Discussion 2021 Round 2: Teams & In Game Discussion

[Professor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1375059344631336965

By the looks of Tom Browne last night, i think he's been on a good wicket grazing with the cows. 😜

 

[Professor]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1375019804055138308

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1375062165275639814

 

[Slacker]

Dow does have a relatively low time on ground for some reason...does he lack endurance, I don't think it's because he's getting knocked about?

 

[Toothless Tigers]

Dow does have a relatively low time on ground for some reason...does he lack endurance, I don't think it's because he's getting knocked about?

2017 national draft


I wonder what the revised top 10 would be; Fremantle seems to have performed the best!

 

[Professor]

Dow does have a relatively low time on ground for some reason...does he lack endurance, I don't think it's because he's getting knocked about?

It could be endurance or rotations, as they've got Murphy, Fisher, Gibbons and now Martin up forward, there's no place to put him apart from the bench.

 

[Juzzo]

2/187.

 

[Obie]

Some things for ponder for sure. Howe and Docherty are just going.
Grundy and with vc has done enough to shelve ideas of a ruck restructure.
De Goey missed the chance of a flyer.
Cripps. Well, thinking I might have to pencil him in for M8. Doesn't even look like scoring at a 105-110 level which I had hoped.
So average game for me really. Good thing is no-one else hurt me. Was so close to bringing in Zac Williams too.

 

[Ricky Bobby]

2020, Round 2 ...

"Andrew Brayshaw is cooked! Trading him out tomorrow!" ...

This was my worst trade last year 🙁

 

[Seymour Skinner]

1/135.

Had Grundy VC, but Danger is my only loop and he's still getting the flick this week.
Slow start to the round for me with only Stewart tonight and Sharp on the bench.

Edit: already forgot I owned Daniher lol.

 

[Toothless Tigers]

Held off trading Neale and given him the VC.....

Hope I won't regret the decision

 

[Deeman1]

Once this game started you lose the trade, as you can’t reverse it

It is true, after a round starts you can not reverse trades.

Trading Danger -> Martin and then Martin -> Danger is not reversing trades.

Reversing trades re-sets you team to last weeks ending status, thats why the 'Reverse Trades' does not work after the round has started.

I beleive is is a 'loopohole' that doing the Danger -> Martin and Martin -> Danger costs no trades, like wise Danger -> Martin and then Martin - >Mitchell only costs one trade.

But it only works if you have a trade un-used for the round.

If you did Rowell -> Mitchell and then Danger -> Martin you would have no trades left fo the week so you would be unable to do the reverse Martin -> Danger trades.

 

[BomberArmy]

2017 national draft
View attachment 27714

I wonder what the revised top 10 would be; Fremantle seems to have performed the best!

Looks like everyone except Carlton did well from that list.. great to see.. 😊

 

[Deeman1]

1/82

the wheels might have fallen off already

at least the Ruck debate is over after 10 games

Its not over yet, Max goes 130+ today and Flynn is a late out, then it will be over

 

[BomberArmy]

Its not over yet, Max goes 130+ today and Flynn is a late out, then it will be over

Hope Max goes 130+ today, just not tomorrow.. 😉

 

[Yasi]

Sharp survives! Good boy.

Also put end to the speculation he may not travel away due to year 12 being a priority. good sign.

It is true, after a round starts you can not reverse trades.

Trading Danger -> Martin and then Martin -> Danger is not reversing trades.

Reversing trades re-sets you team to last weeks ending status, thats why the 'Reverse Trades' does not work after the round has started.

I beleive is is a 'loopohole' that doing the Danger -> Martin and Martin -> Danger costs no trades, like wise Danger -> Martin and then Martin - >Mitchell only costs one trade.

But it only works if you have a trade un-used for the round.

If you did Rowell -> Mitchell and then Danger -> Martin you would have no trades left fo the week so you would be unable to do the reverse Martin -> Danger trades.

This is handy little trick. Might be particularly useful for rookie corrections when we won’t know who will actually be on the bubble for later named teams.

so trade out the dropped early game rookie for any late game rookie (doesn’t matter if non-playing) and the switch in the playing NON-SUB rookie when teams are named.

Is that logic correct that would only be counted as one trade?

 

[Game of Sloanes]

Must have changed this year. Normally you can’t undo trades once the round starts

Not 'Reverse Changes' It's just trading out Player B for Player A (The original player) and it allows you to keep your original number of trades

It is true, after a round starts you can not reverse trades.

Trading Danger -> Martin and then Martin -> Danger is not reversing trades.

Reversing trades re-sets you team to last weeks ending status, thats why the 'Reverse Trades' does not work after the round has started.

I beleive is is a 'loopohole' that doing the Danger -> Martin and Martin -> Danger costs no trades, like wise Danger -> Martin and then Martin - >Mitchell only costs one trade.

But it only works if you have a trade un-used for the round.

If you did Rowell -> Mitchell and then Danger -> Martin you would have no trades left fo the week so you would be unable to do the reverse Martin -> Danger trades.

This perfectly sums up what I was trying to say earlier , nailed it.

 

[Deeman1]

Also put end to the speculation he may not travel away due to year 12 being a priority. good sign.


This is handy little trick. Might be particularly useful for rookie corrections when we won’t know who will actually be on the bubble for later named teams.

so trade out the dropped early game rookie for any late game rookie (doesn’t matter if non-playing) and the switch in the playing NON-SUB rookie when teams are babes.

Is that logic correct?

I think the logic is correct as long as you did not need to get the original rookie back I can't see why not, but can not confirm.

So E.g Fullarton ->Brockman and then before Brockman plays Brockman. Brockman -> Freo rookie

Disclaimer: I have not confirmed this works and have never actually done it.

But the logic seems to say it would work.

 

[Yasi]

I think the logic is correct as long as you did not need to get the original rookie back I can't see why not, but can not confirm.

So E.g Fullarton ->Brockman and then before Brockman plays Brockman. Brockman -> Freo rookie

Disclaimer: I have not confirmed this works and have never actually done it.

But the logic seems to say it would work.

Given Jordan, Flynn, Meek, Brockman, Kossi, Dow and other relevant rookies play next Sunday it would be great if someone can confirm they have done this successfully. (Better still if they do it successfully this weekend!)

 

[Erek22]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1375059344631336965

By the looks of Tom Browne last night, i think he's been on a good wicket grazing with the cows. 😜

Wonder if the years of taking damage have started to catch up with him?

 

[Ironhawk]

Wonder if the years of taking damage have started to catch up with him?

No, I think TB is just making up as usual, can't blame injuries for his poor job performance...