Player X vs. Player Y

[blue dreamer]

JJK conundrum.

keep him or

Trade to de Goey or

Trade to Hurley via Sicily fwd.

Don't want to spend my small bank as planning on probably bringing in Gazza next week to complete.

Someone else around the same price mark?

I like De Goey over Hurley which the numbers probably don’t support. I reckon De Goey would be fun, especially with their easy run home. Also, playing for a big fat juicy contract iirc!

Hahha, ended up bringing in another variable and going to Gunston.

 

[IDIG]

Hahha, ended up bringing in another variable and going to Gunston.

I like Gunston too. Worthy of the VC this week too!

 

[steeveey_86]

Would appreciate people's opinion on finalising my F6. Weighing up between bringing in Sicily or Westhoff. Thoughts....???

 

[dicksilverman]

sicily easy

 

[Crabby Skills]

Any pies fans.... Pendles or Sidebum for the way home? Pendles is still dependlebury, but it seems to be 90s now instead of 110s. Or is this just from the ankle or something

 

[KellyMartinToNorth2018]

Gray vs Westhoff?

 

[30BucketsofRo]

Gray vs Westhoff?

Robbie, don’t think he will play exclusively forward all the time. Think he will still rotate as needed. Think Westhoff was a better pick when Ryder was injured.

 

[Seedsman]

T. Murphy v S.Taylor as a downgrade

 

[Ntay4]

Westhoff vs Gunston

 

[BigRuss]

Gray vs Westhoff?

Westhoff for me, Gray more likely to spend more time forward with Rocky finding some form, too valuable close to goa.

 

[Courtesans]

Any pies fans.... Pendles or Sidebum for the way home? Pendles is still dependlebury, but it seems to be 90s now instead of 110s. Or is this just from the ankle or something

I have him. 90's player at the moment.

 

[Crabby Skills]

I have him. 90's player at the moment.

Haha so you'd prefer to have Sidebottom then?

 

[Prochard]

Any pies fans.... Pendles or Sidebum for the way home? Pendles is still dependlebury, but it seems to be 90s now instead of 110s. Or is this just from the ankle or something

Wouldn't say either player is good enough fantasy wise. Sidebottom possibly viable in DT but don't think Pendles is a bit off. Pendles sooner or later will play half back, his contested ball winning ability has regressed so much since his prime years, and it's just a shame such an extraodinary player over his career will probably retire without having won a brownlow.

Why do you have to choose between these 2? Treloar/Oliver/Kelly seem like much better options at less than 100k more expensive

 

[Crabby Skills]

Wouldn't say either player is good enough fantasy wise. Sidebottom possibly viable in DT but don't think Pendles is a bit off. Pendles sooner or later will play half back, his contested ball winning ability has regressed so much since his prime years, and it's just a shame such an extraodinary player over his career will probably retire without having won a brownlow.

Why do you have to choose between these 2? Treloar/Oliver/Kelly seem like much better options at less than 100k more expensive

Allowed me to conserve a trade and keep Fritsch - but I think there's no point having Fritsch at f7 if it means having to go Pendles over Kelly! Thanks!

 

[30BucketsofRo]

Looking to finish off my team. Currently need an upgrade at F6.
Thoughts on grabbing a forward like Wingard/Buddy/Walters/Menegola vs pushing Sicily forward and paying overs for Lloyd?

 

[Tamuhawk]

Phillips to Wingard (or any fwd under 440k) and keep Petracca for M9/F7.
OR
Petracca to any fwd premo (Tmac/De Goey/Menegola/Hoff)

 

[Prochard]

Phillips to Wingard (or any fwd under 440k) and keep Petracca for M9/F7.
OR
Petracca to any fwd premo (Tmac/De Goey/Menegola/Hoff)

Phillips to Wingard then loop Wingard and Petracca

 

[Courtesans]

Witherden or Lambert?

 

[benderiffic]

Yeo v McLean?

 

[Crabby Skills]

Phillips to Wingard (or any fwd under 440k) and keep Petracca for M9/F7.
OR
Petracca to any fwd premo (Tmac/De Goey/Menegola/Hoff)

Really liking Wingard's role at the moment, and if Port fans are thinking it'll last then you've gotta go option #1.