Discussion 2022 Round 12: Teams & In Game Discussion

[whiteTiga2k]

Anyone got a credible source?

It's on the afl website. WALLIS SUB

 

[Maccas marvels]

Dammit! Now you've got me second guessing my VC

English doesn’t have a great record against the Cats either….however I’m considering throwing the VC on him just for a bit of fun….seriously good form this year and he cats two rucks gave up 175 last week to ROB….

 

[KLo30]

It's on the afl website. WALLIS SUB

Precisely!

Conway half back flank.

 

[OnTopBar]

English doesn’t have a great record against the Cats either….however I’m considering throwing the VC on him just for a bit of fun….seriously good form this year and he cats two rucks gave up 175 last week to ROB….

Yeah, I'm not a fan of going against my gut feel, although............

 

[Herbie66]

English doesn’t have a great record against the Cats either….however I’m considering throwing the VC on him just for a bit of fun….seriously good form this year and he cats two rucks gave up 175 last week to ROB….

Stanley didn't play last round.

As I previously posted though first ruckman to score above 110 this season v Geelong.

I guess the thing with English though is how many points he gets around the ground in comparison to HO's

 

[OnTopBar]

Stanley didn't play last round.

As I previously posted though first ruckman to score above 110 this season v Geelong.

I guess the thing with English though is how many points he gets around the ground in comparison to HO's

You got me second guessing again, wouldn't surprise me for Scott to nullify English by having Blitz run with him either.

 

[Zimmer]

Think I can only use Bulldogs players as VC from here. Have said that before, but now I mean it.

I mean I have no idea which Bulldog to put the VC on....

May as well go English in his first week in my team. Bound to break him.

Hang on, maybe just leave in on Macrae. He's due.

 

[Goodie's Guns]

You got me second guessing again, wouldn't surprise me for Scott to nullify English by having Blitz run with him either.

I think with the loss of Kolodjashnij that Blicavs services may be required in the defensive 50 a little more than they'd ideally like given how he's been performing through the ruck in general. Especially if Naughton gets a hold of them early.

 

[OnTopBar]

I think with the loss of Kolodjashnij that Blicavs services may be required in the defensive 50 a little more than they'd ideally like given how he's been performing through the ruck in general. Especially if Naughton gets a hold of them early.

I do like how you got to spell Kolo..... & Bli..... correctly. Do you think that Stewart's role could be affected moreso?

 

[OnTopBar]

Think I can only use Bulldogs players as VC from here. Have said that before, but now I mean it.

I mean I have no idea which Bulldog to put the VC on....

May as well go English in his first week in my team. Bound to break him.

Hang on, maybe just leave in on Macrae. He's due.

Who does O'Connor run with?

 

[Ormos]

I think with the loss of Kolodjashnij that Blicavs services may be required in the defensive 50 a little more than they'd ideally like given how he's been performing through the ruck in general. Especially if Naughton gets a hold of them early.

Agreed. Dahlhaus is a fwd so likely means blitz has play more in def this week and Stanley rucks more. Stanley can cover some ground but expect 130odd from English still

 

[Zimmer]

Who does O'Connor run with?

Fill me in...

 

[PC]

I think I want the Dogs to win tonight?

Macrae VC looks good and English as a trade in seems all the rage, so away we go

 

[OnTopBar]

Fill me in...

Whoever is off the leash?


Sorry............I'll see myself out

*Edit...I'd have him on Treloar TBH

 

[Juzzo]

Bont goes ok against Cats normally, VC him I reckon.

 

[Professor]

Being conservative, Macrae vc

 

[Under The Dome]

Expecting Dunkley to sit on Stewart tonight.

Edit: No clear player sitting on him

 

[bluesbrothers]

Just seeking clarification. If you have a full line up, (in say your midfield) does your emergency also count in the bye rounds if they score more than an onfield player?

 

[Tamuhawk]

Just seeking clarification. If you have a full line up, (in say your midfield) does your emergency also count in the bye rounds if they score more than an onfield player?

Nope

 

[KLo30]

Just seeking clarification. If you have a full line up, (in say your midfield) does your emergency also count in the bye rounds if they score more than an onfield player?

NO.

Normal rules for emergencies apply.