Hi Rowsus, I was going to trade Saad and Oxley this week, and trading out two defenders, one up (to Houli) one down (probably to Hamling), is central to my trading plans, but I am thinking that I would rather trade Lumumba and keep one of those rookies. Do you think this is a good idea and, if so, which one would you keep?
Thanks in advance, I really appreciate what you are doing with this thread, although I don't ask many questions, I still gain a great deal of informed feedback just from reading your responses.
Hi Brookesy, thanks for the good feedback.
Lumumba $359,900 - B/E 70 - average 74
Oxley $392,200 - B/E 5 - average 84
Saad $389,300 - B/E 64 - average 84
If you think you can get by without the extra $29-$32k that trading one of the rookies out, then by all means trade out Lumumba.
Remember, the $30k isn't just useable this week, or next week, it might make a difference in 3 or 4 weeks, who you have to choose amongst.
The other question is, where are you heading? Is the one you keep out of those three players going to be loopholed at D6/7, or are you going to trade them all out at some stage?
If you think all three will be traded out, sooner or later, then keep Oxley, as his B/E says he will make more dollars.
If you intend to keep one as a D6/7 loophole, then you need to weigh up whether you think Saad might find his first season of AFL a bit hard, and will start to get niggling injuries, like he did on Saturday, which could lead to tired lower scores, or missed games, or if you are happy to keep Lumumba's likely 75-80/game scores. While I expect Oxley, with his up and down scoring, might just outscore the other two, the other two's DPP might come in handy for cover in the last 4 or 5 weeks of the season.
Let the dollars be your first decision, and if you think you can live without the extra $30k, maybe keep Saad.