I think we might have too high an expectation on first year rookies. In the past 3 drafts only 5 players have managed to average over 70 in their first year.
This is not exhaustive, but I just took a look at a few of the top non KP players from the past 3 drafts
2021
JHF 63.4
Callaghan 55.4
Naicos 91.3 (averaged 77.73 in first 11 games)
Rachelle 52.2
Ward 63.8
Erasmus 41.8
NWM 51.8
2022
Ashcroft 84.5 (averaged 77.56 first 9 games)
Sheezel 99.5
Wardlaw 65.4
Humphrey 59.3
McKenzie 48.6
Ginbey 63.5
Philippou 63.5
2023
Watson 65.5
Windsor 59.6
Mckercher 88.5 (averaged 77.67 first 9 games)
Duursma. 36.1
Reid 80.5 (averaged 73.22 first 9 games)
Sanders 62.9
So across the last 3 drafts, only 5 managed to average over 70. Three of those played off half back (Naicos, Sheezel, Mckercher). The only 2 playing more midfield were Ashcroft and Reid.
apologies if I have missed someone, but I guess my point is for O’Driscoll, a 70 point return for the same price point as the top end rookies is actually a really good result and potentially puts him at the pointy end of the list.
This is not exhaustive, but I just took a look at a few of the top non KP players from the past 3 drafts
2021
JHF 63.4
Callaghan 55.4
Naicos 91.3 (averaged 77.73 in first 11 games)
Rachelle 52.2
Ward 63.8
Erasmus 41.8
NWM 51.8
2022
Ashcroft 84.5 (averaged 77.56 first 9 games)
Sheezel 99.5
Wardlaw 65.4
Humphrey 59.3
McKenzie 48.6
Ginbey 63.5
Philippou 63.5
2023
Watson 65.5
Windsor 59.6
Mckercher 88.5 (averaged 77.67 first 9 games)
Duursma. 36.1
Reid 80.5 (averaged 73.22 first 9 games)
Sanders 62.9
So across the last 3 drafts, only 5 managed to average over 70. Three of those played off half back (Naicos, Sheezel, Mckercher). The only 2 playing more midfield were Ashcroft and Reid.
apologies if I have missed someone, but I guess my point is for O’Driscoll, a 70 point return for the same price point as the top end rookies is actually a really good result and potentially puts him at the pointy end of the list.
The thing that stood out for me is the draft picks that the 70+ scorers went at:
H Reid - pick 1
McKercher - pick 2
W Ashcroft - pick 2, possibly 1 if not father-son
Sheezel - pick 3
N Daicos - pick 4, would have been 1 or 2 if not father-son
So they were basically all top 3 pick quality. 4 of the 5 essentially being #1 or 2, with Sheezel only one spot behind.
This suggests to me that if coaches are forecasting 70+ from their new draftees, they likely need to be extremely high draft picks - or have some other unusual factor (eg playing HBF) in their favour.
Other young players take longer to come on.