Discussion Round 3: Teams & In Game Discussion
- Thread starter KLo30
- Start date
If you can still get 18 scoring players then it’s not much different to sideways trading a premium in normal circumstances. I’d only be tempted if it avoided a donut in the 18.
Still to get any clear explanation as to what CD intend to do when / if the catch up game gets scheduled and this crazy double point possibility (which I can’t get my head around at all)
Still to get any clear explanation as to what CD intend to do when / if the catch up game gets scheduled and this crazy double point possibility (which I can’t get my head around at all)
- Joined
- 30 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 1,540
- Likes
- 5,910
- AFL Club
- Richmond
It has been a round with its challenges
J. McInerney
B. Davis
B. Williams
D. Martin
- Whitfield on the field.
- I have 4 Melbourne/Essendon players
- D Smith score replaced by Budarick (swap)
- Bennell replaced by Brander (Def Emerg)
- Rivers replaced by T.Brown (Mid Emerg)
- Gawn replaced by Pittonet (Ruck Emerg)
J. McInerney
B. Davis
B. Williams
D. Martin
We have the rolling lockout, which means that A: The sooner the competition knew about a decision, the better and B: the solutions for AFL Fantasy/Dream Team won't work for Supercoach. Is best 18+DGW perfect for SC? Absolutely not, but ideas being thrown around about average scores counting or players scoring what they're priced to average are far worse.
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2013
- Messages
- 649
- Likes
- 1,625
- AFL Club
- Brisbane
Thank you both @Bomber18 and @Rowsus. I'm pretty sure you're both right and thought that would likely be the case. Just thought I'd ask as I'd realised that I could potentially also slip the E on Budarick in the Fwd line (already have King as Fwd E) in case more than one of Long, Bewley or Sturt really spudded it up. Think I'll play it safe and leave it off Budarick in case he scores lower than King and this score finishes up getting used in the best 18.
- Joined
- 30 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 1,540
- Likes
- 5,910
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Like I said, it's definitely not perfect; but the rolling lockout has morphed SC into a game that requires more attention than it used to. Ideally you'd have scores added to this round once the Ess v Melbourne game is eventually played, but A: Team lineups will undoubtedly change and B: I think technical limitations of the SC system prevent that.
People who have access to information with a rolling lockout would have had the advantage no matter what (assuming all else was equal because lineups/trades remaining etc is different from squad to squad).
People who have access to information with a rolling lockout would have had the advantage no matter what (assuming all else was equal because lineups/trades remaining etc is different from squad to squad).
