
Looking at the players histories, and what I have them projected to score for the season:
Petrie, last 4 seasons: 56 (only 2 games), 94, 95, 103 - projection 89
Harvey, last 4 seasons: 100, 101, 96, 104 - projection 101
Martin, last 4 seasons: 78, 99, 89, 102 - projection 95
The projections are just my own adjusted figures from my preseason "guesstimates". Partly adjusted on a formula, partly adjusted on gut feel. All 3 are reasonably reliable as far as missing games is concerned, so if the projections turn out to be in the ballpark, we end up with:
Petrie averaging around 100 from here.
Harvey averaging around 101 from here.
Martin averaging around 98 from here.
As you can see, there isn't much in it. Harvey just on points, Petrie easily on value.
Good luck
Looking at the players histories, and what I have them projected to score for the season:
Petrie, last 4 seasons: 56 (only 2 games), 94, 95, 103 - projection 89
Harvey, last 4 seasons: 100, 101, 96, 104 - projection 101
Martin, last 4 seasons: 78, 99, 89, 102 - projection 95
The projections are just my own adjusted figures from my preseason "guesstimates". Partly adjusted on a formula, partly adjusted on gut feel. All 3 are reasonably reliable as far as missing games is concerned, so if the projections turn out to be in the ballpark, we end up with:
Petrie averaging around 100 from here.
Harvey averaging around 101 from here.
Martin averaging around 98 from here.
As you can see, there isn't much in it. Harvey just on points, Petrie easily on value.
Good luck
- Status