Good points you make.
My concern for the immediate, is trying to improve my on field scoring and stay in touch and not so much my rookie bench options...I'm reasonably confident plenty of rookies will present.
Round 1 showed me enough to identify at least a few trades that I reckon would with improve my teams on field score with little chance of downside, except, and it's the big one, loss of trades and that's what I'm agonizing over as established SC lore is decidedly against it.
In the past this may have been true but are we now living in a new reality?
My concern for the immediate, is trying to improve my on field scoring and stay in touch and not so much my rookie bench options...I'm reasonably confident plenty of rookies will present.
Round 1 showed me enough to identify at least a few trades that I reckon would with improve my teams on field score with little chance of downside, except, and it's the big one, loss of trades and that's what I'm agonizing over as established SC lore is decidedly against it.
In the past this may have been true but are we now living in a new reality?
We do have more trades than normal, but only by about 17%. It’s an increase, but not a wholesale change in my view.
The buffer, or number of luxury trades, could be up by a greater % than that, if you don’t think other circumstances (eg Covid) eat into that buffer at all (I think it will somewhat). We should still be looking for a good return on our trades, though, even if we can potentially afford to use a few more on less productive uses.
If you charge your trades out at something like 150 points apiece, I don’t think you’ll go too far wrong.