Opinion Player X vs. Player Y
- Thread starter Darkie
- Start date
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 4,890
- Likes
- 11,150
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Grundy most like a premium over Dunkley in their respective position. Both could argue have upside.
Rozee has potential to push 95-100 and just off best 6 (mostly likely 10-15th) and maybe you keep as lack of $$ at season end
Taranto may push 105 and be 30th midfielder and bleed out.
Preuss edges Heppell by 10-20 points.
Grunzeeppell for me.
Rozee has potential to push 95-100 and just off best 6 (mostly likely 10-15th) and maybe you keep as lack of $$ at season end
Taranto may push 105 and be 30th midfielder and bleed out.
Preuss edges Heppell by 10-20 points.
Grunzeeppell for me.
Grundy, Dunkley and rookie?
Much prefer the first group though. Grundy is the clear best player in the 6 with upside potential.
Rozee can be a kepper, Heppell can be a solid cash cow. Dunkley rock solid with decent upside potential also but also a more solid downside case than Grundy. Taranto needs to be a keeper and I'm not sure he has it in him, just not sold his role improves a lot this year on last year. Preuss is a safer version of Heppell, not a keeper but capable of being a solid cash cow.
Much prefer the first group though. Grundy is the clear best player in the 6 with upside potential.
Rozee can be a kepper, Heppell can be a solid cash cow. Dunkley rock solid with decent upside potential also but also a more solid downside case than Grundy. Taranto needs to be a keeper and I'm not sure he has it in him, just not sold his role improves a lot this year on last year. Preuss is a safer version of Heppell, not a keeper but capable of being a solid cash cow.
I question this theory. Preuss needs 95 to match a solid 61ppg 124k rookie. There were 9 rucks who averaged that last year in a year where ruck scores are generally considered inflated. One of those is Rhys Stanley who did it over a really small sample. So effectively less than half the #1 rucks in the league put up Preuss BE level. There were also about 7 rucks who averaged less than 80 as the #1. The good rucks score well and I think Preuss is probably a good one but there sure is a lot of downside.
I still think he's a good pick but as far as rookies go he's bloody expensive and anyone picking him really does have to ask the question of can they use that 180k better elsewhere in their starting team.
I still think he's a good pick but as far as rookies go he's bloody expensive and anyone picking him really does have to ask the question of can they use that 180k better elsewhere in their starting team.
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 19,074
- Likes
- 80,340
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Very interesting - I felt like people had missed Stewart’s injury “news”. No need to replace him in my side then, and in that case Stewart comfortably over Dusty.
To me Dusty is largely a WYSIWYG pick, but will finish stronger than he starts, so he’s an upgrade target. Stewart is an underpriced quality premo in my view, so he’s a starting pick.
To me Dusty is largely a WYSIWYG pick, but will finish stronger than he starts, so he’s an upgrade target. Stewart is an underpriced quality premo in my view, so he’s a starting pick.
