Just some thoughts regarding Jack Steven's score. He got 67, but it should have been 81 based solely on two umpiring decisions in the first quarter.
Firstly, he was pinged for run too far, a free kick you rarely see paid (-4 points). As he was pinged, he hit a teammate on the chest around 30 out from goal. At least 4 points for the effective kick and another 3 points for a score assist (surely).
He was pinged a couple of minutes later for a deliberate out of bounds. I assume that is counted as a free against resulting in another -4 points.
If you do the maths, that is a 14 point loss based on two decisions that could very easily have gone the other way.
So, why did I go to the effort to point these small moments out? Well, an 81 looks a helluva lot better than a 67. If you are keeping a close eye on him, like me (great value at 300k), you might find it useful to know that his score likely SHOULD have been a lot more respectable.