Discussion 2021: Strategy, Team & Player Discussions
- Thread starter Darkie
- Start date
Just did a re-jig and have Chapman and Highmore on field, Gould and Laurie as placeholders on the bench. Don't know much about Koschitzke to be honest, need to do some research.
I can't really fit Hayden Young as some others have done. I already have Heppel just above him and Ziebell just below in price and you start to thread the needle with too many picks in that 250-350k range.
My forward line is Heeney + rookies now
I can't really fit Hayden Young as some others have done. I already have Heppel just above him and Ziebell just below in price and you start to thread the needle with too many picks in that 250-350k range.
My forward line is Heeney + rookies now
- Joined
- 21 May 2012
- Messages
- 22,346
- Likes
- 31,261
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Just did a re-jig and have Chapman and Highmore on field, Gould and Laurie as placeholders on the bench. Don't know much about Koschitzke to be honest, need to do some research.
I can't really fit Hayden Young as some others have done. I already have Heppel just above him and Ziebell just below in price and you start to thread the needle with too many picks in that 250-350k range.
My forward line is Heeney + rookies now
I can't really fit Hayden Young as some others have done. I already have Heppel just above him and Ziebell just below in price and you start to thread the needle with too many picks in that 250-350k range.
My forward line is Heeney + rookies now
Chapman @ D5 + 3 x $ 123,900.00 at the moment
Chugg being named Round 1 would be very nice.
Heeney locked away at F1
Heppell now is my M7 , might need to adjust their although I can't see too many of Collier-Dawkins , Mead , Stephens , Valente etc being named.
A few $ 117 k players getting talked about.
Might need to look at Phillips/Campbell again.
If I lost Heppell , I could probably go Cummins , Young or Hamill at D5.
Now what would removing Gawn or Grundy allow me to do ? (Just joking)
- Joined
- 21 May 2012
- Messages
- 22,346
- Likes
- 31,261
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I’ve flirted with laird/Dusty at m3 in my 13 premo side for most of the ore season whilst running Whitfield Stewart l Mac Docherty
But with Whitfields injury and the talk of all this scoring with the new rule I like the mix of Lloyd Stewart short lmac h young highmore
Laird in the guts
Makes it easy to have Whitfield as my target to finish off the defense
But with Whitfields injury and the talk of all this scoring with the new rule I like the mix of Lloyd Stewart short lmac h young highmore
Laird in the guts
Makes it easy to have Whitfield as my target to finish off the defense
Still too early to tell , but think it's a case of writing out a list of possibles and checking them off against team annoucements and if they are named find a spot for them.
If Treacy is named was thinking of using Saunders as the donut but maybe a D/M would be better or a cheap D that is injured.
Not sure how GC work as VC/C but isn't Thompson still injured ?
More thinking to do.
If Treacy is named was thinking of using Saunders as the donut but maybe a D/M would be better or a cheap D that is injured.
Not sure how GC work as VC/C but isn't Thompson still injured ?
More thinking to do.
Called it
Lazzaro as the early, no one has mentioned him at all out of nowhere rookie. Good signs there.
Also called it! Do like it for him, almost forces him to compete (an issue) and then really exposes his strengths as a position. Needs a fair bit of physical development still but he could be a pretty dynamic player in that role. Sometimes football is paradoxical in it's nature where a player is best suited to a position that on face value makes no sense as it actually disables their negative traits. Stephenson for example when given free space will try and expand it further but when you force him into the phone box he has to embrace it.
Lazzaro as the early, no one has mentioned him at all out of nowhere rookie. Good signs there.
Also called it! Do like it for him, almost forces him to compete (an issue) and then really exposes his strengths as a position. Needs a fair bit of physical development still but he could be a pretty dynamic player in that role. Sometimes football is paradoxical in it's nature where a player is best suited to a position that on face value makes no sense as it actually disables their negative traits. Stephenson for example when given free space will try and expand it further but when you force him into the phone box he has to embrace it.
What do you expect Cockatoo to score out of interest? Looking at his previous games, I'm not sure why he is the most popular pick. Lots of sub 50 scores, a few 70's and 2 90 scores from 30+ games. I guess he is the most likely "rookie" to play in the forwards (along with Rowe), but I'm definitely not 100% on him at this point - there should be better options available. No idea who at this point which is the concern!
