Player X vs. Player Y
- Thread starter Jurn Stern
- Start date
cmon MMM, there plenty of high scoring names.
Mason Woods, Westoff, Parfitt, Sam Reid, Buddy and Mitch Robinson! Plenty of history to back them up, some even come with a guarantee that their average will not drop this round.
Mason Woods, Westoff, Parfitt, Sam Reid, Buddy and Mitch Robinson! Plenty of history to back them up, some even come with a guarantee that their average will not drop this round.
If I was having a go at who else would be a top forward by year's end I'd be looking at names like JJK, Mundy, Westhoff, Robinson and Boak in roughly that order. Most of us will have one or two spots already full in either line with a Smith or Hibberd type, so you may not need to go outside the top five you and I have mentioned.
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 11,173
- Likes
- 13,044
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Fair points re Greene and Buddy. Buddy was looking a bit more reliable as of a month ago (he's been better in his last couple of years), less so today, especially given some of the chatter that there could be more to it.
JJK is actually quite a good option if he can get back to his former scoring levels in my view, especially as he'll be cheap, is usually quite durable, and has a massive ceiling. Could be an okay loop option, although I think WC probably still play late quite a bit in the second half of the year. Would also want to be confident on his role ... Darling and Waterman have both surprised in the upside, not sure if that has affected JJK somehow.
JJK is actually quite a good option if he can get back to his former scoring levels in my view, especially as he'll be cheap, is usually quite durable, and has a massive ceiling. Could be an okay loop option, although I think WC probably still play late quite a bit in the second half of the year. Would also want to be confident on his role ... Darling and Waterman have both surprised in the upside, not sure if that has affected JJK somehow.
Yes, I think Ronke is an option after this week, although I believe he needs to keep hitting high 70s to make $150k from then onwards, so I'm not sure I would back that in. I'll think about it, but I feel like the horse may have largely bolted, well done to those who brought him in.
I had the same thought re Fritsch/Billings last night ... it increasingly feels like I have one more uograde to do than I had thought. Plenty of cash in the kitty for next week though, I might even go double up.
I had the same thought re Fritsch/Billings last night ... it increasingly feels like I have one more uograde to do than I had thought. Plenty of cash in the kitty for next week though, I might even go double up.
Depends on your bye structure and mentality I reckon. If you are ranked a long way back and want to try things, I'd go Webster. If you are ranked right up the top and are looking for a POD to set you apart, Webster over Simpson isn't a bad shout. Simpson has the history, is consistent, has the best bye and looks like great value at his current price. I would say he is the safe option and I am bringing him in this week.
I feel like Danger is ready to go bang. I'd want him in my team as soon as possible. Oliver's BE only 75 but I feel like Danger is a more urgent matter.
I feel like Yeo's scoring potential is higher so I'd be leaning towards him. I'm getting both this week though. Feel Simpson is great value at 501k.
I feel like Danger is ready to go bang. I'd want him in my team as soon as possible. Oliver's BE only 75 but I feel like Danger is a more urgent matter.
I feel like Yeo's scoring potential is higher so I'd be leaning towards him. I'm getting both this week though. Feel Simpson is great value at 501k.
