Discussion BBL|10 SC: Team & In-Game Discussion - Home of #1 and #2 Leagues

[Connoisseur]

Well, the scores have locked in and Carey still hasn't moved... any idea if they actually can be changed at this point?

Help- Point Scoring- FAQ:
Q:Why has my score changed after lockout?
A: Any live or end-of-game scoring provided during the round should be treated as tentative and indicative only. Once the stats are reviewed at the end of the round, player scores may change slightly when the official results are published.

 

[Professor]

I think Herbie was hoping you'd get your tweeting powers going.
Carey only has 10 bonus points for runs, instead of the 20 a 100+ score should get.

Done. @Herbie66

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352222223663128576

 

[Tails]

Well, the scores have locked in and Carey still hasn't moved... any idea if they actually can be changed at this point?

I think I recall something being changed in the past .... don't think they are locked until the end of the round ...

 

[Ironhawk]

Well, the scores have locked in and Carey still hasn't moved... any idea if they actually can be changed at this point?

I am guessing they can be right up until the next round starts.

With half of my league opponents having Carey, I sort of hope they don't change it, but I expect they will.

 

[Herbie66]

I think Herbie was hoping you'd get your tweeting powers going.
Carey only has 10 bonus points for runs, instead of the 20 a 100+ score should get.

nah not me @Professor did enough tweeting the Afghanistan Cricket Board when I asked (and other requests)

My suggestion was all Carey owners to contact the games organisers and ask why his score is wrong.

But I would be surprised if too many could even be bothered sending a message to be totally honest.

 

[Il Perugino]

5/424 Stoinis VC
Panic traded KRicho to Neser last night who became Siddle when I realised I wouldn’t have enough cash to convert Sams and Inglis to Short and Philippe. Happy about that!

Then saw Carey was opening so Short became Carey. Even happier!

Last trade tomorrow Sams —> Phillipe

Bound to go pear shaped from here.

 

[mike89]

I am guessing they can be right up until the next round starts.

With half of my league opponents having Carey, I sort of hope they don't change it, but I expect they will.

I'd be very upset if they didn't. Not just for the extra ten points for myself, but it would suggest they could just disregard any of the other rules if they so chose. It hasn't happened yet, but the ten point wicket bonus is per three wickets in a match, so if someone got six they should get it twice, as an example.

 

[Professor]

Done. @Herbie66

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352222223663128576

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352223812838944768

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352223815045177344

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352224648109334528

 

[Herbie66]

I'd be very upset if they didn't. Not just for the extra ten points for myself, but it would suggest they could just disregard any of the other rules if they so chose. It hasn't happened yet, but the ten point wicket bonus is per three wickets in a match, so if someone got six they should get it twice, as an example.

Maybe that's why they don't have a "additional" bonus for a Michelle.

ok so now we need someone to get 6 wickets to see if they do actually get 20 points , which the way it is written I agree 100% with you.

 

[Tails]

I'd be very upset if they didn't. Not just for the extra ten points for myself, but it would suggest they could just disregard any of the other rules if they so chose. It hasn't happened yet, but the ten point wicket bonus is per three wickets in a match, so if someone got six they should get it twice, as an example.

I've sent plenty of emails over the years ...

- Regarding players that have changed teams or are new additions etc they will eventually update and be reflected ....

- I think on one occasion they had the wrong player down for a catch and amended it ... but that was during the actual game when it was pointed out ...

- Outside of that .... nothing has been amended post game from any feedback I've supplied that I can recall

 

[Connoisseur]

Dont agree at all to be honest, terrible tactical decisions that got them a mile behind the required rate and ultimately cost them the game, Ricky Ponting didn't hold back in his criticism either which I totally agreed with.

Don’t mind opening with Labuschagne but if so, I would have had Bryant and Wildermuth coming in at 3 and 4 rather than 6 and 8. Still need someone to find the gaps and rotate the strike in the top order rather than going out all guns blazing.

The Heat prefer to lose the game by the 5th-6th over rather than winning in the 20th. Time and time again they make the same poor decisions and try to finish it off with overs to spare and yet they still never learn. Far too dependent on Lynn firing, otherwise they all collapse for a measly total.

 

[Diabolical]

I’m either 3/130 or 5/226.

Since I wasn’t looping my keeper I had a “spare” E which I threw on Marnus after I already had an E in Zampa yesterday. Means I am too clever for my own good and can take their combined score of 96 using two bowling donuts or not take either.

I am leaning towards banking the 96 over fielding two of Livingston, Inglis and Tye.

 

[Professor]

I’m either 3/130 or 5/226.

Since I wasn’t looping my keeper I had a “spare” E which I threw on Marnus after I already had an E in Zampa yesterday. Means I am too clever for my own good and can take their combined score of 96 using two bowling donuts or not take either.

I am leaning towards banking the 96 over fielding two of Livingston, Inglis and Tye.

Interesting decision, but agree the 96 is safer.

 

[Tails]

I’m either 3/130 or 5/226.

Since I wasn’t looping my keeper I had a “spare” E which I threw on Marnus after I already had an E in Zampa yesterday. Means I am too clever for my own good and can take their combined score of 96 using two bowling donuts or not take either.

I am leaning towards banking the 96 over fielding two of Livingston, Inglis and Tye.

Can resonate somewhat ....

Got Inglis, Livingstone, Khawaja, Tye and Dorf ... need to play 3 of them and 1 will be traded out ....

- Got me stuffed which 3 I should go with ... might need to give the dartboard a workout ....

 

[Rowsus]

I’m either 3/130 or 5/226.

Since I wasn’t looping my keeper I had a “spare” E which I threw on Marnus after I already had an E in Zampa yesterday. Means I am too clever for my own good and can take their combined score of 96 using two bowling donuts or not take either.

I am leaning towards banking the 96 over fielding two of Livingston, Inglis and Tye.

I banked Z Khan's 43 over risking another player. 96 doesn't sound too bad.

 

[Connoisseur]

Can resonate somewhat ....

Got Inglis, Livingstone, Khawaja, Tye and Dorf ... need to play 3 of them and 1 will be traded out ....

- Got me stuffed which 3 I should go with ... might need to give the dartboard a workout ....

Make sure to avoid any Jose-esque counting errors.

 

[Darkie]

Done. @Herbie66

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352222223663128576

Awesome, thanks mate.

I used @Herbie66’s suggestion and contacted them via their online form, but I suspect Twitter is much more likely to get their attention!

 

[Professor]

Awesome, thanks mate.

I used @Herbie66’s suggestion and contacted them via their online form, but I suspect Twitter is much more likely to get their attention!

No response from official channel, but others. Anyway we did get some sort of clarification.

 

[Darkie]

No response from official channel, but others. Anyway we did get some sort of clarification.

Indeed - I suspect they may be done for the evening, but drawing attention to it, and perhaps getting a couple of third party responses, will hopefully improve the chances of them fixing it.

 

[Professor]

Don't forget double header Friday starting at 4.05pm