There was a school of thought some years ago that T20 scores hadn't got as high as they might be expected to in the analytics age because wickets were over-valued by batsmen: that is to say, there was still an element of preservation that didn't need to exist.
I think this tournament has showed that it's still vitally important to keep a partnership going: losing wickets has a massive tangible effect on run rates even if it's just not ticking the strike over as reliably as a set pair.
Spot on , as much as they go on about tempo batting and helter skelter , their is still time for normal cricket shots , eliminate the dots (30 per innings) , rotate with 1's and 2's.
Not everything has to go to the boundary.
Not everything can go to the boundary.
Unfortunately most have grown up watching Gilly & Haydos , and will never be them.
Play smarter.
The mentality of most Australian batsmen sadly needs to change