Opinion RD1: VC/C Selections

Who will be your VC/C? (Pick 2)

  • M Gawn

    Votes: 74 72.5%
  • L Neale

    Votes: 16 15.7%
  • B Grundy

    Votes: 39 38.2%
  • J Macrae

    Votes: 35 34.3%
  • J Kelly

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • C Oliver

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • N Fyfe

    Votes: 2 2.0%
  • P Dangerfield

    Votes: 6 5.9%
  • J Lloyd

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 17 16.7%

  • Total voters
    102
Joined
10 Feb 2014
Messages
11,375
Likes
21,228
AFL Club
Essendon
#63
The bloke kills us.

Been doing so ever since we took Billy Hartung over him in the draft.

Fingers crossed we get him as a FA next year.

And FWIW starting and owning him for the first time in SC this year, and looking forward to it.
You can have him in SC. Otherwise, hands off. :cool:

Re: Round 1: Macrae or Gawn, Macrae or Gawn...?

Merrett...
 
Last edited:
Joined
2 Mar 2014
Messages
588
Likes
2,041
AFL Club
Essendon
#66
I would normally take 120 over Merrett, but if it forces you to select a donut you otherwise wouldn’t, I’d probably pick another cash cow and bet on Merrett getting close or better.
Thanks Darkie, havent finalised my rookies yet. Likely to give Merrett a spin and probably start Warner. New rules will suit Merrett and I am expecting him to score well this year. Elite spread and contested and endurance.
 

Darkie

Leadership Group
Joined
12 Apr 2014
Messages
25,410
Likes
65,497
AFL Club
Collingwood
#67
Thanks Darkie, havent finalised my rookies yet. Likely to give Merrett a spin and probably start Warner. New rules will suit Merrett and I am expecting him to score well this year. Elite spread and contested and endurance.
Good to hear, especially from a Bombers fan!

I did a four-way premo swap just a couple of days ago (very unusual for me) and Merrett as well as Ridley came in.
 
Joined
16 Jun 2013
Messages
5,465
Likes
11,297
AFL Club
Adelaide
#69
Bont failed, so options:
Lloyd, Neale, Merrett, Danger?
Probably go Neale, but Danger could feast on Crows.
 
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,763
Likes
11,759
AFL Club
West Coast
#71
I have the V on Macrae and C on Gawn. The poor scoring of rucks so far given how the game style has changed is making think I should take Macrae's 118 where in previous years I would have just backed in Gawn to go bigger. Add to this Max has gone sub 100 in game one last two seasons. Anyone have any thoughts?
 
Joined
4 Mar 2021
Messages
450
Likes
2,319
AFL Club
Fremantle
#72
I have the V on Macrae and C on Gawn. The poor scoring of rucks so far given how the game style has changed is making think I should take Macrae's 118 where in previous years I would have just backed in Gawn to go bigger. Add to this Max has gone sub 100 in game one last two seasons. Anyone have any thoughts?
I'm in the same position, probably just going to back in Gawn. Playing Meek at the MCG, big pre season. Grundy still managed 40+ hit outs last night against an aggresive double team. Gawn isn't getting bullied around by a first gamer. The 70/30 time share is maybe the concern, probably a good oppurtunity to give Jackson that full 30 against a first gamer.

I do have options though - Neale, Merret, Fyfe, Danger.

Couldn't tell ya what I'll do :p
 
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,763
Likes
11,759
AFL Club
West Coast
#73
Yes I thought about the Meek factor. If Max goes 140 then I am 22 points behind going with Macrae. But I have decided to go with Macrae and have already accepted if Max goes big it is one of those things you decide at the time and based on your best intuition. Good luck with Gawn.
 

Darkie

Leadership Group
Joined
12 Apr 2014
Messages
25,410
Likes
65,497
AFL Club
Collingwood
#74
Yes I thought about the Meek factor. If Max goes 140 then I am 22 points behind going with Macrae. But I have decided to go with Macrae and have already accepted if Max goes big it is one of those things you decide at the time and based on your best intuition. Good luck with Gawn.
I was going to say that I definitely wouldn't select a donut incrementally to take a 118, but if you had one anyway, I can see some appeal in locking in a decent captain's score.

Equally if you're not confident that Gawn gets 118 vs Meek, it probably makes sense to question him as a starting pick.
 
Joined
12 Jan 2014
Messages
3,763
Likes
11,759
AFL Club
West Coast
#75
Hi @Darkie. I have Treacy as the fwd donut. Wanted a r/f for when Marshall comes back as I am running Gawn, Flynn and Meek. Could not afford Fullarton. Hopefully in 6 weeks or so I can cash one of them in for Marshall by moving Treacy to R 3. Taking Macrae leaves me 7/822 but that does not mean much with all the rookies yet to play except Scott who played last night.
 

Darkie

Leadership Group
Joined
12 Apr 2014
Messages
25,410
Likes
65,497
AFL Club
Collingwood
#76
Hi @Darkie. I have Treacy as the fwd donut. Wanted a r/f for when Marshall comes back as I am running Gawn, Flynn and Meek. Could not afford Fullarton. Hopefully in 6 weeks or so I can cash one of them in for Marshall by moving Treacy to R 3. Taking Macrae leaves me 7/822 but that does not mean much with all the rookies yet to play except Scott who played last night.
Makes sense re Treacy. My personal view is that some coaches give up quite a lot of expected points through conservatism on C and E decisions, but it depends on what you're targeting (I almost always target overall rank). I reckon in expected value terms Gawn beats 118, but it depends on your take on that, and on your risk appetite.
 
Top