Discussion 2022 Round 8: Teams & In Game Discussion

Joined
25 Feb 2019
Messages
2,576
Likes
11,640
AFL Club
Adelaide
17/1,784 Macrae
17/1627 currently taking VC on Neale , still got Sunday carnage to come :rolleyes:
My forward line was a big let down this week
View attachment 43843
Looks a lot like my FWD line.

I'm taking some solace in that none of the players who have scored over 100 this round actually have an Avg over 100.
 
Joined
18 Jun 2012
Messages
6,116
Likes
11,954
AFL Club
Melbourne
Take Neale's 123 or go with Gawn?
The old me would probably take the 123, I think 123 is borderline acceptable, but probably more on the acceptable side.

But Gawn's last 4 have been that or greater and if I was to role the dice on one of Gawn, Oliver or Trac, Gawn would be my choice.

Based on current form and past record, I think Gawn is probably worth the punt.
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
The old me would probably take the 123, I think 123 is borderline acceptable, but probably more on the acceptable side.

But Gawn's last 4 have been that or greater and if I was to role the dice on one of Gawn, Oliver or Trac, Gawn would be my choice.

Based on current form and past record, I think Gawn is probably worth the punt.
Thinking Gawn or Cripps but will probably lean with Gawn.
 

Connoisseur

Leadership Group
Joined
3 Jul 2017
Messages
38,958
Likes
126,621
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Take Neale's 123 or go with Gawn?
For new owners of Gawn that acquired him either this round or over the past two, then it is an easy decision to forego the 123 given his consistency and high ceiling were the key reasons for spending in excess of $650,000 and banking the 123 kind of defeats the purpose of doing so.

7/86 below 90 (since 2018) illustrates that there is little to lose in comparison to other options if you do decide not to bank the 123.
 
Joined
6 Mar 2013
Messages
10,190
Likes
31,121
AFL Club
Carlton
For new owners of Gawn that acquired him either this round or over the past two, then it is an easy decision to forego the 123 given his consistency and high ceiling were the key reasons for spending in excess of $650,000 and banking the 123 kind of defeats the purpose of doing so.

7/86 below 90 (since 2018) illustrates that there is little to lose in comparison to other options if you do decide not to bank the 123.
I have had Gawn since the start so I haven't wasted a trade to acquire/reacquire him. When was the last time he played St Kilda with both Marshall and Ryder in the same lineup? Plus Jackson has returned.
 
Top