Player X vs. Player Y

Ben's Beasts

Leadership Group
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
19,074
Likes
80,340
AFL Club
Melbourne
Nah to fond of English, but if you think he is the best rookie to sacrifice then I guess I could consider it
I think in your position I would bypass English and just stick with Olango. But If you really want English then I would probably cut ZGL of the ones you mentioned as I don't think his scoring capacity is too great and in a good team like GWS I think his JS is reasonably shaky.
 
G

GoGeta

Righto, I've backed myself into a bit of a corner here and I have the VC on Dusty and no FD

I am going to need to bring a FD in...so who out of the following would you sacrifice to bring in a FD...

Doedee v Finlayson v Holman v Banfield v ZGL v Ryan
Id drop Ryan, but just about everyone is more keen on him than i am.
 
Joined
1 Feb 2014
Messages
1,995
Likes
6,950
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Righto, I've backed myself into a bit of a corner here and I have the VC on Dusty and no FD

I am going to need to bring a FD in...so who out of the following would you sacrifice to bring in a FD...

Doedee v Finlayson v Holman v Banfield v ZGL v Ryan
I was in a similar position but rather than sacrifice Doedee/Finlayson/Holman/Ryan I got rid of English and brought Olango in.
 

lakb24

200 Games Club
Joined
23 Mar 2012
Messages
1,136
Likes
67
AFL Club
Essendon
Bonner & Tom Bell + 132k (to bring in Danger potentially) VS Venables & Hurley/Hibberd?
 
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
4,890
Likes
11,150
AFL Club
West Coast
Mclean v Sicily ( might be already mentioned )
Brayshaw v banfield or both
McLean more likely to be a premium, more mid/wing time and talk Dahlhause was up for trade last year as surplus to their needs. Sicily high volatility player, tag risk, 80k cheaper and better dpp.

Banfield - better value, could easily average the same.

Mclean healthy, Lobb value and with limited game showed he can be 100 type player although this is based on just a few games. With limited quality rook depth, if Lobb misses any games then back up score will be questionable. would go Lobb if this is F5-6.

Barry. we know Gellong announced Tim Kelly earlier in the week and Scott said Fog was behind Constable all week in his thinking, Fog got the nod because he is a better foward. Assuming he disappears when Danger back.

Barry - named late, although no other port rooks were announced earlier. think Port is close to full strength except for Gray.

Think Barry, both Fogs, Murphy and Doodee could all be missing next week.
 
Joined
20 May 2014
Messages
3,346
Likes
8,275
AFL Club
St Kilda
A very late X vs. Y...

Danger + Rookie

vs.

Coniglio + Devon/Petracca
Reckon option 2 is 80 points up on this round alone, and probably up most weeks anyway, even factoring for C scores. Option 2 by a long way. Like both Devon and Petracca but probably Devon first.
 
Joined
9 Jun 2016
Messages
32
Likes
0
AFL Club
Melbourne
Barry. we know Gellong announced Tim Kelly earlier in the week and Scott said Fog was behind Constable all week in his thinking, Fog got the nod because he is a better foward. Assuming he disappears when Danger back.

Barry - named late, although no other port rooks were announced earlier. think Port is close to full strength except for Gray.

Think Barry, both Fogs, Murphy and Doodee could all be missing next week.
Sorry GFB, I meant D Fogarty from Adelaide. My thinking is he may have better JS now with Lynch and Tex missing R1
 
Top