Discussion 2021 Round 10: Teams & In Game Discussion

Goodie's Guns

Leadership Group
Joined
21 May 2012
Messages
22,311
Likes
31,152
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Had settled on a VC of Short/Dusty/Zorko tonight, but now with Bergman and Murphy out for their respective sides on Sunday there's the potential to look at other loops.

Issue is, both Bergman and Murphy are huge sub chances you'd think. I'm not sure what to do, maybe just stick with the Friday night VC and save the hassles.
 
Joined
26 Feb 2014
Messages
3,147
Likes
3,311
AFL Club
Hawthorn
might go for the double downgrade...

Would you trade Scott? or Clark even if he isn't playing? Clark right? only reason i'm thinking Scott is the d/m link is rare.
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,806
AFL Club
Collingwood
Had settled on a VC of Short/Dusty/Zorko tonight, but now with Bergman and Murphy out for their respective sides on Sunday there's the potential to look at other loops.

Issue is, both Bergman and Murphy are huge sub chances you'd think. I'm not sure what to do, maybe just stick with the Friday night VC and save the hassles.
Bergman apparently is the only Emergency not named in the updated SANFL side (they play 2.30pm tomorrow afternoon)
 

Goodie's Guns

Leadership Group
Joined
21 May 2012
Messages
22,311
Likes
31,152
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Bergman apparently is the only Emergency not named in the updated SANFL side (they play 2.30pm tomorrow afternoon)
Thanks for that info, hadn't had a chance yet to suss out their finalised SANFL side.

Now it's not a matter of using him as a loop, more so an issue of whether to trade him (had planned to move him on next week) and lock in his $272K rather than potentially lose coin (tight on funds for next weeks plans) if he comes on as sub for a low score.
 
Joined
25 Jul 2012
Messages
47,728
Likes
107,806
AFL Club
Collingwood
Thanks for that info, hadn't had a chance yet to suss out their finalised SANFL side.

Now it's not a matter of using him as a loop, more so an issue of whether to trade him (had planned to move him on next week) and lock in his $272K rather than potentially lose coin (tight on funds for next weeks plans) if he comes on as sub for a low score.
No comments from Ken today is annoying , he has played 5 games in a row now so I wonder if they are just going to use him as sub to "refresh" him.

Certainly has made a nice profit though.

Tough choice though , hope he doesn't get used at all or come on early enough to meet his BE.

They probably fly a 24th player though as well , just in case.
 
Joined
30 Jun 2012
Messages
4,731
Likes
9,085
AFL Club
Brisbane
This but being named means he is a likely sub right? Cheers
No comments from Ken today is annoying , he has played 5 games in a row now so I wonder if they are just going to use him as sub to "refresh" him.

Certainly has made a nice profit though.

Tough choice though , hope he doesn't get used at all or come on early enough to meet his BE.

They probably fly a 24th player though as well , just in case.
 
Joined
18 Apr 2014
Messages
987
Likes
1,241
AFL Club
Richmond
Had settled on a VC of Short/Dusty/Zorko tonight, but now with Bergman and Murphy out for their respective sides on Sunday there's the potential to look at other loops.

Issue is, both Bergman and Murphy are huge sub chances you'd think. I'm not sure what to do, maybe just stick with the Friday night VC and save the hassles.
I like the Friday idea, but not that particular execution this week - obviously depends on your donut availability though.

Welcoming both Dusty and Zorko into my team though, so would welcome a nice pair of 140's :)
 
Top