- Joined
- 21 May 2012
- Messages
- 22,312
- Likes
- 31,158
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Strategy Round 2: Trades
- Thread starter doc ron
- Start date
I think they should have to name teams this week so we can think about it all properly ?
Be nice to know how they propose to hold home games if the SA & WA don't relax/lift their border restrictions.
Ceglar could be even more viable if the byes are back.
I am worried about what I do if Naismith dissapointed in a few weeks , which way I can go , Cameron & Williams being named Round 2 would be very good.
I might end up going early on Doedee depending on team selections.
Be interesting how the shorter quarters impact Whitfield , assuming he is a top forward the season he might only drop to that $ 550 k mark so be hard to get him back.
Be nice to know how they propose to hold home games if the SA & WA don't relax/lift their border restrictions.
Ceglar could be even more viable if the byes are back.
I am worried about what I do if Naismith dissapointed in a few weeks , which way I can go , Cameron & Williams being named Round 2 would be very good.
I might end up going early on Doedee depending on team selections.
Be interesting how the shorter quarters impact Whitfield , assuming he is a top forward the season he might only drop to that $ 550 k mark so be hard to get him back.
Seems crazy to me. You're adding someone who's a less than 5% chance at being a season keeper, who will need to be traded again, for the sake of a 186 you won't even get to take advantage of (unless you plan to trade him out within a month, and you can bank the $ rise).
With the shorter rounds, we're going to see extreme high scores and extreme low scores. Next week it could be Luke Shuey or Shaun Higgins posting 180, I wouldn't be tempted by them either.
With the shorter rounds, we're going to see extreme high scores and extreme low scores. Next week it could be Luke Shuey or Shaun Higgins posting 180, I wouldn't be tempted by them either.
Shame Fort wasn't DPP but who knows what Geelong will do with their Rucks.
Ceglar will be interesting if he gets a good crack at #1 ruck.
Been following some of the posts in the Ultimate League but sounds way to confusing & complicated for me though , looks like a fun concept though trying to balance squads for now and future seasons.
Ceglar will be interesting if he gets a good crack at #1 ruck.
Been following some of the posts in the Ultimate League but sounds way to confusing & complicated for me though , looks like a fun concept though trying to balance squads for now and future seasons.
Interesting thought , running 102-105 players from M2-M8 though I wonder how many points you lose to other teams and whether you can make it up in D & F , might well be a case where D5-6 & F5-6 are compromised positions.
Still would like a majority playing bench Round 2 if possible.
Most combos I come up with I still end up with 7-8 players onfield that will need to be upgraded and if that takes 8-12 downgrades if the cash generation is not there , no idea how to make it work.
Will keep thinking & tinkering.
Still would like a majority playing bench Round 2 if possible.
Most combos I come up with I still end up with 7-8 players onfield that will need to be upgraded and if that takes 8-12 downgrades if the cash generation is not there , no idea how to make it work.
Will keep thinking & tinkering.
So let's expand that idea.
2 x 150 + 14 x 95 = 1,630 points --> /16 = 102 average in your team.
Viney has one season over 92, which was a 97.
He has never played 22 games in a season, in 8 seasons. His best are 21, 21, 20, 18, 16, 13.
That means in his BEST 6 seasons he averages missing 4 games/season.
So all of a sudden, you are saying "all he needs to do from here is", play 4 games more than his history suggests, at 5/game higher average than he ever has, and 10/game higher average than his base.
That's not what I'd call within the bounds of reasonable expectations.
2 x 150 + 14 x 95 = 1,630 points --> /16 = 102 average in your team.
Viney has one season over 92, which was a 97.
He has never played 22 games in a season, in 8 seasons. His best are 21, 21, 20, 18, 16, 13.
That means in his BEST 6 seasons he averages missing 4 games/season.
So all of a sudden, you are saying "all he needs to do from here is", play 4 games more than his history suggests, at 5/game higher average than he ever has, and 10/game higher average than his base.
That's not what I'd call within the bounds of reasonable expectations.