Analysis BBL|10 Player's Price & Break Even Projections by TAILS
- Thread starter Tails
- Start date
Round 12 Top 20 teams:
- 17 teams managed to hold their spots ... and 2 managed to climb their way back into the Top 20 teams
- @MattWade03 announced his trades at the completion of the round in the running game thread .. thanks !!
- So as of now, I've also provided the trades those 17 teams probably made ...
- At least 6 SCS members that I know of are in it this week ... running total is at least 16 so far this year ...
- 17 teams managed to hold their spots ... and 2 managed to climb their way back into the Top 20 teams
- @MattWade03 announced his trades at the completion of the round in the running game thread .. thanks !!
- So as of now, I've also provided the trades those 17 teams probably made ...
- At least 6 SCS members that I know of are in it this week ... running total is at least 16 so far this year ...
Last edited:
Sorry for the confusion. My fault, it is probably the way I wrote it.
I was referring to "Knackers 11" in the forum, a top 50 team, as having a side with 4 players that scored well, and one I thought would advance.
I think @Ironhawk was referring to the 2 "trades" that "Knacker's 11" made, which looks to be: Munro and Fletcher out; Wade and Labuchagne in.
Although I wish it was my team, it is not.
Maybe next year "Woosie's XI", which is my team, will be in top 20
I was referring to "Knackers 11" in the forum, a top 50 team, as having a side with 4 players that scored well, and one I thought would advance.
I think @Ironhawk was referring to the 2 "trades" that "Knacker's 11" made, which looks to be: Munro and Fletcher out; Wade and Labuchagne in.
Although I wish it was my team, it is not.
Maybe next year "Woosie's XI", which is my team, will be in top 20
Sorry for the confusion. My fault, it is probably the way I wrote it.
I was referring to "Knackers 11" in the forum, a top 50 team, as having a side with 4 players that scored well, and one I thought would advance.
I think @Ironhawk was referring to the 2 "trades" that "Knacker's 11" made, which looks to be: Munro and Fletcher out; Wade and Labuchagne in.
Although I wish it was my team, it is not.
Maybe next year "Woosie's XI", which is my team, will be in top 20
I was referring to "Knackers 11" in the forum, a top 50 team, as having a side with 4 players that scored well, and one I thought would advance.
I think @Ironhawk was referring to the 2 "trades" that "Knacker's 11" made, which looks to be: Munro and Fletcher out; Wade and Labuchagne in.
Although I wish it was my team, it is not.
Maybe next year "Woosie's XI", which is my team, will be in top 20
Sorry for the confusion. My fault, it is probably the way I wrote it.
I was referring to "Knackers 11" in the forum, a top 50 team, as having a side with 4 players that scored well, and one I thought would advance.
I think @Ironhawk was referring to the 2 "trades" that "Knacker's 11" made, which looks to be: Munro and Fletcher out; Wade and Labuchagne in.
Although I wish it was my team, it is not.
Maybe next year "Woosie's XI", which is my team, will be in top 20
I was referring to "Knackers 11" in the forum, a top 50 team, as having a side with 4 players that scored well, and one I thought would advance.
I think @Ironhawk was referring to the 2 "trades" that "Knacker's 11" made, which looks to be: Munro and Fletcher out; Wade and Labuchagne in.
Although I wish it was my team, it is not.
Maybe next year "Woosie's XI", which is my team, will be in top 20
