Discussion Round 2: Teams & In Game Discussion

[KLo30]

any late changes for westcoast game?

Post #1,015

 

[Herbie66]

Anyone else looking to grab Pitto R3 next week?

Just scored 134 against the best tap ruckman in the game , would seem a obvious trade in to me

If Naismith is back might even trade Grundy out to get them both ?

Depends on how strong your onfield rookies are and how your bench looks to generate $$$ I guess.

 

[Lgndhen23]

looks like Pittonet and Naismith are going to make some good money. Is one of them worth trading in for the bench? If so, which one to select? Or having around $240K sitting on the bench for some weeks too much?

main point would be for cash gen and backup if gawn or grundy out, so i would do with pittonet (younger, not as injury prone, cheaper)

 

[Lost In The Sky]

Pretty good score for only 50% TOG - I’ll take that
Also happy he got through the the game uninjured ??

Yeah for a guy who's had so much trouble with injury... It's really good to see him get through a game ok from a footy fans perspective.

 

[Vicwood]

*** on 50% TOG for Harley..

 

[Beijing_Sting]

hmmm - Brander or keeping TRivers score? Think I will keep Trivers against most peoples Starch

 

[Herbie66]

Melbourne stated before the game that Bennell would be on restricted game time.

Not sure why it is such a surprise.

 

[Johnsy44]

Traded Nic Nat to Pittonet this week to free up some cash, looking like a good trade so far

 

[Connoisseur]

Jacobs , Naismith , Pittonet might be a interesting ruck line ?

M Gawn and B Grundy= 277+ 294= 571
S Jacobs, S Naismith and M Pittonet= 134+121+134= 389 (Jacobs still to come)

 

[Ben's Beasts]

I’ll have 5 rucks after trades next week ?

 

[Juzzo]

Changing between leagues in Gameday is a pain in the a$$. You have to go back to the gameday menu, then select leagues again. (on imac)

 

[KLo30]

Yeah... certainly makes it harder for us doesn't it.

Yes, it certainly does. I missed being able to put the C on Gawn when I did trades late before the game as I was waiting for final confirmation of teams. SC website finally allowed the trades before the game but wouldn't allow any changes for the last 3 minutes so no Gawn captain score.

Lots of jobs lost in the AFL and News Limited, etc. We might have to plan to not do last minute things.

 

[Bermi]

main point would be for cash gen and backup if gawn or grundy out, so i would do with pittonet (younger, not as injury prone, cheaper)

3 very good reasons

 

[Lost In The Sky]

Changing between leagues in Gameday is a pain in the a$$. You have to go back to the gameday menu, then select leagues again. (on imac)

Yeah its a bit clunky isn't it... Much smoother and easier last year.

 

[Bermi]

Melbourne stated before the game that Bennell would be on restricted game time.

Not sure why it is such a surprise.

I missed that, but not sorry I traded him in, yet.

 

[jo_el]

looks like Pittonet and Naismith are going to make some good money. Is one of them worth trading in for the bench? If so, which one to select? Or having around $240K sitting on the bench for some weeks too much?

I think there is good value, for me I would rather have the loophole option for R3.

 

[Rumbler]

On ya Captain Gawnyyy! What a beast! #FearTheBeard

 

[Juzzo]

Yeah its a bit clunky isn't it... Much smoother and easier last year.

Just worked it out. You have to shut matchup (click on X) then the "back to league" button works and goes back to all leagues. I'm getting old, haha.

 

[Bomber18]

looks like Pittonet and Naismith are going to make some good money. Is one of them worth trading in for the bench? If so, which one to select? Or having around $240K sitting on the bench for some weeks too much?

Yeah I’m probably gonna take Pit at R3 on the bench. If he’s scoring 130s against Gawn, he’ll likely average 100 this year and make 200k+

I don’t have Rivers or Cameron, would take Rivers after a price rise

 

[Kidult]

Just scored 134 against the best tap ruckman in the game , would seem a obvious trade in to me

If Naismith is back might even trade Grundy out to get them both ?

Depends on how strong your onfield rookies are and how your bench looks to generate $$$ I guess.

M Gawn and B Grundy= 277+ 294= 571
S Jacobs, S Naismith and M Pittonet= 134+121+134= 389 (Jacobs still to come)

Even more with the C on Grundy r1 and Gawn r2