Picking Scorchers players to bring in next round is proving problematic for me at this stage. They are the same rabble as last season.
3 may even be too much. Why they did not keep S.Marsh on the books is beyond me, is there a reason?
Picking Scorchers players to bring in next round is proving problematic for me at this stage. They are the same rabble as last season.
3 may even be too much. Why they did not keep S.Marsh on the books is beyond me, is there a reason?
Picking Scorchers players to bring in next round is proving problematic for me at this stage. They are the same rabble as last season.
3 may even be too much. Why they did not keep S.Marsh on the books is beyond me, is there a reason?
Also, too many Scorchers could be an undoing of many teams come round 5 when they have the same bye as the Strikers - assuming teams are loaded with Strikers due to their round 4 DGW.
Agreed. I'm not sure who is worth a crack. Livingstone will be a bit cheaper based off his score, but at the same time, the whole team seems weak.
Probably worth getting in Marsh given he'll spend a lot of time in the middle...
ontractually obliged to do (and assuming got a lot of money for) for Airbnb.
Livingstone needs to get a bowl for me to bring him in Bomberboy. Bancroft might be worth a punt, cheap as chips but that may end in tears.
Richardson in for Sams might also pay off. I think Morris may effect Sam's output so he is under scrutiny tonight.
Picking Scorchers players to bring in next round is proving problematic for me at this stage. They are the same rabble as last season.
3 may even be too much. Why they did not keep S.Marsh on the books is beyond me, is there a reason?
Also, too many Scorchers could be an undoing of many teams come round 5 when they have the same bye as the Strikers - assuming teams are loaded with Strikers due to their round 4 DGW.
Great point Diabolical. Without seeing the Strikers perform and team makeup I will be erring on the side of caution with bringing in no more
then 2 Scorchers at this stage. They may fire in Perth but who knows?
Also, too many Scorchers could be an undoing of many teams come round 5 when they have the same bye as the Strikers - assuming teams are loaded with Strikers due to their round 4 DGW.
and C. Green is in many squads so there is limited scope to adjust. That being said Green looked the goods last night and he will certainly
get time at the crease going by last nights abysmal top order batting from the Scorchers. Livingstone unlucky with his dismissal. DRS
instead of that 90 second waste of space might of been handy ( money issue for CA ).
and C. Green is in many squads so there is limited scope to adjust. That being said Green looked the goods last night and he will certainly
get time at the crease going by last nights abysmal top order batting from the Scorchers. Livingstone unlucky with his dismissal. DRS
instead of that 90 second waste of space might of been handy ( money issue for CA ).
If the Scorchers are going to be 4/29 each game he might be a very good pick though ?
Scorchers have Bye , DRG , Bye just to complicate it any further.
Maximum Scorchers/Strikers players you could have would be 7 (trade out 3 - then hope your 4 bench players are playing as cover , too much risk involved for my liking)
Apparently not all of the coaches agreed to using DRS , can't understand why ?