The importance and relevancy being? A good side is not dependent on free kicks as a large source of scoring.
What about the possibility of frees received in the defensive half and then immediately turned over or further down the possession chain resulting in a goal to the opposition. Would you then be happy with receiving more free kicks?
If he stays over 120, then I feel it is an easy bank. If you have one or multiple donuts due to injuries, etc then I would be inclined to gamble and also if you are also missing several of the high scorers this round that significantly exceeded their average.
If he stays over 120, then I feel it is an easy bank. If you have one or multiple donuts due to injuries, etc then I would be inclined to gamble and also if you are also missing several of the high scorers this round that significantly exceeded their average.
Almost brought him in this round in AFL Fantasy, a 128 in that would have been handy for me. He's having a good year, but wouldn't have expected him playing as a defender. Looks like he is scoring well doing it.
Banking Tracs 130.
Sicily has really surprised me so far, I didn't expect he and Hewett would be so much better picks than Ridley/Whitfield.
2 right 2 wrong, meh!
Indicative of the target market the sport panders to, as they believe the only reason their side loses and especially when the margin is under four goals is due to those pesky umpires instead of poor execution from players and coaching staff. They have plentiful time in the preseason and midweek to attempt to fix the deficiencies and ill discipline but many believe they should bear no responsibility whatsoever.
They also do not possess the balls to put their money wheir their mouth is and officiate a match.