nearly stuffed it badly. however I'm only missing the Tye to Wade trade, and I've now got Behrendorff on instead of Inglis - just hoping Dorff and Tye take a 3fa each, argh!!
On the bright side I still have Roy, and now has a quick 20
Does anybody else really miss the old scoring system? It just seems strange to have an arbitrary invisible line where scoring a run nets you 26 points. I think the old [runs + (runs - balls faced)] used to more accurately reflex the actual batting performance
Does anybody else really miss the old scoring system? It just seems strange to have an arbitrary invisible line where scoring a run nets you 26 points. I think the old [runs + (runs - balls faced)] used to more accurately reflex the actual batting performance
Does anybody else really miss the old scoring system? It just seems strange to have an arbitrary invisible line where scoring a run nets you 26 points. I think the old [runs + (runs - balls faced)] used to more accurately reflex the actual batting performance
Definitely a bigger fan of the old system. You are right, the difference between 19 and 20 is kind of arbitrary. To me you should get the gap of runs scored to balls faced until a max of 25, and I think a one point bonus for a six or a four is fair enough given you get them for dot balls.
Does anybody else really miss the old scoring system? It just seems strange to have an arbitrary invisible line where scoring a run nets you 26 points. I think the old [runs + (runs - balls faced)] used to more accurately reflex the actual batting performance
I think the question is does anybody not miss it; 25 points is way too much for somebody who scores 20 (like Roy has here), and 0 is not enough for somehow who gets a quickfire 19.
