Discussion Rookie Roulette!

[BomberSam]

58 from Clarke or risk Baker?

I would take Clarke but that is playing safe. Likely more to gain than to lose, just more likely to lose.

Similar: Clarke 63 vs. Hind?

 

[Goodie's Guns]

Similar: Clarke 63 vs. Hind?

Yeah also tossing this one up. Real borderline risk vs. play it safe score Clarke has produced.

 

[Monya Meow Meow]

Clarke's 63 v Gibbons?

 

[Courtesans]

Clarke's 63 v Gibbons?

What is going for Gibbons is obviously no Cripps. 63 pretty good for a lower order batsman though.

 

[quite ironic]

Clarke's 63 v Gibbons?

Clarke’s 63 without a blink.

 

[AngryAnt]

Also on the Clarke vs Hind or Bewley roulette.

 

[Grundogging]

Hately's 55 vs Oskar Baker?

Was hoping this wouldn't even be a thing but here we are...

 

[blue dreamer]

What Roulette, Cripps and Rockliff on bench means Clarke, Bewley, Hind M 6-8.

More like a round 1 midfield

 

[Rumbler]

Heyyy all! With Cripps out, will need to select 2 out the following 3 players to field:
Hately, Setterfield, D.Clarke

Currently have Hately on the field along with Stocker as a loop option with Clarke as (E),
Any thoughts/suggestions!?

 

[Professor]

Dilemma, have Hind and Clarke onfield, do they outscore Chol? I can swing a premium forward to the mids to have one less rookie score in the mids. Or do I save Chol for a late out, ie: Boak lol.

 

[Tamuhawk]

Dilemma, have Hind and Clarke onfield, do they outscore Chol? I can swing a premium forward to the mids to have one less rookie score in the mids. Or do I save Chol for a late out, ie: Boak lol.

Chol up against GWS so might struggle. I would play Hind and Clarke.

 

[Professor]

Chol up against GWS so might struggle. I would play Hind and Clarke.

Thanks Tam

 

[Tamuhawk]

Didn't think I'd be going back to this thread this year... but with Jelly still out and now Fyfe out it's forced my hand.

Which two to field? (Most likely the first two)
Clarke, Duursma & Bewley.

But more inportantly who to put the E on?
Initially I thought E on Clarke as he plays first but he'll probably outscore both Duursma and Bewley. Thinking E on Duursma now?

 

[Darkie]

Didn't think I'd be going back to this thread this year... but with Jelly still out and now Fyfe out it's forced my hand.

Which two to field? (Most likely the first two)
Clarke, Duursma & Bewley.

But more inportantly who to put the E on?
Initially I thought E on Clarke as he plays first but he'll probably outscore both Duursma and Bewley. Thinking E on Duursma now?

Clarke and Duursma are both averaging more than Bewley’s best score. Unless you expect something unusual this week, it sounds like Clarke on field and Duursma E with Bewley backup (assuming your donuts allow it) would be the way to go.

 

[Tamuhawk]

Clarke and Duursma are both averaging more than Bewley’s best score. Unless you expect something unusual this week, it sounds like Clarke on field and Duursma E with Bewley backup (assuming your donuts allow it) would be the way to go.

Yeah just as I thought aswell. Fyfe donut allows it so I should be fine there. So looping Duursma & Bewley it is. Cheers.

 

[Rumbler]

Logue or Answerth?
They are both going to play at pretty much the same time

 

[Nest]

O Baker v Hately v Bewley

Have to trade one out this week, but they're now all playing! Who goes?

 

[Zimmer]

Hately v Clarke v Hill (v Butters)

 

[NT.Thunder]

Rookies are always hard to judge buy I'd look at:
TOG
Role
Opposition
Previous scoring

 

[Zimmer]

O Baker v Hately v Bewley

Have to trade one out this week, but they're now all playing! Who goes?

Jeez, that's a curly one. I was surprised when Hately was picked. Was on my chopping block this week. He has the highest BE too. None of them seem that reliable JS wise. Probably Hately.